- From: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:17:05 +0100 (BST)
- To: www-html@w3.org
> > Not that I can be bothered to start counting them, but I'd submit to > you the there is more wealth of knowledge, specialisms, areas of > interest, etc which is being conveyed by web sites worldwide that is By number of hits or data volume transferred I wuould guess they are in an a minority compared with e-commerce sites. Whilst e-commerce sites are usually very bad examples of good coding practice, they generally all have forms and help pages for those forms. Those forms normally require user chosen free text input, which should be represented by a <var> in the help file. > quite distinct from anything technical requiring these elements. > Mathematics, chemistry, logic, philosophy, medicine...all these would > also benefit from their own elements to accurately mark up their > content, so why is it that computing technology is "built in" to XHTML > 2.0 while these others aren't? Just because "you write XHTML 2.0 on a > computer"?
Received on Wednesday, 23 August 2006 22:40:59 UTC