public-webapps-github@w3.org from June 2019 by author

=JeffH

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Web Authentication Feature Detection (#383) (Monday, 10 June)

Aaron Gustafson

• Re: [w3c/manifest] More restrictive standalone mode (#770) (Sunday, 30 June)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Is prefer_related_applications too simplistic? (#365) (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add shortcuts feature to the explainer and spec (#768) (Friday, 21 June)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add shortcuts feature to the explainer and spec (#768) (Friday, 21 June)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add shortcuts feature to the explainer and spec (#768) (Friday, 21 June)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add shortcuts feature to the explainer and spec (#768) (Friday, 21 June)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add shortcuts feature to the explainer and spec (#768) (Friday, 21 June)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add shortcuts feature to the explainer and spec (#768) (Friday, 21 June)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add shortcuts feature to the explainer and spec (#768) (Friday, 21 June)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Adding shortcuts to the explainer (#768) (Thursday, 20 June)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] App shortcuts / actions (#582) (Thursday, 20 June)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Adding shortcuts to the explainer (#768) (Thursday, 20 June)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Adding shortcuts to the explainer (#768) (Thursday, 20 June)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Adding shortcuts to the explainer (#768) (Thursday, 20 June)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] App shortcuts / actions (#582) (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Adding shortcuts to the explainer (#768) (Friday, 14 June)
• [w3c/manifest] Adding shortcuts to the explainer (#768) (Friday, 14 June)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add Manifest option for specifying browser app picker behavior (#764) (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Support a way to update explicitly (#446) (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add a `color_scheme` member to `ImageResource` (#758) (Tuesday, 4 June)

aaronsn

• Re: [whatwg/fetch] More informative error types (#526) (Thursday, 6 June)

Aayush Chawla

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Allow custom "get the parent" algorithms for EventTargets (#583) (Friday, 28 June)

Adam Langley

• [w3ctag/design-reviews] Web Authentication Feature Detection (#383) (Thursday, 6 June)

Adam Rice

• Re: [heycam/webidl] Add async_iterable support (#720) (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Add async_iterable support (#720) (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Switching to Web IDL (#963) (Monday, 10 June)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Should ReadableStreamDefaultReader be exposed? (#586) (Monday, 10 June)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] WebIDL (#1002) (Monday, 10 June)
• [whatwg/streams] WebIDL (#1002) (Monday, 10 June)

Addison Phillips

• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Use Infra terms to simplify text. (#275) (Wednesday, 12 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Use Infra terms to simplify text. (#275) (Wednesday, 12 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Use Infra terms to simplify text. (#275) (Tuesday, 11 June)

Adrián de la Rosa

• Re: [w3c/manifest] Support a way to update explicitly (#446) (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Support a way to update explicitly (#446) (Tuesday, 4 June)

alancutter

• Re: [w3c/manifest] Is prefer_related_applications too simplistic? (#365) (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Is prefer_related_applications too simplistic? (#365) (Thursday, 27 June)

Alex Rodriguez

• Re: [GoogleChrome/puppeteer] Query nodes within shadow roots (#858) (Friday, 14 June)

aliams

• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Editorial: Add note about close() being idempotent. (#281) (Friday, 14 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Editorial: Replace flag set/unset with true/false. (#279) (Thursday, 13 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Use Infra terms to simplify text. (#275) (Wednesday, 12 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Use Infra terms to simplify text. (#275) (Wednesday, 12 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Editorial: Simplify wording around async request invocation (#278) (Wednesday, 12 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Editorial: Simplify 'steps to' (#277) (Wednesday, 12 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Factor common steps out of add()/put(). (#269) (Thursday, 6 June)

Alice

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Pointerevent extension (#346) (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Pointerevent extension (#346) (Wednesday, 26 June)

alimsaeed10

• [w3c/ServiceWorker] @alimsaeed2020 (#1439) (Friday, 21 June)

Anatoli Babenia

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Custom 'void' or self-closing elements (HTML parser changes) (#624) (Friday, 14 June)

Andreas Plesch

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Custom 'void' or self-closing elements (HTML parser changes) (#624) (Monday, 3 June)

Andrew Sutherland

• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Find a way for service workers to get their current state (#1077) (Thursday, 20 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Registering service workers for unique origins? (#1437) (Thursday, 20 June)

Anne van Kesteren

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Workers and non-JavaScript modules (#822) (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Add an option to include frozen documents. (#1442) (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Copy the DOM XPath interfaces from the WHATWG wiki (#763) (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Request's associated element (#912) (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Remove brief to unhide the note in fetch-redirect (#914) (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Handle asynchronous modules (top-level await). (#1444) (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Handle asynchronous modules (top-level await). (#1444) (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Consider requiring optional dictionary defaulting explicitly (#602) (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Custom attribute names conflicting with built-in attribute names (#654) (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] How to define APIs only for custom element authors (#758) (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: [w3c/uievents] Should an element remain focused and receive key events if it's display:none-ed? (#236) (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Workers and non-JavaScript modules (#822) (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Add an option to include frozen documents. (#1442) (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] JavaScript Memory API (#386) (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Handle asynchronous modules (top-level await). (#1444) (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] JavaScript Memory API (#386) (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Warning: header & stale-while-revalidate (#913) (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Let Origin header honor referrer policy for non CORS request (#908) (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Let Origin header honor referrer policy for non CORS request (#908) (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Let Origin header honor referrer policy for non CORS request (#908) (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Warning: header & stale-while-revalidate (#913) (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] JavaScript Memory API (#386) (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Let Origin header honor referrer policy for non CORS request (#908) (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Add delegatesFocus init to attachShadow and flag to ShadowRoot (#768) (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Let Origin header honor referrer policy for non CORS request (#908) (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Let Origin header honor referrer policy for non CORS request (#908) (Wednesday, 26 June)
• [heycam/webidl] Use Oxford comma (#743) (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Add delegatesFocus init to attachShadow and flag to ShadowRoot (#768) (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Add delegatesFocus init to attachShadow and flag to ShadowRoot (#768) (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Make decode() and encodeInto() accept SharedArrayBuffer-backed views (#172) (Monday, 24 June)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Updating Element Registration. (#820) (Monday, 24 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Looking for some clarity on Promise<void> (#737) (Monday, 24 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] NonAnyType vs SingleType as home of PromiseType ε alternative (#740) (Monday, 24 June)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] CORS safelisting trace context header (#911) (Thursday, 20 June)
• Re: [whatwg/storage] Multiple boxes (#2) (Thursday, 20 June)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Let Origin header honor referrer policy for non CORS request (#908) (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Let Origin header honor referrer policy for non CORS request (#908) (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Consider not running the validator on all the encoding tables? (#178) (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Suppress bad-Unicode HTML checker warnings (#179) (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Implementation status for DOMError? (#766) (Tuesday, 18 June)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Implementation status for DOMError? (#766) (Tuesday, 18 June)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Header to opt out of opaque redirect (#601) (Tuesday, 18 June)
• [whatwg/fetch] Review Draft Publication: June 2019 (#910) (Monday, 17 June)
• [whatwg/encoding] Review Draft Publication: June 2019 (#177) (Monday, 17 June)
• [whatwg/dom] Review Draft Publication: June 2019 (#767) (Monday, 17 June)
• Re: [whatwg/storage] Add a Security and Privacy section. (#72) (Friday, 14 June)
• Re: [whatwg/storage] Add UsageDetails dictionary (#69) (Friday, 14 June)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Let Origin header honor referrer policy for non CORS request (#908) (Friday, 14 June)
• [heycam/webidl] Meta: use "good first issue" label (#736) (Friday, 14 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Async Clipboard - image/delayed content (#350) (Wednesday, 12 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Top-level await integration for ServiceWorkers running modules (#1407) (Tuesday, 11 June)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Implementation status for DOMError? (#766) (Monday, 10 June)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] More informative error types (#526) (Friday, 7 June)
• [w3c/FileAPI] Refactor text() et al to share more infrastructure with Fetch (#133) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Pouri88 (#765) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Limit the length of the Referer header (#903) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Let Origin header honor referrer policy for non CORS request (#908) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow tree encapsulation and Element Timing (#816) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Added URLs example.com/demo/ column to table (#441) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow tree encapsulation and Element Timing (#816) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Added URLs example.com/demo/ column to table (#441) (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Added URLs example.com/demo/ column to table (#441) (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Export concept of collapsed (#764) (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Export concept of collapsed (#764) (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Add "disable shadow" flag check to Element.attachShadow() (#760) (Tuesday, 4 June)

