Sunday, 31 May 2009
- Re: [CSS21] Proposal for a replacement for section 17.2.1 (table anonymous objects)
- Re: [CSS21] Proposal for a replacement for section 17.2.1 (table anonymous objects)
- Re: [CSS21] Proposal for a replacement for section 17.2.1 (table anonymous objects)
- Re: [CSS21] Proposal for a replacement for section 17.2.1 (table anonymous objects)
- Re: [CSS21] Proposal for a replacement for section 17.2.1 (table anonymous objects)
- Re: [CSS21] Proposal for a replacement for section 17.2.1 (table anonymous objects)
- Re: [CSS21] Proposal for a replacement for section 17.2.1 (table anonymous objects)
Saturday, 30 May 2009
- Re: [CSS21] Proposal for a replacement for section 17.2.1 (table anonymous objects)
- Re: [CSS21] Proposal for a replacement for section 17.2.1 (table anonymous objects)
- [CSS21] Proposal for a replacement for section 17.2.1 (table anonymous objects)
- @font-face and unicode-range
Thursday, 28 May 2009
Wednesday, 27 May 2009
Tuesday, 26 May 2009
- Re: New work on fonts at W3C
- Re: New work on fonts at W3C
- Re: New work on fonts at W3C
- Re: New work on fonts at W3C
- Re: New work on fonts at W3C
- Re: New work on fonts at W3C
- Re: New work on fonts at W3C
- Re: New work on fonts at W3C
- Re: New work on fonts at W3C
- [css3-background] SVG in border-image / background-image
Monday, 25 May 2009
- Re: New work on fonts at W3C
- Re: bolder/lighter defintion
- Re: New work on fonts at W3C
- Re: Should implementors copy vendor prefixes from each other?
- Re: Background position
- Re: ruby-position: undesirable default value 'before' for complex ruby
- Re: Sprites (was: Background position)
Sunday, 24 May 2009
- Re: [CSS21] Issues with inline formatting model (particularly 10.8)
- Re: [CSS21] Issues with inline formatting model (particularly 10.8)
Saturday, 23 May 2009
Friday, 22 May 2009
Wednesday, 20 May 2009
- Re: [CSS 2.1] Parsing unexpected atkeywords
- Re: [CSS2.1] Table-layout: fixed
- Re: [CSS21] Clearance paradox
- Re: [CSS 2.1] Parsing unexpected atkeywords
- [CSS 2.1] Parsing unexpected atkeywords
- Re: how to normalize redundant CSS?
- Re: Sprites (was: Background position)
- Re: how to normalize redundant CSS?
- Re: bolder/lighter defintion
- Re: how to normalize redundant CSS?
- Re: [css3-multicol] column-span property
- Re: [css3-multicol] improving the behaviour of floats
- Re: bolder/lighter defintion
- Re: [CSS21] last edition: pity
Tuesday, 19 May 2009
- Re: Sprites (was: Background position)
- [CSS21] figure caption should not mention caption margin collapsing
- [CSS 2.1] redundant note in font-size (15.7)
- Re: [CSS21] last edition: pity
- Re: bolder/lighter defintion
- Re: bolder/lighter defintion
- Re: bolder/lighter defintion
- [css3-text] text-overflow and vertical overflow
- Re: Sprites (was: Background position)
- Re: new CSS3 Fonts edits
- Re: [CSS21] last edition: pity
- Re: bolder/lighter defintion
- Re: bolder/lighter defintion
- Re: bolder/lighter defintion
- RE: bolder/lighter defintion
- Re: bolder/lighter defintion
Monday, 18 May 2009
- Re: Sprites (was: Background position)
- Sprites (was: Background position)
- Re: New work on fonts at W3C
- Re: [css3-transitions] Spec should mention mismatch in list lengths
- Re: [css3-transitions] Spec should mention mismatch in list lengths
- Re: [css3-transitions] What happens when property specified multiple times for 'transition-property' ?
- Re: bolder/lighter defintion
- Re: bolder/lighter defintion
- Re: new CSS3 Fonts edits
- Re: bolder/lighter defintion
- Re: [CSS21] last edition: pity
- Re: bolder/lighter defintion
- RE: bolder/lighter defintion
- bolder/lighter defintion
- new CSS3 Fonts edits
- Re: Background position
Sunday, 17 May 2009
Monday, 18 May 2009
- RE: [css3-multicol] column-span property
- Re: [css3-multicol] improving the behaviour of floats
- Re: [css3-multicol] column-span property
- Re: [css3-multicol] improving the behaviour of floats
- RE: [css3-multicol] column-span property
- RE: [css3-multicol] missing column-break-inside
Sunday, 17 May 2009
- Re: Should implementors copy vendor prefixes from each other?
