- From: Jonathan Worent <jworent@yahoo.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 08:07:44 -0700 (PDT)
- To: mr.hartung.acc10@streber24.de
- Cc: HTML Mailing List <www-html@w3.org>
Oops hit tab, space and accidently sent that last one before I was finished. To the list moderator: Please remove the uncompleted message. My interpretation may be way off but this is how I understand it: Everything following a heading is related to that heading until another heading of the same rank is discovered. There are two types of sections, explicit (using <section>) and implied. So for example: <h>heading 1</h> <section> <p>It is explicitly stated that everything int this section, including other sections and headings are related to the previous heading</p> <h>sub heading 1</h> <p>it is implied that this paragraph is related to sub heading 1 because it directly follows it</p> <h>sub heading 2</h> <p>we have started a new implied section that relates to sub heading 2.<p> <p>This paragraph is still related to the sub heading 2.</p> </section> <section> <p>This new section means that everything within is somehow different than the previous section (if it isn't there would be no need to start a new section), yet still related to heading 1 because a new heading of the same rank a heading 1 was not specified. </section> Thats how I see it. I don't think its a good thing that this new structure can be interpreted in different ways. The spec needs to be made more clear. An outline that the code produces might help. Jonathan Worent Webmaster www.epfmc.org jonathan@epfmc.org jworent@yahoo.com __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Received on Friday, 4 August 2006 15:11:04 UTC