- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Fri, 01 May 2009 10:01:04 -0700
- CC: Gérard Talbot <info@gtalbot.org>, www-style@w3.org
2009/5/1 Gérard Talbot <info@gtalbot.org>: > Hello all, > > The CSS 2.1 specification, section 17.6 (and its sub-sections) should > *_clarify explicitly_* the relationship between rules="all" and > border-collapse property. I have been trying to convince IE team to > implement in their IE 8 browser this browser default rule: > > table[rules]:not([rules="all"]) {border-collapse: collapse;} > > rules="all" should apply to both border-collapse models and rules="all" > should not trigger one particular border-collapse model. > > It is my belief that rules="all", without any specified border-collapse > CSS declaration (by default, tables use the separate border-collapse > model), should render border rules around (each) cells and this is what IE > 8 fails to do and this is precisely what IE team declines to implement. > > One thing IE team replied - and I fully agree with them on this point - is > that the current CSS 2.1 specification is not clear enough, not explicit > enough on the relation between HTML 4.01 rules="all" attribute > specification and border-collapse model. rules="all" certainly implies border-collapse:collapse in Gecko. Is there any browser where it does not? (I'd be pretty surprised, because last I checked sites were depending on it.) -Boris
Received on Friday, 1 May 2009 17:02:02 UTC