Anthony Nadalin

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Verifiable Credentials Data Model 1.0 (#343) (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Verifiable Credentials Data Model 1.0 (#343) (Thursday, 27 June)

Anton Platonov

• [whatwg/dom] A way for createAttribute() to bypass XML Name validation in HTML documents (#769) (Wednesday, 26 June)

Arno Gourdol

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Custom attribute names conflicting with built-in attribute names (#654) (Friday, 28 June)

Asa Kusuma

• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Experimenting with abortable algorithms (#1443) (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Create a Kill Service Workers algorithm (#1440) (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Experimenting with abortable algorithms (#1443) (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Create a Kill Service Workers algorithm (#1440) (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Experimenting with abortable algorithms (#1443) (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Export the Clear Registration Algorithm (#1438) (Sunday, 23 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Export the Clear Registration Algorithm (#1438) (Sunday, 23 June)
• [w3c/ServiceWorker] Create a Kill Service Workers algorithm (#1440) (Sunday, 23 June)
• Re: [whatwg/storage] Multiple buckets (#2) (Friday, 21 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Export the Clear Registration Algorithm (#1438) (Friday, 21 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Export the Clear Registration Algorithm (#1438) (Friday, 21 June)
• [w3c/ServiceWorker] Export the Clear Registration Algorithm (#1438) (Friday, 21 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] A way to immediately unregister a service worker (#614) (Tuesday, 18 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] A way to immediately unregister a service worker (#614) (Wednesday, 12 June)

ashimura

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Web of Things (WoT) Architecture (#355) (Friday, 21 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Web of Things (WoT) Thing Description (#357) (Friday, 21 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Web of Things (WoT) Architecture (#355) (Thursday, 20 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Web of Things (WoT) Thing Description (#357) (Thursday, 20 June)

Ben Kelly

• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Add an option to include frozen documents. (#1442) (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Add an option to include frozen documents. (#1442) (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Add an option to include frozen documents. (#1442) (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Add an option to include frozen documents. (#1442) (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Add an option to include frozen documents. (#1442) (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Experimenting with abortable algorithms (#1443) (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Warning: header & stale-while-revalidate (#913) (Monday, 24 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Add an option to include frozen documents. (#1442) (Monday, 24 June)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Request's associated element (#912) (Monday, 24 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Registering service workers for unique origins? (#1437) (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Adding self.serviceWorker to service workers. (#1426) (Thursday, 13 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] A way to immediately unregister a service worker (#614) (Thursday, 13 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] A way to immediately unregister a service worker (#614) (Thursday, 13 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Top-level await integration for ServiceWorkers running modules (#1407) (Tuesday, 11 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Central algorithm for updating service worker state and registrations (#1416) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Object equality of service worker registrations (#1420) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] "Unregister" operation may be interrupted by `ServiceWorker#postMessage` (#1146) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Central algorithm for updating service worker state and registrations (#1416) (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Central algorithm for updating service worker state and registrations (#1416) (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Central algorithm for updating service worker state and registrations (#1416) (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] What happens to the request body if the fetch isn't handled? (#1191) (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Central algorithm for updating service worker state and registrations (#1416) (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Central algorithm for updating service worker state and registrations (#1416) (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Central algorithm for updating service worker state and registrations (#1416) (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Central algorithm for updating service worker state and registrations (#1416) (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Central algorithm for updating service worker state and registrations (#1416) (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Central algorithm for updating service worker state and registrations (#1416) (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Central algorithm for updating service worker state and registrations (#1416) (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Central algorithm for updating service worker state and registrations (#1416) (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Should register() trigger an update if only updateViaCache changes? (#1414) (Monday, 3 June)

Boaz

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] A toast UI element (#385) (Thursday, 13 June)

Boris Zbarsky

• Re: [heycam/webidl] Define a way to specify a default value for dictionaries (the literal "{}") and require it to be specified for the dictionary arguments that are required to be optional. (#750) (Friday, 28 June)
• [heycam/webidl] Define a way to specify a default value for dictionaries (the literal "{}") and require it to be specified for the dictionary arguments that are required to be optional. (#750) (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Consider requiring optional dictionary defaulting explicitly (#602) (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Is it true that dictionaries can't have a default value specified? (#585) (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Add async_iterable support (#720) (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Add async_iterable support (#720) (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Explicitly include annotated types in the various type categories. (#747) (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] NonAnyType vs SingleType as home of PromiseType ε alternative (#740) (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Should make it clear that [Global] and [Constructor] can't coexist (#744) (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Disallow Promise types in unions at the syntax level. (#746) (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Should make it clear that [Global] and [Constructor] can't coexist (#744) (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Disallow combining Global with Constructor/NamedConstructor. (#745) (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Disallow combining Global with Constructor/NamedConstructor. (#745) (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Sort out when dictionaries and records should have default values (#76) (Thursday, 27 June)
• [heycam/webidl] Should make it clear that [Global] and [Constructor] can't coexist (#744) (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Add async_iterable support (#720) (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Add async_iterable support (#720) (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Inconsistent enumerability on keys/values/entries and friends (#738) (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Should iterator prototype object next functions be enumerable? (#739) (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Should iterator prototype object next functions be enumerable? (#739) (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Looking for some clarity on Promise<void> (#737) (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] NonAnyType vs SingleType as home of PromiseType ε alternative (#740) (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Make [SameObject] beneficial (#212) (Monday, 24 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Reduce the restrictions on members whose names match auto-generated properties (#726) (Sunday, 23 June)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Should URLSearchParams be [Serializable]? (#442) (Sunday, 23 June)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Should URLSearchParams be [Serializable]? (#442) (Sunday, 23 June)
• [whatwg/url] Should URLSearchParams be [Serializable]? (#442) (Sunday, 23 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Add async_iterable support (#720) (Wednesday, 19 June)

Brett Zamir

• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] boolean should be a valid key (#76) (Monday, 17 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Editorial: Add note about close() being idempotent. (#281) (Saturday, 15 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Factor common steps out of add()/put(). (#269) (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] `getAll()` with both key and value (or index key and primary key) (#206) (Wednesday, 5 June)

Caleb Williams

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Expose and API for syncing attributes and properties (#823) (Friday, 28 June)
• [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Expose and API for syncing attributes and properties (#823) (Friday, 28 June)

Caridy Patiño

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Workers and non-JavaScript modules (#822) (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Discussion: child elements cannot determine whether they are "active" or not (#817) (Saturday, 8 June)

