- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 20:41:42 -0500
- To: "Levantovsky, Vladimir" <Vladimir.Levantovsky@monotypeimaging.com>
- Cc: Jonathan Kew <jonathan@jfkew.plus.com>, Adam Twardoch <list.adam@twardoch.com>, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>, David Hyatt <hyatt@apple.com>, w3-style@boblet.net, www-style@w3.org
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Levantovsky, Vladimir <Vladimir.Levantovsky@monotypeimaging.com> wrote: > Jonathan Kew wrote: >> >> Isn't the MTX compression format used in EOT patented, which might be >> considered an obstacle to general adoption? Or has this already been >> satisfactorily resolved through some kind of free and universal >> license? >> >> Jonathan > > If adopted, MTX compression will be made available under W3C > Royalty-Free Patent licensing requirements > (http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/#sec-Requirements). Moz people, is this sufficient? Last thread ROC argued on this for quite a bit, and Zack Weinburg summed the problems up nicely in http://markmail.org/message/uklevoalxs375arf. I'm not sure whether this is a change from what it was being offered under at that time or not. ~TJ
Received on Friday, 8 May 2009 01:42:24 UTC