- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 09:18:02 +0900
- To: XHTML-Liste <www-html@w3.org>
Le 8 août 06 à 19:07, David Dorward a écrit : > Onand I want to use it in my own little project. But for doing that I >> need a browser that do support xhtml2. Do you know of any ? > > I'm pretty sure there aren't any. That's interesting. What would be a browser which supports XHTML 2.0? I think the valuable support should be on the side of search engines and authoring tools, more than browsers (there is a need for support too, don't make me wrong.) Browsers are interested more by functionnal features (like a link or an accessibility feature). They are pretty much agnostic with regards to the semantics. Maybe there is a good opportunity to separate what are the things which require an action from a (desktop/mobile) browser and those which do not. Defining the [classes of products][1][2] help to know what you have to implement and what you can consider but not necessary have to implement in a functionnal way. Example: There's a "cite" element in the page, which has been used hopefully in a conformant manner of the specification, but in my browser I don't necessary need to do anything with it on the renderer part. CSS being more important here. if the "cite" element has an "href" attribute , then for the browser there's a need to implement a possible action. So basically there aren't any for now, but there is an interesting question about how to implement for each class of products. Maybe it would help the implementers a bit. [1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/qaframe-spec/#implement-principle [2]: http://www.w3.org/TR/spec-variability/#spec-cat-cop -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/ *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Wednesday, 9 August 2006 00:18:23 UTC