- Re: [css3-multicol] column-span property
- [css3-multicol] improving the behaviour of floats
- [css3-multicol] column-span property
- [css3-multicol] missing column-break-inside
Saturday, 16 May 2009
Friday, 15 May 2009
- Re: Should implementors copy vendor prefixes from each other?
- [css3-transitions] Spec should mention mismatch in list lengths
- [css3-transitions] What happens when property specified multiple times for 'transition-property' ?
- [css3-transitions] What is allowed for 'transition-property'?
- [css3-transitions] distinguishing duration and delay in 'transition' shorthand
- Re: Should implementors copy vendor prefixes from each other?
- Re: Should implementors copy vendor prefixes from each other?
- Re: Should implementors copy vendor prefixes from each other?
- Re: Should implementors copy vendor prefixes from each other?
- Re: Should implementors copy vendor prefixes from each other?
- Re: Should implementors copy vendor prefixes from each other?
- Re: [css3-transitions] stroke-width transition type
- [css3-transitions] stroke-width transition type
- RE: Should implementors copy vendor prefixes from each other?
- Re: Should implementors copy vendor prefixes from each other?
- Re: Should implementors copy vendor prefixes from each other?
- [css3-transitions] Slightly relaxing cubic-bezier constraints
- Re: Should implementors copy vendor prefixes from each other?
- Re: Should implementors copy vendor prefixes from each other?
- Re: Should implementors copy vendor prefixes from each other?
- Re: controlling digits substitution in IE/FF (Arabic/Hindi/Decimal)
- RE: New work on fonts at W3C
Thursday, 14 May 2009
- Should implementors copy vendor prefixes from each other?
- Re: css3-selectors Summary of Comment
- Re: controlling digits substitution in IE/FF (Arabic/Hindi/Decimal)
- Re: css3-selectors Summary of Comment
- [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2009-04-15
- [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2009-04-29
- [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2009-05-13
Wednesday, 13 May 2009
- Re: New work on fonts at W3C
- Re: Strawman proposal for tweaking background shorthand syntax to address position/size complexity
- Re: New work on fonts at W3C
- Re: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2009-05-06
- [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2009-05-06
- Re: New work on fonts at W3C
Tuesday, 12 May 2009
Monday, 11 May 2009
- Re: Strawman proposal for tweaking background shorthand syntax to address position/size complexity
- Re: Strawman proposal for tweaking background shorthand syntax to address position/size complexity
- Re: [CSS21] last edition: pity
- Re: [CSS21] last edition: pity
Sunday, 10 May 2009
- Re: [CSS21] last edition: pity
- Re: [CSS21] last edition: pity
- Re: [css3-layout] Nested templates and CSS rule order
Saturday, 9 May 2009
- Strawman proposal for tweaking background shorthand syntax to address position/size complexity
- Re: [css3-page] [css3-multicol] paginating for zero-height pages/columns
- Re: Redefining Serif and Sans Serif
- Re: Redefining Serif and Sans Serif
- Redefining Serif and Sans Serif
- [CSS21] Section 10.8 on line-height and vertical-align should have schemas and examples
Friday, 8 May 2009
- Re: [CSS21] last edition: pity
- Re: CSS3 Web Fonts issue with ‘block on download’
- Re: CSS3 Web Fonts issue with ‘block on download’
- Re: CSS3 Web Fonts issue with ‘block on download’
- Re: CSS3 Web Fonts issue with ‘block on download’
- Re: CSS3 Web Fonts issue with ‘block on download’
- Re: css3-selectors Summary of Comment
- Re: CSS3 Web Fonts issue with 'block on download'
- Re: CSS3 Web Fonts issue with 'block on download'
- Re: css3-selectors Summary of Comment
- Re: css3-selectors Summary of Comment
- Re: [CSS21] Issues with inline formatting model (particularly 10.8)
- Re: [css3-layout] Nested templates and CSS rule order
- css3-selectors Summary of Comment
Thursday, 7 May 2009
- Re: [css3-page] [css3-multicol] paginating for zero-height pages/columns
- Re: CSS3 Web Fonts issue with ‘block on download’
- Re: CSS3 Web Fonts issue with ?block on downl oad?
