www-html@w3.org from August 2006 by date

Wednesday, 30 August 2006

• Re: Design question about formats based on XHTML 2 David Woolley
• Re: Number, Date, Time, Quantity David Woolley
• Re: Number, Date, Time, Quantity Steven Pemberton
• Re: Screen readers and numbers (was RE: Number, Date, Time, Quantity) Philip TAYLOR
• Re: Number, Date, Time, Quantity Daniel Glazman
• Re: Number, Date, Time, Quantity Jukka K. Korpela
• Number, Date, Time, Quantity Hendry, Alan
• RE: IBM Position Statement on XForms and Web Forms 2.0 Francisco Monteiro
• Re[3]: Design question about formats based on XHTML 2 Laurie Voss
• Re: Re: Design question about formats based on XHTML 2 Al Gilman
• Re: Re: Design question about formats based on XHTML 2 Edward Lass
• Re: Re: Design question about formats based on XHTML 2 Peter Krantz
• Re: Design question about formats based on XHTML 2 Shane McCarron
• Re: Design question about formats based on XHTML 2 Mark Birbeck

Tuesday, 29 August 2006

• RE: Design question about formats based on XHTML 2 Paul Nelson (ATC)
• IBM Position Statement on XForms and Web Forms 2.0 John Boyer
• Re: Design question about formats based on XHTML 2 Shane McCarron
• Re: Design question about formats based on XHTML 2 David Woolley
• Re: Design question about formats based on XHTML 2 Shane McCarron
• Design question about formats based on XHTML 2 Peter Krantz

Monday, 28 August 2006

• Re: Mapping XML to XHTML - your recommendation for handling attributes? Karl Dubost
• Re: Mapping XML to XHTML - your recommendation for handling attributes? Philip TAYLOR
• Re: Mapping XML to XHTML - your recommendation for handling attributes? Karl Dubost

Sunday, 27 August 2006

• Re: Mapping XML to XHTML - your recommendation for handling attributes? Mark Birbeck
• Re: Mapping XML to XHTML - your recommendation for handling attributes? David Woolley
• Re: Mapping XML to XHTML - your recommendation for handling attributes? Mark Birbeck
• Re: Mapping XML to XHTML - your recommendation for handling attributes? David Dorward

Saturday, 26 August 2006

• Mapping XML to XHTML - your recommendation for handling attributes? Costello, Roger L.

Friday, 25 August 2006

• Re: Security Markup David Woolley
• Re: Security Markup Ahmed Saad
• Re: Security Markup David Woolley
• Re: Security Markup Ahmed Saad
• Re: Keeping the structure, Moving the meaning Re: samp, kbd, var Karl Dubost
• Re: Keeping the structure, Moving the meaning Re: samp, kbd, var David Woolley
• Re: sub/sup (was Re: samp, kbd, var) Jukka K. Korpela
• Re: samp, kbd, var David Woolley

Thursday, 24 August 2006

• Re: samp, kbd, var marvinmely@aim.com
• Re: samp, kbd, var Patrick H. Lauke
• Keeping the structure, Moving the meaning Re: samp, kbd, var Karl Dubost
• Re: samp, kbd, var Toby Inkster
• Re: samp, kbd, var David Woolley
• Re: samp, kbd, var Karl Dubost
• Re: samp, kbd, var Karl Dubost

Wednesday, 23 August 2006

• Re: samp, kbd, var Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Re: samp, kbd, var and code David Woolley
• Re: samp, kbd, var David Woolley
• Re: samp, kbd, var David Woolley
• Re: sub/sup (was Re: samp, kbd, var) David Woolley
• Re: Re: Re: samp, kbd, var and code Peter Krantz
• Re: extensibility of role/class/property/rel Al Gilman
• Re: Re: samp, kbd, var and code magick
• Re: sub/sup (was Re: samp, kbd, var) Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: samp, kbd, var Jim Jewett
• Re: Re: samp, kbd, var and code Peter Krantz
• Re: sub/sup (was Re: samp, kbd, var) magick
• Re: sub/sup (was Re: samp, kbd, var) Toby Inkster
• Re: samp, kbd, var Toby Inkster
• Re: samp, kbd, var Toby Inkster
• Re: samp, kbd, var Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: sub/sup (was Re: samp, kbd, var) Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: sub/sup (was Re: samp, kbd, var) David Woolley
• Re: samp, kbd, var David Woolley
• Re: samp, kbd, var Karl Dubost
• Re: Re: samp, kbd, var Peter Krantz
• Re: extensibility of role/class/property/rel Re: Security Markup Karl Dubost