Chris Mills

• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Warning: header & stale-while-revalidate (#913) (Thursday, 27 June)

crertel

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] A toast UI element (#385) (Saturday, 15 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] A toast UI element (#385) (Thursday, 13 June)

cybai

• Re: [heycam/webidl] Mark DOMException as serializable (#732) (Wednesday, 5 June)

cynthia

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Spatial Navigation (#287) (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Spatial Navigation (#287) (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Spatial Navigation (#287) (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] FetchEvent.resultingClientId (#307) (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] FetchEvent.resultingClientId (#307) (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Feature Policy JS introspection API (#292) (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Alternative Text for CSS Generated Content (#351) (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Alternative Text for CSS Generated Content (#351) (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Pointerevent extension (#346) (Wednesday, 26 June)

Dan Clark

• [w3c/webcomponents] Workers and non-JavaScript modules (#822) (Thursday, 27 June)

Daniel Appelquist

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Badging API (#387) (Monday, 24 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Badging API (#387) (Monday, 24 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] A toast UI element (#385) (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] A toast UI element (#385) (Friday, 14 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] A toast UI element (#385) (Friday, 14 June)

Daniel Bates

• Re: [w3c/uievents] Should an element remain focused and receive key events if it's display:none-ed? (#236) (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: [w3c/uievents] Should an element remain focused and receive key events if it's display:none-ed? (#236) (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: [w3c/uievents] Should an element remain focused and receive key events if it's display:none-ed? (#236) (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: [w3c/uievents] Should an element remained focused and receive key events if it's display:none-ed? (#236) (Thursday, 27 June)
• [w3c/uievents] Should an element remained focused and receive key events if it's display:none-ed? (#236) (Thursday, 27 June)

Daniel Ehrenberg

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Workers and non-JavaScript modules (#822) (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Handle asynchronous modules (top-level await). (#1444) (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Workers and non-JavaScript modules (#822) (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Workers and non-JavaScript modules (#822) (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Handle asynchronous modules (top-level await). (#1444) (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Top-level await integration for ServiceWorkers running modules (#1407) (Tuesday, 18 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] [wip] First pass at adding internal slots (#495) (Thursday, 13 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Top-level await integration for ServiceWorkers running modules (#1407) (Tuesday, 11 June)

Daniel Veditz

• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Limit the length of the Referer header (#903) (Thursday, 6 June)

Danila Shutov

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [WebDriver] Testability of web components (#771) (Thursday, 20 June)

Darien Maillet Valentine

• [heycam/webidl] CallbackInterfaceMembers grammar question (typo?) (#751) (Sunday, 30 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Disallow Promise types in unions at the syntax level. (#746) (Saturday, 29 June)
• [heycam/webidl] NonAnyType vs SingleType as home of PromiseType ε alternative (#740) (Monday, 24 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Looking for some clarity on Promise<void> (#737) (Sunday, 23 June)
• [heycam/webidl] Looking for some clarity on Promise<void> (#737) (Saturday, 22 June)

Darwin Huang

• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Consider using DataTransferItemList instead of DataTransfer (#72) (Thursday, 13 June)

Dave Tapuska

• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Add an option to include frozen documents. (#1442) (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Add an option to include frozen documents. (#1442) (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Add an option to include frozen documents. (#1442) (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Add an option to include frozen documents. (#1442) (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Add an option to include frozen documents. (#1442) (Monday, 24 June)
• [w3c/ServiceWorker] Add an option to include frozen documents. (#1442) (Monday, 24 June)

David Fahlander

• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] boolean should be a valid key (#76) (Tuesday, 18 June)

Denis Ah-Kang

• [w3c/selection-api] Fix recipient's email (#110) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] add encrypted token (#46) (Thursday, 6 June)

Diego Ferreiro Val

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow tree encapsulation and Element Timing (#816) (Wednesday, 5 June)

Domenic Denicola

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Workers and non-JavaScript modules (#822) (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add global reflecting attributes to ElementInternals? (#821) (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Use IDL this for the synthetic forEach method. (#742) (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] A way for createAttribute() to bypass XML Name validation in HTML documents (#769) (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Rename Module.Instantiate to Module.Link (#741) (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Add delegatesFocus init to attachShadow and flag to ShadowRoot (#768) (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Add delegatesFocus init to attachShadow and flag to ShadowRoot (#768) (Tuesday, 25 June)
• [heycam/webidl] Should iterator prototype object next functions be enumerable? (#739) (Monday, 24 June)
• [heycam/webidl] Inconsistent enumerability on keys/values/entries and friends (#738) (Monday, 24 June)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Should URLSearchParams be [Serializable]? (#442) (Sunday, 23 June)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Review Draft Publication: June 2019 (#177) (Thursday, 20 June)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Review Draft Publication: June 2019 (#177) (Thursday, 20 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Add async_iterable support (#720) (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Suppress bad-Unicode HTML checker warnings (#179) (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Define Web IDL Modules (#675) (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Add async_iterable support (#720) (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Suppress bad-Unicode HTML checker warnings (#179) (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Review Draft Publication: June 2019 (#177) (Wednesday, 19 June)
• [whatwg/encoding] Consider not running the validator on all the encoding tables? (#178) (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Review Draft Publication: June 2019 (#910) (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Review Draft Publication: June 2019 (#767) (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Review Draft Publication: June 2019 (#910) (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Review Draft Publication: June 2019 (#767) (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow tree encapsulation and Element Timing (#816) (Saturday, 15 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Durable database writes (#99) (Friday, 14 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Support queries retrieving disjoint sets of keys (#19) (Friday, 14 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Durable database writes (#99) (Friday, 14 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Support queries retrieving disjoint sets of keys (#19) (Friday, 14 June)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow tree encapsulation and Element Timing (#816) (Friday, 14 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] A toast UI element (#385) (Friday, 14 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] A toggle switch control element (#384) (Thursday, 13 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] A toast UI element (#385) (Thursday, 13 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] A toggle switch control element (#384) (Wednesday, 12 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] A toggle switch control element (#384) (Wednesday, 12 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] A toggle switch control element (#384) (Wednesday, 12 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Top-level await integration for ServiceWorkers running modules (#1407) (Tuesday, 11 June)
• Re: [whatwg/storage] Add UsageDetails dictionary (#69) (Monday, 10 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Top-level await integration for ServiceWorkers running modules (#1407) (Monday, 10 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Mark DOMException as serializable (#732) (Monday, 10 June)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow tree encapsulation and Element Timing (#816) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: [whatwg/storage] Add UsageDetails dictionary (#69) (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Don't store is value when it won't be useful (#661) (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: [whatwg/storage] Add UsageDetails dictionary (#69) (Saturday, 1 June)

Dominic Farolino

• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Add a speculative flag to `Request` as well as related processing (#881) (Friday, 21 June)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Add a speculative flag to `Request` as well as related processing (#881) (Friday, 21 June)

Doug Turner

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Web Bluetooth Scanning (#333) (Tuesday, 11 June)

ehanley324

• [w3c/webcomponents] Resolve what elements of a page we look at for LayoutStability (#819) (Monday, 3 June)

Eric Lawrence

• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Limit the length of the Referer header (#903) (Tuesday, 4 June)