- Re: CSS3 Web Fonts issue with ?block on downl oad?
- [css3-page] [css3-multicol] paginating for zero-height pages/columns
- Re: CSS3 Web Fonts issue with ?block on downl oad?
- Re: CSS3 Web Fonts issue with ?block on downl oad?
- Re: CSS3 Web Fonts issue with ?block on downl oad?
- Re: CSS3 Web Fonts issue with ?block on downl oad?
- RE: CSS3 Web Fonts issue with 'block on download'
- Re: [CSS21] last edition: pity
- Re: CSS3 Web Fonts issue with ?block on downl oad?
- Re: CSS3 Web Fonts issue with ?block on downl oad?
- Re: CSS3 Web Fonts issue with ‘block on download’
- Re: CSS3 Web Fonts issue with ‘block on download’
- Re: CSS3 Web Fonts issue with ?block on downl oad?
- Re: CSS3 Web Fonts issue with ‘block on download’
- Re: CSS3 Web Fonts issue with ?block on downl oad?
- Re: CSS3 Web Fonts issue with ‘block on download’
- RE: CSS3 Web Fonts issue with ‘block on download’
- Re: CSS3 Web Fonts issue with ?block on downl oad?
- Re: CSS3 Web Fonts issue with ‘block on download’
- Re: CSS3 Web Fonts issue with ‘block on download’
- Re: CSS3 Web Fonts issue with ‘block on download’
- Re: CSS3 Web Fonts issue with ‘block on download’
- [css3-layout] Nested templates and CSS rule order
- Re: CSS3 Web Fonts issue with ‘block on download’
- Re: CSS3 Web Fonts issue with ‘block on download’
- CSS3 Web Fonts issue with ‘block on download’
Wednesday, 6 May 2009
Tuesday, 5 May 2009
- RE: [CSS21] last edition: pity
- Re: [CSS21] last edition: pity
- Re: [CSS21] last edition: pity
- [CSS21] last edition: pity
- Re: "Re: [CSS21] rules="all" attribute specification and border-collapse property"
Monday, 4 May 2009
Tuesday, 5 May 2009
- RE: "Re: [CSS21] rules="all" attribute specification and border-collapse property"
- Re: "Re: [CSS21] rules="all" attribute specification and border-collapse property"
- Re: "Re: [CSS21] rules="all" attribute specification and border-collapse property"
- RE: "Re: [CSS21] rules="all" attribute specification and border-collapse property"
Monday, 4 May 2009
- RE: "Re: [CSS21] rules="all" attribute specification and border-collapse property"
- RE: "Re: [CSS21] rules="all" attribute specification and border-collapse property"
- Re: "Re: [CSS21] rules="all" attribute specification and border-collapse property"
- RE: "Re: [CSS21] rules="all" attribute specification and border-collapse property"
- Re: "Re: [CSS21] rules="all" attribute specification and border-collapse property"
- Re: "Re: [CSS21] rules="all" attribute specification and border-collapse property"
- RE: "Re: [CSS21] rules="all" attribute specification and border-collapse property"
- Re: "Re: [CSS21] rules="all" attribute specification and border-collapse property"
- RE: [CSS21] rules="all" attribute specification and border-collapse property
Sunday, 3 May 2009
- Re: [CSS21] rules="all" attribute specification and border-collapse property
- Re: "Re: [CSS21] rules="all" attribute specification and border-collapse property"
Saturday, 2 May 2009
Friday, 1 May 2009
- Re: [CSS21] rules="all" attribute specification and border-collapse property
- Re: SVG and CSS Properties (SVG ACTION-2535)
- RE: "Re: [CSS21] rules="all" attribute specification and border-collapse property"
- Re: "Re: [CSS21] rules="all" attribute specification and border-collapse property"
- Re: "Re: [CSS21] rules="all" attribute specification and border-collapse property"
- "Re: [CSS21] rules="all" attribute specification and border-collapse property"
- RE: [CSS21] rules="all" attribute specification and border-collapse property
- Re: [CSS21] rules="all" attribute specification and border-collapse property
- Re: Automatic scheme: dark or light
- Re: [CSS21] rules="all" attribute specification and border-collapse property
- SVG and CSS Properties (SVG ACTION-2535)
- Re: CSS 2.1 test suite as downloadable archive