- From: Jonathan Worent <jworent@yahoo.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 07:50:17 -0700 (PDT)
- To: mr.hartung.acc10@streber24.de
- Cc: HTML Mailing List <www-html@w3.org>
My interpretation may be way off but this is how I understand it: Everything following a heading is related to that heading until another heading of the same rank is discovered. There are two types of sections, explicit (using <section>) and implied. So for example: <h>heading 1</h> <section> <p>It is explicitly stated that everything int this section, including other sections and headings are related to the previous heading</p> --- mr.hartung.acc10@streber24.de wrote: > > Johannes Koch wrote: > > > I thought, the way to go with XHTML 2 was > > > > <section> > > <h>heading of section_1</h> > > <!--this is section_1--> > > <section> > > <h>heading of section_1.1</h> > > <!--this is section_1.1--> > > </section> > > </section> > > > > You are partially right and me, I ve been > partially wrong, but both only partially, > so please take a look at the example > given in the sepcs: > > <body> > > <h>Events</h> > > <section> > > <h>Introduction</h> > <p>....</p> > <h>Specifying events</h> > <p>...</p> > > <section> > <h>Attaching events to the handler</h> > <p>...</p> > </section> > > <section> > <h>Attaching events to the listener</h> > <p>...</p> > </section> > > <section> > <h>Specifying the binding elsewhere</h> > <p>...</p> > </section> > > </section> > > </body> > > Does it mean, that on the "h1-level" the <body> > tag fullfills the <section> job? Seems so. > > Maybe it is tought that way, but I think it is > a little bit vague and unprecise, as <body> and > <section> belong to different modules (document, > structure) with different content model, somehow > different meaning and so on. > > As I take consideration in the field of moving > whole sections between different levels, this > current solution seems to me to heavily fixed > on the document and not allowing e.g. the level1 > section to be moved to another level (where does > it end? - possibly long before </body>). > > (a) So I would prefer a solution with <h> only > allowed inside a <section> so that you can > always identify the relationship. In the > example above, where should an alogrithm know > beginning (o.k. may be in follow-up to the > heading, but thats loose structure instead of > XML usual nesting) but mainly: the END of the > h1-section? inside a document there can be > appendix etc before the <body> tag closes! > > (b) Furthermore I would demand for a restriction > that allows only one <h> per <section>. This > is not forbidden currently. But I consider it > necessarry to avoid structures like: > > <section> > <h>The heading</h> > <h>Another heading - but wherefore?</h> > <p>...</p> > <h>And once again.</h> > </section> > > > What do you think thereof? > > Yours sincerely, > Mr B S Hartung, Germany, Dresden > > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Received on Friday, 4 August 2006 14:50:31 UTC