Federico Zivolo

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] A toast UI element (#385) (Friday, 14 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] A toast UI element (#385) (Friday, 14 June)

fernandocarvalhomovin

• Re: [w3c/permissions] Media autoplay permission (#150) (Monday, 17 June)

frlinw

• Re: [w3c/manifest] More restrictive standalone mode (#770) (Sunday, 30 June)
• [w3c/manifest] More restrictive standalone mode (#770) (Sunday, 30 June)

Gary Green

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] A toast UI element (#385) (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] A toast UI element (#385) (Friday, 14 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] A toast UI element (#385) (Friday, 14 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] A toast UI element (#385) (Friday, 14 June)

Hamid

• [whatwg/fetch] CORS safelisting trace context header (#911) (Thursday, 20 June)

hober

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Form Participation API (#305) (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Form Participation API (#305) (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Backdrop Filter (#353) (Thursday, 6 June)

Jack Steinberg

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] A toast UI element (#385) (Wednesday, 12 June)
• [w3ctag/design-reviews] A toast UI element (#385) (Wednesday, 12 June)

Jacob Pratt

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: a DocumentFragment whose nodes do not get removed once inserted (#736) (Saturday, 29 June)

Jake Archibald

• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Add an option to include frozen documents. (#1442) (Friday, 28 June)
• [w3c/ServiceWorker] How to create registration objects (#1445) (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Add an option to include frozen documents. (#1442) (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Add an option to include frozen documents. (#1442) (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Add an option to include frozen documents. (#1442) (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Handle asynchronous modules (top-level await). (#1444) (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Handle asynchronous modules (top-level await). (#1444) (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Experimenting with abortable algorithms (#1443) (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Handle asynchronous modules (top-level await). (#1444) (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Add an option to include frozen documents. (#1442) (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Create a Kill Service Workers algorithm (#1440) (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] More informative error types (#526) (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Add an option to include frozen documents. (#1442) (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Add an option to include frozen documents. (#1442) (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Handle asynchronous modules (top-level await). (#1444) (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Experimenting with abortable algorithms (#1443) (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Experimenting with abortable algorithms (#1443) (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Experimenting with abortable algorithms (#1443) (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Handle asynchronous modules (top-level await). (#1444) (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Handle asynchronous modules (top-level await). (#1444) (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Experimenting with abortable algorithms (#1443) (Tuesday, 25 June)
• [w3c/ServiceWorker] Experimenting with abortable algorithms (#1443) (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Create a Kill Service Workers algorithm (#1440) (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] How can I pass or post params to sevirce worker on register or install? (#1441) (Monday, 24 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] How can I pass or post params to sevirce worker on register or install? (#1441) (Monday, 24 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Export the Clear Registration Algorithm (#1438) (Friday, 21 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Find a way for service workers to get their current state (#1077) (Friday, 21 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Adding self.serviceWorker to service workers. (#1426) (Friday, 21 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Find a way for service workers to get their current state (#1077) (Friday, 21 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Export the Clear Registration Algorithm (#1438) (Friday, 21 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] A way to immediately unregister a service worker (#614) (Friday, 21 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Adding self.serviceWorker to service workers. (#1426) (Friday, 21 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] @alimsaeed2020 (#1439) (Friday, 21 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Find a way for service workers to get their current state (#1077) (Thursday, 20 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Top-level await integration for ServiceWorkers running modules (#1407) (Tuesday, 18 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Top-level await integration for ServiceWorkers running modules (#1407) (Tuesday, 18 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Top-level await integration for ServiceWorkers running modules (#1407) (Tuesday, 18 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Top-level await integration for ServiceWorkers running modules (#1407) (Monday, 17 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Should the worker be removed from the registration *before* its state is set to "redundant"? (#1273) (Friday, 14 June)
• [w3c/ServiceWorker] Update order (#1436) (Friday, 14 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Adding self.serviceWorker to service workers. (#1426) (Thursday, 13 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Export "clear registration" (#1410) (Thursday, 13 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Should update() always reject if there is an installing worker? (#1429) (Thursday, 13 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Adding self.serviceWorker to service workers. (#1426) (Thursday, 13 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Removing failed registrations (#1434) (Thursday, 13 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Should we restore the registration record removing step in Clear Registration? (#1433) (Thursday, 13 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] [wip] First pass at adding internal slots (#495) (Thursday, 13 June)
• [w3c/ServiceWorker] Removing failed registrations (#1434) (Thursday, 13 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] A way to immediately unregister a service worker (#614) (Thursday, 13 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] [wip] First pass at adding internal slots (#495) (Thursday, 13 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Find a way for service workers to get their current state (#1077) (Wednesday, 12 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Find a way for service workers to get their current state (#1077) (Wednesday, 12 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Adding self.serviceWorker to service workers. (#1426) (Wednesday, 12 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Improving service worker state (#1432) (Wednesday, 12 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Improving service worker state (#1432) (Wednesday, 12 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Improving service worker state (#1432) (Tuesday, 11 June)
• [w3c/ServiceWorker] Improving service worker state (#1432) (Tuesday, 11 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Adding self.serviceWorker to service workers. (#1426) (Tuesday, 11 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Broken links to v1 (#1431) (Tuesday, 11 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Broken links to v1 (#1431) (Tuesday, 11 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Top-level await integration for ServiceWorkers running modules (#1407) (Tuesday, 11 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Top-level await integration for ServiceWorkers running modules (#1407) (Tuesday, 11 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Central algorithm for updating service worker state and registrations (#1416) (Monday, 10 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Bikeshed improvements to *force bypass cache for import scripts flag* (#1430) (Monday, 10 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Broken links to v1 (#1431) (Monday, 10 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] One ServiceWorker object per service worker per realm (#1428) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Check for Run Service Worker failure and disallow starting redundant workers. (#1419) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Check for Run Service Worker failure and disallow starting redundant workers. (#1419) (Friday, 7 June)
• [w3c/ServiceWorker] One ServiceWorker object per service worker per realm (#1428) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Adding self.serviceWorker to service workers. (#1426) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Adding self.serviceWorker to service workers. (#1426) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Adding self.serviceWorker to service workers. (#1426) (Friday, 7 June)
• [w3c/ServiceWorker] Adding self.serviceWorker to service workers. (#1426) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Fixing a couple of bikeshed errors (#1425) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Fixing a couple of bikeshed errors (#1425) (Friday, 7 June)
• [w3c/ServiceWorker] Fixing a couple of bikeshed errors (#1425) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Check for Run Service Worker failure and disallow starting redundant workers. (#1419) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Check for Run Service Worker failure and disallow starting redundant workers. (#1419) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Check for Run Service Worker failure and disallow starting redundant workers. (#1419) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Check for Run Service Worker failure and disallow starting redundant workers. (#1419) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Check for Run Service Worker failure and disallow starting redundant workers. (#1419) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Check for Run Service Worker failure and disallow starting redundant workers. (#1419) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Check for Run Service Worker failure and disallow starting redundant workers. (#1419) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Check for Run Service Worker failure and disallow starting redundant workers. (#1419) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] oncurrentchange in test (#1421) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] oncurrentchange in test (#1421) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Fixing max scope to include trailing slash. (#1424) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] maxScopeString definition is missing the trailing '/' (#1423) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Fixing max scope to include trailing slash. (#1424) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Fixing max scope to include trailing slash. (#1424) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Fixing max scope to include trailing slash. (#1424) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Export "clear registration" (#1410) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Fixing max scope to include trailing slash. (#1424) (Friday, 7 June)
• [w3c/ServiceWorker] Fixing max scope to include trailing slash. (#1424) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Add trailing '/' to example of max scope (#1422) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Add trailing '/' to example of max scope (#1422) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Add trailing '/' to example of max scope (#1422) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] maxScopeString definition is missing the trailing '/' (#1423) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Check for Run Service Worker failure and disallow starting redundant workers. (#1419) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] oncurrentchange in test (#1421) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Central algorithm for updating service worker state and registrations (#1416) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Object equality of service worker registrations (#1420) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Object equality of service worker registrations (#1420) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Central algorithm for updating service worker state and registrations (#1416) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] "Unregister" operation may be interrupted by `ServiceWorker#postMessage` (#1146) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Central algorithm for updating service worker state and registrations (#1416) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Central algorithm for updating service worker state and registrations (#1416) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Central algorithm for updating service worker state and registrations (#1416) (Thursday, 6 June)
• [w3c/ServiceWorker] oncurrentchange in test (#1421) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Central algorithm for updating service worker state and registrations (#1416) (Thursday, 6 June)
• [w3c/ServiceWorker] Object equality of service worker registrations (#1420) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Fix early return value from Handle Fetch. (#1418) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Fix early return value from Handle Fetch. (#1418) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Kill resurrection (#1415) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Kill resurrection (#1415) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] resurrected service workers don't fire an activate event which may break expectations (#1204) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Kill resurrection (#1415) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Central algorithm for updating service worker state and registrations (#1416) (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Central algorithm for updating service worker state and registrations (#1416) (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Central algorithm for updating service worker state and registrations (#1416) (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Unify the event skipping algorithm when there is no event handler. (#1417) (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Central algorithm for updating service worker state and registrations (#1416) (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Central algorithm for updating service worker state and registrations (#1416) (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Central algorithm for updating service worker state and registrations (#1416) (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Central algorithm for updating service worker state and registrations (#1416) (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Central algorithm for updating service worker state and registrations (#1416) (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Central algorithm for updating service worker state and registrations (#1416) (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Central algorithm for updating service worker state and registrations (#1416) (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Central algorithm for updating service worker state and registrations (#1416) (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Central algorithm for updating service worker state and registrations (#1416) (Tuesday, 4 June)
• [w3c/ServiceWorker] Central algorithm for updating service worker state and registrations (#1416) (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Should the worker be removed from the registration *before* its state is set to "redundant"? (#1273) (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: [whatwg/storage] Allow 'session' bucket (#71) (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Should a SW client.id persists across Discards/Reloads of the same page? (#1263) (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Should a SW client.id persists across Discards/Reloads of the same page? (#1263) (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Kill resurrection (#1415) (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Kill resurrection (#1415) (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Kill resurrection (#1415) (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Kill resurrection (#1415) (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Kill resurrection (#1415) (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Kill resurrection (#1415) (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Kill resurrection (#1415) (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] resurrected service workers don't fire an activate event which may break expectations (#1204) (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Kill resurrection (#1415) (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Kill resurrection (#1415) (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Kill resurrection (#1415) (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Kill resurrection (#1415) (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Kill resurrection (#1415) (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Kill resurrection (#1415) (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Kill resurrection (#1415) (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Kill resurrection (#1415) (Monday, 3 June)
• [w3c/ServiceWorker] Kill resurrection (#1415) (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Improve "update via cache" and "worker type" in register algorithms. (#1411) (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Fixing link to "scope" and copying changes to v1. (#1413) (Monday, 3 June)
• [w3c/ServiceWorker] Fixing link to "scope" and copying changes to v1. (#1413) (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Improve "update via cache" and "worker type" in register algorithms. (#1411) (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Fixing deploy (#1412) (Monday, 3 June)
• [w3c/ServiceWorker] Fixing deploy (#1412) (Monday, 3 June)

