Re: Strawman proposal for tweaking background shorthand syntax to address position/size complexity

On 9.5.09 16:04, Jeff Walden wrote:
> I have no particular love for this proposal except that it's close to
> a patch I wrote to Gecko for this

Close no longer, as I ripped out the shorthand syntax parsing parts of that patch pending better, more final syntax here.  Moreover, this strawman requires greater parser lookahead than is otherwise necessary for parsing CSS, which is probably a bigger problem than the ugliness the proposal was intended to address, all things considered.

Jeff

Received on Monday, 11 May 2009 16:31:35 UTC