- From: Peter Krantz <peter.krantz@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:53:31 +0200
- To: www-html@w3.org
On 8/30/06, Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com> wrote: > > Or, in other words, @role; its not just for accessibility any more (sm). > Am I interpreting it correctly if I use it like this: <section role="legal:paragraph">... ...provided that the "legal" namespace has already been established in the document. This sounds interesting and feels coherent with the naming of the role attribute. But, if this is the case, then the wording in section 26.1[1] in current version of the specification should change. Specifically the phrase "It is used by applications and assistive technologies to determine the purpose of UI widgets". Kind regards, Peter Krantz [1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/mod-roleAttribute.html#col_Role
Received on Wednesday, 30 August 2006 12:53:40 UTC