James Browning

• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Top-level await integration for ServiceWorkers running modules (#1407) (Monday, 17 June)

Jarryd

• Re: [whatwg/storage] Add UsageDetails dictionary (#69) (Tuesday, 4 June)
• [whatwg/storage] Add a Security and Privacy section. (#72) (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: [whatwg/storage] Add UsageDetails dictionary (#69) (Monday, 3 June)

Jay Harris

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] File Handling (#371) (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Badging API (#387) (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] File Handling (#371) (Thursday, 20 June)
• [w3ctag/design-reviews] Badging API (#387) (Tuesday, 18 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] File Handling (#371) (Thursday, 6 June)

Jeffrey Posnick

• [whatwg/fetch] Warning: header & stale-while-revalidate (#913) (Monday, 24 June)
• [w3c/ServiceWorker] Add trailing '/' to example of max scope (#1422) (Thursday, 6 June)

Jesse Hausler

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] In Shadow DOM v1, tabIndex=-1 makes all elements inside the shadow tree to be no tab-focusable (#774) (Monday, 24 June)

Jihye Hong

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Spatial Navigation (#287) (Wednesday, 26 June)

Joel Einbinder

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] In Shadow DOM v1, tabIndex=-1 makes all elements inside the shadow tree to be no tab-focusable (#774) (Tuesday, 25 June)

Johan Sundström

• Re: [w3c/selection-api] Define behavior for user action of "selecting all". (#105) (Tuesday, 11 June)
• Re: [w3c/selection-api] Add beforeselectionchange event (#56) (Tuesday, 11 June)

Johannes Wilm

• Re: [w3c/editing] `document.execCommand()` should do nothing when the document is invisible (#193) (Sunday, 30 June)
• Re: [w3c/editing] `document.execCommand()` should do nothing when the document is invisible (#193) (Sunday, 30 June)

John Reeves

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Custom 'void' or self-closing elements (HTML parser changes) (#624) (Friday, 14 June)

Jonas Sicking

• [w3c/IndexedDB] Backward-compatible schema changes are very hard (#282) (Tuesday, 18 June)

Jose Santiago Silva Ramirez

• Re: [whatwg/url] Goal: Getting a fixed document release (#222) (Friday, 21 June)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Transparency reports (#909) (Monday, 10 June)
• [whatwg/fetch] Transparency reports (#909) (Monday, 10 June)

Josh Karlin

• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Add a speculative flag to `Request` as well as related processing (#881) (Monday, 24 June)

