Re: Backward-compatibility of text/html media type (ACTION-334, ACTION-364)

Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:58:03 +0100, <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>> That's the choice, I think.  I prefer #1.
> 
> The reason I prefer #2 is that we have had reason to obsolete features 
> over time. Given that it makes sense that conformance also evolves over 
> time as we learn more about the medium.

But we're not obsoleting, we're removing.

If HTML5 only removed things that were already deprecated in HTML4 we'd 
probably have a different discussion.

Best regards, Julian

Received on Tuesday, 2 February 2010 16:27:24 UTC