- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 09:18:02 +0900
- To: XHTML-Liste <www-html@w3.org>
Le 8 août 06 à 19:07, David Dorward a écrit :
> Onand I want to use it in my own little project. But for doing that I
>> need a browser that do support xhtml2. Do you know of any ?
>
> I'm pretty sure there aren't any.
That's interesting.
What would be a browser which supports XHTML 2.0?
I think the valuable support should be on the side of search engines
and authoring tools, more than browsers (there is a need for support
too, don't make me wrong.)
Browsers are interested more by functionnal features (like a link or
an accessibility feature). They are pretty much agnostic with regards
to the semantics. Maybe there is a good opportunity to separate what
are the things which require an action from a (desktop/mobile)
browser and those which do not.
Defining the [classes of products][1][2] help to know what you have
to implement and what you can consider but not necessary have to
implement in a functionnal way.
Example:
There's a "cite" element in the page, which has been used hopefully
in a conformant manner of the specification, but in my browser I
don't necessary need to do anything with it on the renderer part. CSS
being more important here.
if the "cite" element has an "href" attribute , then for the browser
there's a need to implement a possible action.
So basically there aren't any for now, but there is an interesting
question about how to implement for each class of products. Maybe it
would help the implementers a bit.
[1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/qaframe-spec/#implement-principle
[2]: http://www.w3.org/TR/spec-variability/#spec-cat-cop
--
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Wednesday, 9 August 2006 00:18:23 UTC