Joshua Bell

• Re: [heycam/webidl] Make [SameObject] beneficial (#212) (Monday, 24 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Specify keyPath sequence caching behavior on IDBObjectStore (#283) (Monday, 24 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Specify keyPath sequence caching behavior on IDBObjectStore (#283) (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Should it be clarified that `IDBDatabase.close()` is idempotent? (#222) (Saturday, 15 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Editorial: Add note about close() being idempotent. (#281) (Saturday, 15 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Editorial: Add note about close() being idempotent. (#281) (Saturday, 15 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Editorial: Add note about close() being idempotent. (#281) (Saturday, 15 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] JSON schema specification (#64) (Friday, 14 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] boolean should be a valid key (#76) (Friday, 14 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Async LocalStorage (transactionless key-value API over IDB) (#91) (Friday, 14 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Async LocalStorage (transactionless key-value API over IDB) (#91) (Friday, 14 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Security and Web Worker access for IndexedDB (#141) (Friday, 14 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Security and Web Worker access for IndexedDB (#141) (Friday, 14 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Define flush-to-disk guarantees and control (#50) (Friday, 14 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Durable database writes (#99) (Friday, 14 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Durable database writes (#99) (Friday, 14 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Editorial: Add note about close() being idempotent. (#281) (Friday, 14 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Editorial: Add note about close() being idempotent. (#281) (Friday, 14 June)
• [w3c/IndexedDB] Editorial: Add note about close() being idempotent. (#281) (Friday, 14 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Should it be clarified that `IDBDatabase.close()` is idempotent? (#222) (Friday, 14 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Transaction storm in idb-transaction-commit explainer sample (#245) (Friday, 14 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Transaction storm in idb-transaction-commit explainer sample (#245) (Friday, 14 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Durable database writes (#99) (Friday, 14 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Support queries retrieving disjoint sets of keys (#19) (Friday, 14 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Support queries retrieving disjoint sets of keys (#19) (Friday, 14 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Durable database writes (#99) (Friday, 14 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Support queries retrieving disjoint sets of keys (#19) (Friday, 14 June)
• [w3c/IndexedDB] Speculative getAllEntries() spec (#280) (Thursday, 13 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Editorial: Replace flag set/unset with true/false. (#279) (Thursday, 13 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Editorial: Replace flag set/unset with true/false. (#279) (Wednesday, 12 June)
• [w3c/IndexedDB] Editorial: Replace flag set/unset with true/false. (#279) (Wednesday, 12 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Use Infra terms to simplify text. (#275) (Wednesday, 12 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Use Infra terms to simplify text. (#275) (Wednesday, 12 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Use Infra terms to simplify text. (#275) (Wednesday, 12 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Use Infra terms to simplify text. (#275) (Wednesday, 12 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Editorial: Simplify wording around async request invocation (#278) (Wednesday, 12 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Editorial: Simplify wording around async request invocation (#278) (Wednesday, 12 June)
• [w3c/IndexedDB] Editorial: Simplify wording around async request invocation (#278) (Wednesday, 12 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Use Infra terms to simplify text. (#275) (Wednesday, 12 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Editorial: Simplify 'steps to' (#277) (Wednesday, 12 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Use Infra terms to simplify text. (#275) (Wednesday, 12 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Editorial: Simplify 'steps to' (#277) (Wednesday, 12 June)
• [w3c/IndexedDB] Editorial: Simplify 'steps to' (#277) (Wednesday, 12 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Use Infra terms to simplify text. (#275) (Wednesday, 12 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Use Infra terms to simplify text. (#275) (Wednesday, 12 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] getAll() will crash sometimes in Electron (#276) (Wednesday, 12 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] getAll() will crash sometimes in Electron (#276) (Wednesday, 12 June)
• [w3c/IndexedDB] Use Infra terms to simplify text. (#275) (Tuesday, 11 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Crash for getAll() api in Electron (#274) (Tuesday, 11 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Crash for getAll() api in Electron (#274) (Tuesday, 11 June)
• Re: [whatwg/storage] Add UsageDetails dictionary (#69) (Monday, 10 June)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Implementation status for DOMError? (#766) (Monday, 10 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] `getAll()` with both key and value (or index key and primary key) (#206) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] `getAll()` with both key and value (or index key and primary key) (#206) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Editorial: Correct linking for IDBKeyRange lowerBound/upperBound (#272) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Definitions for IDBKeyRange lowerBound and upperBound aren't linked correctly. (#271) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Editorial: Correct linking for IDBKeyRange lowerBound/upperBound (#272) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Editorial: Fix _includes link, add note. (#273) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] IDBKeyRange.includes or IDBKeyRange._includes? (#270) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Editorial: Correct linking for IDBKeyRange lowerBound/upperBound (#272) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Editorial: Correct linking for IDBKeyRange lowerBound/upperBound (#272) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Editorial: Correct linking for IDBKeyRange lowerBound/upperBound (#272) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Editorial: Fix _includes link, add note. (#273) (Friday, 7 June)
• [w3c/IndexedDB] Editorial: Fix _includes link, add note. (#273) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] IDBKeyRange.includes or IDBKeyRange._includes? (#270) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Documentation about IDL keyword escaping says trailing, not leading (#733) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Documentation about IDL keyword escaping says trailing, not leading (#733) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] IDL/dfn of terms with underscores not autolinking as expected. (#734) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] IDL/dfn of terms with underscores not autolinking as expected. (#734) (Friday, 7 June)
• [heycam/webidl] IDL/dfn of terms with underscores not autolinking as expected. (#734) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] IDBKeyRange.includes or IDBKeyRange._includes? (#270) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] IDBKeyRange.includes or IDBKeyRange._includes? (#270) (Thursday, 6 June)
• [heycam/webidl] Documentation about IDL keyword escaping says trailing, not leading (#733) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Editorial: Correct linking for IDBKeyRange lowerBound/upperBound (#272) (Thursday, 6 June)
• [w3c/IndexedDB] Editorial: Correct linking for IDBKeyRange lowerBound/upperBound (#272) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Extract common steps of `IDBObjectStore`'s `put()` and`add()` (#261) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Extract common steps of `IDBObjectStore`'s `put()` and`add()` (#261) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Factor common steps out of add()/put(). (#269) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Factor common steps out of add()/put(). (#269) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Factor common steps out of add()/put(). (#269) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] IDBKeyRange.includes or IDBKeyRange._includes? (#270) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] IDBKeyRange.includes or IDBKeyRange._includes? (#270) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] lastModifiedDate on File is not a thing (#215) (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] lastModifiedDate on File is not a thing (#215) (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Extract common steps of `IDBObjectStore`'s `put()` and`add()` (#261) (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Factor common steps out of add()/put(). (#269) (Wednesday, 5 June)
• [w3c/IndexedDB] Factor common steps out of add()/put(). (#269) (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] `getAll()` with both key and value (or index key and primary key) (#206) (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] chore(index.bs): now part of webapps WG (#267) (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] chore(index.bs): now part of webapps WG (#267) (Monday, 3 June)

JP

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Using private fields and methods in template instantiation (#808) (Sunday, 30 June)

Jungkee Song

• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] A way to immediately unregister a service worker (#614) (Friday, 14 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Use ASCII serialization for origins (#1142) (Thursday, 13 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Use ASCII serialization for origins (#1151) (Thursday, 13 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Use ASCII serialization for origins (#1151) (Thursday, 13 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Use ASCII serialization for origins (#1151) (Thursday, 13 June)
• [w3c/ServiceWorker] Should we restore the registration record removing step in Clear Registration? (#1433) (Thursday, 13 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] A way to immediately unregister a service worker (#614) (Thursday, 13 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Broken links to v1 (#1431) (Monday, 10 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Kill resurrection (#1415) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Kill resurrection (#1415) (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Kill resurrection (#1415) (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Kill resurrection (#1415) (Wednesday, 5 June)

Junior

• [whatwg/fetch] Remove brief to unhide the note in fetch-redirect (#914) (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Let Origin header honor referrer policy for non CORS request (#908) (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Let Origin header honor referrer policy for non CORS request (#908) (Thursday, 20 June)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Let Origin header honor referrer policy for non CORS request (#908) (Thursday, 20 June)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Let Origin header honor referrer policy for non CORS request (#908) (Monday, 17 June)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Let Origin header honor referrer policy for non CORS request (#908) (Monday, 17 June)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Let Origin header honor referrer policy for non CORS request (#908) (Monday, 3 June)

Justin Fagnani

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Expose and API for syncing attributes and properties (#823) (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Workers and non-JavaScript modules (#822) (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Workers and non-JavaScript modules (#822) (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add global reflecting attributes to ElementInternals? (#821) (Thursday, 27 June)
• [w3c/webcomponents] Add global reflecting attributes to ElementInternals? (#821) (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] How to define APIs only for custom element authors (#758) (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Lazy Custom Element Definitions (#782) (Wednesday, 26 June)