Tuesday, 22 August 2006

• Re: sub/sup (was Re: samp, kbd, var) Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: sub/sup (was Re: samp, kbd, var) magick
• Re: sub/sup (was Re: samp, kbd, var) Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: sub/sup (was Re: samp, kbd, var) magick
• Re: sub/sup (was Re: samp, kbd, var) Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: samp, kbd, var Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: samp, kbd, var David Woolley
• Re: sub/sup (was Re: samp, kbd, var) magick
• Re: samp, kbd, var Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: samp, kbd, var Tina Holmboe
• Re: samp, kbd, var Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: samp, kbd, var Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: samp, kbd, var Tina Holmboe
• Re: sub/sup (was Re: samp, kbd, var) Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: samp, kbd, var Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: sub/sup (was Re: samp, kbd, var) Jukka K. Korpela
• Re: samp, kbd, var Jukka K. Korpela
• sub/sup (was Re: samp, kbd, var) Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: samp, kbd, var Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: samp, kbd, var Christophe Strobbe
• Re: extensibility of role/class/property/rel Re: Security Markup Mark Birbeck
• Re: samp, kbd, var Jukka K. Korpela
• samp, kbd, var Toby Inkster
• Re: extensibility of role/class/property/rel Re: Security Markup Karl Dubost
• Re: extensibility of role/class/property/rel Re: Security Markup Karl Dubost
• Re: extensibility of role/class/property/rel Re: Security Markup Al Gilman

Monday, 21 August 2006

• Re: Security Markup David Woolley
• Re: extensibility of role/class/property/rel Re: Security Markup Shane McCarron
• extensibility of role/class/property/rel Re: Security Markup Karl Dubost
• Re: Security Markup Shane McCarron
• Re: Security Markup Karl Dubost
• Re: Security Markup Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Security Markup Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Security Markup Orion Adrian
• Re: Security Markup Mark Birbeck
• Re: Security Markup Ahmed Saad
• Re: Security Markup Orion Adrian
• Re: Security Markup Mark Birbeck
• Re: Security Markup Ahmed Saad
• Re: Security Markup Toby Inkster

Sunday, 20 August 2006

• RE: Security Markup John Foliot - WATS.ca
• Re: Security Markup Mark Birbeck

Saturday, 19 August 2006

• Security Markup Ahmed Saad
• Re: Extending "Short" or "Shallow" Webpages to Effect Jumps to Anchors Within David Woolley
• Re: Extending "Short" or "Shallow" Webpages to Effect Jumps to Anchors Within Patrick H. Lauke

Friday, 18 August 2006

• Re: XHTML2 and JS ads Asbjørn Ulsberg
• Re: Extending "Short" or "Shallow" Webpages to Effect Jumps to Anchors Within magick

Thursday, 17 August 2006

• Extending "Short" or "Shallow" Webpages to Effect Jumps to Anchors Within grandslamforce@gmail.com
• List of comments for XHTML 2.0 (2006-08-17) Karl Dubost

Sunday, 13 August 2006

• RE: Abstraction and XHTML: Toward Perfect Information John Foliot - WATS.ca
• Abstraction and XHTML: Toward Perfect Information Costello, Roger L.

Friday, 11 August 2006

• Re: separator [was: xhtml2] Sebastian Mendel
• Re: xhtml2 Sebastian Mendel
• Foreign namespaces in XHTML 2.0 Eric van der Vlist

