- From: Al Gilman <Alfred.S.Gilman@IEEE.org>
- Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 15:50:28 -0400
- To: "Jim Jewett" <jimjjewett@gmail.com>
- Cc: XHTML-Liste <www-html@w3.org>
At 11:00 AM -0400 8/10/06, Jim Jewett wrote: >The current draft offers both id and xml:id, but says not to use both ... > >Is there any way for an xml module to alias or import an element, so >that the unnamespaced version (or the version in its own namespace) is >seen as equivalent to a specified element from elsewhere? I think the answer is that you can. For expert advice on how; and perhaps when to do this and when not to do it, you might try to wake up the list at <public-schemata-users@w3.org>. For an idea of what they are about, you could browse http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-schemata-users/2005Oct/thread.html#3 .. first, if you wish. Al PS: basic how-to-join etc. is findable from http://www.w3.org/Mail/Request >id is the obvious justification, but xml:base and xml:lang are also >fairly common, and I think it might help to resolve some of the >problems with xlink and xinclude. > >-jJ
Received on Thursday, 10 August 2006 19:50:37 UTC