- From: Paul Nelson (ATC) <paulnel@winse.microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 13:28:06 -0700
- To: "Shane McCarron" <shane@aptest.com>, "Peter Krantz" <peter.krantz@gmail.com>
- CC: <www-html@w3.org>, "Linda Mao" <lindamao@microsoft.com>
Shane, If you are saying that the "role" can be used by anybody for anything they want you will effectively generate significant disadvantage for the accessible community. A property that needs to be supported by browsers and other systems to help the assistive technology tools will be so flooded with other uses/misuses that there will be negative impact on those who need to rely on that functionality to use web content. I hope that the meaning of roles remains exactly as it is worded below and is not changed to be defined as "all things for all people". Paul -----Original Message----- From: www-html-request@w3.org [mailto:www-html-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Shane McCarron Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 10:08 PM To: Peter Krantz Cc: www-html@w3.org Subject: Re: Design question about formats based on XHTML 2 No, I think you are correct that the role attribute is the way to go. Just define a taxonomy for roles in your namespace. However, I agree that the text in the description of the role attribute is misleading. I will effect repairs. Peter Krantz wrote: > > Hi! > > In a project we are looking at XHTML 2 as the foundation for a > document format in the legal domain. XHTML 2 is a great starting point > as it is a generic document format covering most of our markup needs. > > In our domain we would like to express that some section elements are > of a specific type. The type belongs to a namespace. The function of > the section element is the same but we would like to be able to > extract sections of this specific type. > > What would be a good way to markup our sections? The role attribute > sounds like a candidate but looking at the XHTML2 specification it > does not feel right ("It is used by applications and assistive > technologies to determine the purpose of UI widgets."). Is the class > attribute the way to go? > > Kind regards, > > Peter -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Tuesday, 29 August 2006 23:02:13 UTC