Thursday, 10 August 2006

• Re: xhtml2 David Dorward
• Re: XHTML2 and JS ads Mike Whitehurst
• Re: Re: xhtml2 Orion Adrian
• Re: Re: xhtml2 David Woolley
• Re: XHTML2 and JS ads Ian Hickson
• Re: XHTML2 and JS ads David Woolley
• Re: aliases for elements Al Gilman
• Re: xhtml2 Mike Whitehurst
• Re: xhtml2 Karl Dubost
• aliases for elements Jim Jewett
• Re: xhtml2 Sebastian Mendel
• Re: Re: xhtml2 Peter Krantz
• Re: xhtml2 David Dorward
• Re: xhtml2 Mike Whitehurst
• Re: xhtml2 Orion Adrian
• Re: xhtml2 David Dorward
• Re: xhtml2 Mike Whitehurst
• Re: xhtml2 David Dorward
• Re: xhtml2 Mike Whitehurst
• Re: xhtml2 David Dorward
• Re: xhtml2 Mike Whitehurst
• Re: Re: xhtml2 Peter Krantz
• Re: xhtml2 David Dorward
• Re: xhtml2 Mike Whitehurst
• Re: XHTML2 and JS ads Anne van Kesteren
• List of comments for XHTML role attribute module (2006-07-25) Karl Dubost
• Re: More comment on section and h David Woolley
• Re: More comment on section and h Jim Jewett
• Re: More comment on section and h Jim Jewett
• Re: xhtml2 Tina Holmboe

Wednesday, 9 August 2006

• Re: More comment on section and h Jim Jewett
• Re: xhtml2 Toby Inkster
• Re: More comment on section and h David Woolley
• Re: XHTML2 and JS ads magick
• Re: XHTML2 and JS ads Steven Pemberton
• Re: More comment on section and h Al Gilman
• Re: More comment on section and h Sjoerd Visscher
• Re: Comment on last XHTML 2 draft, section 3.2 Daniel Glazman
• Re: Comment on last XHTML 2 draft, section 3.2 Sebastian Redl
• Re: Location of the RELAX NG schema for XHTML 2.0 Eric van der Vlist
• Location of the RELAX NG schema for XHTML 2.0 Eric van der Vlist
• More comment on section and h Daniel Glazman
• Re: Comment on last XHTML2 draft, content model and default styles of 'section' Anne van Kesteren
• Comment on last XHTML2 draft, content model and default styles of 'section' Daniel Glazman
• Comment on last XHTML 2 draft, section 3.2 Daniel Glazman
• Support of Browsers Re: xhtml2 Karl Dubost

Tuesday, 8 August 2006

• Re: XHTML2 and JS ads Ian Hickson
• Re: XHTML2 and JS ads David Woolley
• XHTML2 and JS ads magick
• Re: HTML has, probably, confusing date format incerti auctoris
• Re: HTML has, probably, confusing date format Sebastian Mendel
• Re: section/heading reformulation Johannes Koch

Monday, 7 August 2006

• Re: section/heading reformulation Mike Whitehurst

Tuesday, 8 August 2006

• Re: xhtml2 David Dorward

Monday, 7 August 2006

• xhtml2 solveig

Sunday, 6 August 2006

• Re: HTML has, probably, confusing date format Cyril

Monday, 7 August 2006

• Re: CSS Borders Mike Bremford
• Re: CSS Borders Lorenzo De Tomasi
• Re: section/heading reformulation Toby Inkster
• Re: section/heading reformulation Jonathan Worent

Sunday, 6 August 2006

• Re: section/heading reformulation Frank Hellenkamp

Saturday, 5 August 2006

• CSS Borders Truly Blessed
• [XHTML Basic 1.1 Last Call WD] comments on XHTML Basic Working Draft July 2006 Yamakami, T.
• feedback on XHTML 1.1 basic Charles McCathieNevile

Friday, 4 August 2006

• Re: XHTML Applications and XML Processors [was Re: xhtml 2.0 noscript] Ian Hickson
• XHTML Basic 1.1 Last Call comment Alastair Angwin
• Re: section/heading reformulation Jonathan Worent
• Re: section/heading reformulation Orion Adrian
• Re: section/heading reformulation Jonathan Worent
• Re: section/heading reformulation Jonathan Worent
• Re: section/heading reformulation mr.hartung.acc10@streber24.de
• Re: XHTML Applications and XML Processors [was Re: xhtml 2.0 noscript] Jukka K. Korpela
• Re: XHTML Applications and XML Processors [was Re: xhtml 2.0 noscript] Karl Dubost
• Re: XHTML Applications and XML Processors [was Re: xhtml 2.0 noscript] Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: XHTML Applications and XML Processors [was Re: xhtml 2.0 noscript] Karl Dubost