Kagami Sascha Rosylight

• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Specify keyPath sequence caching behavior on IDBObjectStore (#283) (Thursday, 20 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Specify keyPath sequence caching behavior on IDBObjectStore (#283) (Thursday, 20 June)
• [w3c/IndexedDB] Specify keyPath sequence caching behavior on IDBObjectStore (#283) (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Implementation status for DOMError? (#766) (Tuesday, 11 June)
• [whatwg/dom] Implementation status for DOMError? (#766) (Monday, 10 June)

kasnihuang

• [w3c/IndexedDB] Crash for getAll() api in Electron (#274) (Tuesday, 11 June)

Kenneth Rohde Christiansen

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Native File System API (#390) (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add shortcuts feature to the explainer and spec (#768) (Friday, 21 June)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add shortcuts feature to the explainer and spec (#768) (Friday, 21 June)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Add "wake-lock" permission type (#192) (Friday, 21 June)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Adding shortcuts to the explainer (#768) (Friday, 21 June)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Adding shortcuts to the explainer (#768) (Friday, 21 June)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Adding shortcuts to the explainer (#768) (Friday, 21 June)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Adding shortcuts to the explainer (#768) (Friday, 21 June)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Adding shortcuts to the explainer (#768) (Friday, 21 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] A toast UI element (#385) (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] JavaScript WeakRefs (#321) (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] JavaScript WeakRefs (#321) (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] A toast UI element (#385) (Friday, 14 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] A toast UI element (#385) (Thursday, 13 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] A toast UI element (#385) (Thursday, 13 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] A toggle switch control element (#384) (Thursday, 13 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Top-level await (#376) (Wednesday, 12 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Top-level await (#376) (Wednesday, 12 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Content Indexing (#379) (Wednesday, 12 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Content Indexing (#379) (Wednesday, 12 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Content Indexing (#379) (Wednesday, 12 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Content Indexing (#379) (Wednesday, 12 June)

L. David Baron

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] SMS Receiver API (#391) (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Web of Things (WoT) Architecture (#355) (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Web of Things (WoT) Architecture (#355) (Thursday, 20 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Web of Things (WoT) Thing Description (#357) (Thursday, 20 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Contact Picker API (#388) (Tuesday, 18 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] A toast UI element (#385) (Thursday, 13 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] A toggle switch control element (#384) (Wednesday, 12 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] A toggle switch control element (#384) (Wednesday, 12 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] A toggle switch control element (#384) (Wednesday, 12 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Web Authentication Feature Detection (#383) (Wednesday, 12 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Web Authentication Feature Detection (#383) (Friday, 7 June)

L. Preston Sego III

• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Encrypted storage (#191) (Sunday, 23 June)

Lars den Bakker

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow tree encapsulation and Element Timing (#816) (Friday, 14 June)

Lukasz Olejnik

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Pointerevent extension (#346) (Friday, 14 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Storage Quota Usage Details (#365) (Friday, 14 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] JS Self-Profiling API (#366) (Friday, 14 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Pointerevent extension (#346) (Wednesday, 12 June)

Luke Wagner

• Re: [whatwg/streams] Could a byte stream read directly into and out of a SAB (w/o transfer)? (#757) (Friday, 28 June)

Maciej Stachowiak

• Re: [w3c/uievents] Should an element remain focused and receive key events if it's display:none-ed? (#236) (Saturday, 29 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] A toast UI element (#385) (Thursday, 13 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] A toggle switch control element (#384) (Thursday, 13 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] A toggle switch control element (#384) (Thursday, 13 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] A toast UI element (#385) (Thursday, 13 June)

Majid Valipour

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] CSS Animation Worklet API (#349) (Wednesday, 19 June)

Manish Goregaokar

• Re: [heycam/webidl] Sort out when dictionaries and records should have default values (#76) (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Sort out when dictionaries and records should have default values (#76) (Thursday, 27 June)

Manu Sporny

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Verifiable Credentials Data Model 1.0 (#343) (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Verifiable Credentials Data Model 1.0 (#343) (Thursday, 27 June)

Marcos Cáceres

• Re: [w3c/screen-orientation] fix(.travis.yml): use https for URL (#180) (Thursday, 27 June)
• [w3c/screen-orientation] fix(.travis.yml): use https for URL (#180) (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: [w3c/screen-orientation] Page visibility transition can fire when false/true/false happens within a frame (#179) (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: [w3c/screen-orientation] Page visibility transition can fire when false/true/false happens within a frame (#179) (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Export "clear registration" (#1410) (Saturday, 15 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Export "clear registration" (#1410) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [w3c/uievents] Broken links to Web IDL spec (#172) (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: [w3c/uievents] Fix references to Web IDL (#176) (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: [w3c/uievents] Fix references to Web IDL (#176) (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: [w3c/uievents] Fix references to Web IDL (#176) (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: [w3c/uievents] Fix references to Web IDL (#176) (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: [w3c/FileAPI] Modernize Blob constructor a tiny bit (#125) (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: [w3c/FileAPI] Modernize Blob constructor a tiny bit (#125) (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: [w3c/FileAPI] Modernize Blob constructor a tiny bit (#125) (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Chore: Spec xref fixup (#45) (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: [w3c/selection-api] Editorial: collapsed is now exported by DOM spec (#109) (Wednesday, 5 June)
• [w3c/pointerlock] Chore: Spec xref fixup (#45) (Tuesday, 4 June)
• [w3c/selection-api] Editorial: collapse is now exported by DOM spec (#109) (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: [w3c/selection-api] chore: move meta charset (#108) (Tuesday, 4 June)
• [w3c/selection-api] chore: move meta charset (#108) (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: [w3c/selection-api] Add [Exposed] to all interfaces (#92) (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: [w3c/selection-api] chore: enable autopublish (#107) (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: [w3c/selection-api] chore: enable autopublish (#107) (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: [w3c/selection-api] chore: enable autopublish (#107) (Tuesday, 4 June)
• [whatwg/dom] Export concept of collapsed (#764) (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: [w3c/selection-api] chore: enable autopublish (#107) (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: [w3c/selection-api] chore: enable autopublish (#107) (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: [w3c/selection-api] chore: enable autopublish (#107) (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: [w3c/selection-api] chore: enable autopublish (#107) (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: [w3c/selection-api] chore: enable autopublish (#107) (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: [w3c/selection-api] chore: enable autopublish (#107) (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: [w3c/push-api] chore(.travis): set up validation (#307) (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: [w3c/push-api] chore(.travis): set up validation (#307) (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: [w3c/selection-api] chore: enable autopublish (#107) (Sunday, 2 June)
• Re: [w3c/selection-api] chore: enable autopublish (#107) (Sunday, 2 June)
• [w3c/selection-api] chore: enable autopublish (#107) (Sunday, 2 June)
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] chore: enable autopub (#44) (Sunday, 2 June)
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] chore: enable autopub (#44) (Sunday, 2 June)
• [w3c/pointerlock] chore: enable autopub (#44) (Sunday, 2 June)

