- From: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 07:18:41 +0100 (BST)
- To: www-html@w3.org
> - These semantics of meaning are useful > - These should not be element but role/property attribute values. I'd say that was in conflict with the original SGML concept, and actually represents a move towards a presentational language. I don't really like role, because it seems to be an abdication of responsibility, which could result in every web site having its own definition of what role names are and what they mean. I think I would much rather have first class elements, but if the elements aren't considered general purpose enough, there should be standards profiles defined, which, for example, had different profiles for say; e-commerce sites; corporate sites; informational sites; search engines, leaf node pure documents, etc. Each profile could be made of several modules, but authors would be expected to use a complete profile, not make their own selection from modules. I'm not convinced this will work, though, because most authors seem to want to confuse CSS, EcmaScript, object models, and Flash into a single thing that they call HTML.
Received on Thursday, 24 August 2006 06:35:45 UTC