Thursday, 3 August 2006

• Re: XHTML Applications and XML Processors [was Re: xhtml 2.0 noscript] David Woolley
• Re: XHTML Applications and XML Processors [was Re: xhtml 2.0 noscript] Jim Ley
• Re: XHTML Applications and XML Processors [was Re: xhtml 2.0 noscript] Orion Adrian
• Re: XHTML Applications and XML Processors [was Re: xhtml 2.0 noscript] Shane McCarron
• Re: XHTML Basic 1.1 - Editorial Error Steven Pemberton
• XHTML Basic 1.1 - Editorial Error Bennett.Marks@nokia.com
• Re: XHTML Applications and XML Processors [was Re: xhtml 2.0 noscript] Jim Ley
• RE: XHTML Applications and XML Processors [was Re: xhtml 2.0 noscript] Peter Normann
• Re: XHTML Applications and XML Processors [was Re: xhtml 2.0 noscript] Orion Adrian
• Re: XHTML Applications and XML Processors [was Re: xhtml 2.0 noscript] Jim Ley
• Re: XHTML Applications and XML Processors [was Re: xhtml 2.0 noscript] Orion Adrian
• Re: XHTML Applications and XML Processors [was Re: xhtml 2.0 noscript] Jim Ley
• RE: XHTML Applications and XML Processors [was Re: xhtml 2.0 noscript] Ian Hickson
• RE: XHTML Applications and XML Processors [was Re: xhtml 2.0 noscript] John Foliot - WATS.ca
• Re: XHTML Applications and XML Processors [was Re: xhtml 2.0 noscript] Bjoern Hoehrmann
• RE: XHTML Applications and XML Processors [was Re: xhtml 2.0 noscript] Ian Hickson
• RE: XHTML Applications and XML Processors [was Re: xhtml 2.0 noscript] John Foliot - WATS.ca
• Re: XHTML Applications and XML Processors [was Re: xhtml 2.0 noscript] Bjoern Hoehrmann
• RE: XHTML Applications and XML Processors [was Re: xhtml 2.0 noscript] John Foliot - WATS.ca
• Re: XHTML Applications and XML Processors [was Re: xhtml 2.0 noscript] Bjoern Hoehrmann

Wednesday, 2 August 2006

• Re: XHTML Applications and XML Processors [was Re: xhtml 2.0 noscript] Jim Ley
• Re: XHTML Applications and XML Processors [was Re: xhtml 2.0 noscript] Jim Ley
• Re: XHTML Applications and XML Processors [was Re: xhtml 2.0 noscript] Ian Hickson
• RE: XHTML Applications and XML Processors [was Re: xhtml 2.0 noscript] John Foliot
• Re: XHTML Applications and XML Processors [was Re: xhtml 2.0 noscript] Mark Birbeck
• Re: XHTML Applications and XML Processors [was Re: xhtml 2.0 noscript] Jim Ley
• Re: XHTML Applications and XML Processors [was Re: xhtml 2.0 noscript] Jim Ley
• Re: XHTML Applications and XML Processors [was Re: xhtml 2.0 noscript] Mark Birbeck
• Re: XHTML Applications and XML Processors [was Re: xhtml 2.0 noscript] Orion Adrian
• Re: XHTML Applications and XML Processors [was Re: xhtml 2.0 noscript] Jim Ley
• Re: XHTML Applications and XML Processors [was Re: xhtml 2.0 noscript] Jim Ley
• RE: XHTML Applications and XML Processors [was Re: xhtml 2.0 noscript] John Foliot
• Re: XHTML Applications and XML Processors [was Re: xhtml 2.0 noscript] Mark Birbeck
• Re: XML together with XHTML Steven Pemberton
• XML together with XHTML Robert Leif

Tuesday, 1 August 2006

• Re: XHTML 1.1 modularization last call: basic tables module Frank Ellermann
• XHTML 1.1 modularization last call: basic tables module Frank Ellermann
• XHTML 1.1 modularization last call: legacy module Frank Ellermann

Last message date: Wednesday, 30 August 2006 21:35:09 UTC