Marijn Kruisselbrink

• [w3ctag/design-reviews] Native File System API (#390) (Monday, 24 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Editorial: Correct linking for IDBKeyRange lowerBound/upperBound (#272) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Editorial: Fix _includes link, add note. (#273) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] IDBKeyRange.includes or IDBKeyRange._includes? (#270) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Editorial: Correct linking for IDBKeyRange lowerBound/upperBound (#272) (Thursday, 6 June)
• [w3c/IndexedDB] Definitions for IDBKeyRange lowerBound and upperBound aren't linked correctly. (#271) (Thursday, 6 June)
• [w3c/IndexedDB] IDBKeyRange.includes or IDBKeyRange._includes? (#270) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] lastModifiedDate on File is not a thing (#215) (Wednesday, 5 June)

Mark Kennedy

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] A toast UI element (#385) (Wednesday, 12 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Require markdown for explainers, and some more (#381) (Saturday, 8 June)

Mark Nottingham

• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Warning: header & stale-while-revalidate (#913) (Monday, 24 June)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Warning: header & stale-while-revalidate (#913) (Monday, 24 June)

Masayuki Nakano

• Re: [w3c/editing] `document.execCommand()` should do nothing when the document is invisible (#193) (Thursday, 13 June)
• Re: [w3c/editing] `document.execCommand()` should do nothing when the document is invisible (#193) (Wednesday, 12 June)
• [w3c/editing] `document.execCommand()` should do nothing when the document is invisible (#193) (Wednesday, 12 June)

Mason Freed

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Backdrop Filter (#353) (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Backdrop Filter (#353) (Sunday, 9 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Backdrop Filter (#353) (Thursday, 6 June)

Matt Bierner

• [w3c/ServiceWorker] Registering service workers for unique origins? (#1437) (Wednesday, 19 June)

Matt Falkenhagen

• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Experimenting with abortable algorithms (#1443) (Tuesday, 25 June)
• [w3c/ServiceWorker] Add a WPT test for credentialed requests in register()/update (#1435) (Friday, 14 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] A way to immediately unregister a service worker (#614) (Friday, 14 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] A way to immediately unregister a service worker (#614) (Thursday, 13 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Removing failed registrations (#1434) (Thursday, 13 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Adding self.serviceWorker to service workers. (#1426) (Thursday, 13 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] A way to immediately unregister a service worker (#614) (Thursday, 13 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] A way to immediately unregister a service worker (#614) (Thursday, 13 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] A way to immediately unregister a service worker (#614) (Thursday, 13 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Improving service worker state (#1432) (Wednesday, 12 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Bikeshed improvements to *force bypass cache for import scripts flag* (#1430) (Tuesday, 11 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Bikeshed improvements to *force bypass cache for import scripts flag* (#1430) (Tuesday, 11 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Bikeshed improvements to *force bypass cache for import scripts flag* (#1430) (Tuesday, 11 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Bikeshed improvements to *force bypass cache for import scripts flag* (#1430) (Tuesday, 11 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] "Unregister" operation may be interrupted by `ServiceWorker#postMessage` (#1146) (Monday, 10 June)
• [w3c/ServiceWorker] Broken links to v1 (#1431) (Monday, 10 June)
• [w3c/ServiceWorker] Bikeshed improvements to *force bypass cache for import scripts flag* (#1430) (Monday, 10 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Should update() always reject if there is an installing worker? (#1429) (Monday, 10 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Should update() called on an installing worker reject (as currently does?) (#1155) (Monday, 10 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Should update() called on an installing worker reject (as currently does?) (#1155) (Monday, 10 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Should update() always reject if there is an installing worker? (#1429) (Monday, 10 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Should update() always reject if there is an installing worker? (#1429) (Monday, 10 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Should update() always reject if there is an installing worker? (#1429) (Monday, 10 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Should update() always reject if there is an installing worker? (#1429) (Monday, 10 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Missing task queuing (#1403) (Monday, 10 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Missing task queuing (#1403) (Monday, 10 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] "Unregister" operation may be interrupted by `ServiceWorker#postMessage` (#1146) (Monday, 10 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] "Unregister" operation may be interrupted by `ServiceWorker#postMessage` (#1146) (Monday, 10 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Check for Run Service Worker failure and disallow starting redundant workers. (#1419) (Monday, 10 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Check for Run Service Worker failure and disallow starting redundant workers. (#1419) (Monday, 10 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] ServiceWorker, ServiceWorkerRegistration should be moved out of "Client Context" section (#1427) (Monday, 10 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Check for Run Service Worker failure and disallow starting redundant workers. (#1419) (Monday, 10 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Check for Run Service Worker failure and disallow starting redundant workers. (#1419) (Monday, 10 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] ServiceWorker, ServiceWorkerRegistration should be moved out of "Client Context" section (#1427) (Monday, 10 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Check for Run Service Worker failure and disallow starting redundant workers. (#1419) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Check for Run Service Worker failure and disallow starting redundant workers. (#1419) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] One ServiceWorker object per service worker per realm (#1428) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Check for Run Service Worker failure and disallow starting redundant workers. (#1419) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Check for Run Service Worker failure and disallow starting redundant workers. (#1419) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Check for Run Service Worker failure and disallow starting redundant workers. (#1419) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Check for Run Service Worker failure and disallow starting redundant workers. (#1419) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Adding self.serviceWorker to service workers. (#1426) (Friday, 7 June)
• [w3c/ServiceWorker] ServiceWorker, ServiceWorkerRegistration should be moved out of "Client Context" section (#1427) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Fixing a couple of bikeshed errors (#1425) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Fixing max scope to include trailing slash. (#1424) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Fixing max scope to include trailing slash. (#1424) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Check for Run Service Worker failure and disallow starting redundant workers. (#1419) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Check for Run Service Worker failure and disallow starting redundant workers. (#1419) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Check for Run Service Worker failure and disallow starting redundant workers. (#1419) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Check for Run Service Worker failure and disallow starting redundant workers. (#1419) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Check for Run Service Worker failure and disallow starting redundant workers. (#1419) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Add trailing '/' to example of max scope (#1422) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Add trailing '/' to example of max scope (#1422) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Add trailing '/' to example of max scope (#1422) (Friday, 7 June)
• [w3c/ServiceWorker] maxScopeString definition is missing the trailing '/' (#1423) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] oncurrentchange in test (#1421) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] "Unregister" operation may be interrupted by `ServiceWorker#postMessage` (#1146) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Check for Run Service Worker failure and disallow starting redundant workers. (#1419) (Thursday, 6 June)
• [w3c/ServiceWorker] Check for Run Service Worker failure and disallow starting redundant workers. (#1419) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] "Unregister" operation may be interrupted by `ServiceWorker#postMessage` (#1146) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] What happens to the request body if the fetch isn't handled? (#1191) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Fix early return value from Handle Fetch. (#1418) (Thursday, 6 June)
• [w3c/ServiceWorker] Fix early return value from Handle Fetch. (#1418) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] is the browser required to start the ServiceWorker for postMessage() if there is no message event handler? (#1200) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] is the browser required to start the ServiceWorker for postMessage() if there is no message event handler? (#1200) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Unify the event skipping algorithm when there is no event handler. (#1417) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Unify the event skipping algorithm when there is no event handler. (#1417) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Unify the event skipping algorithm when there is no event handler. (#1417) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Unify the event skipping algorithm when there is no event handler. (#1417) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Kill resurrection (#1415) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] What happens to the request body if the fetch isn't handled? (#1191) (Wednesday, 5 June)
• [w3c/ServiceWorker] Unify the event skipping algorithm when there is no event handler. (#1417) (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Central algorithm for updating service worker state and registrations (#1416) (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Kill resurrection (#1415) (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Should add “script type” and “update via cache” when check two jobs are equivalent. (#1358) (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Should add “script type” and “update via cache” when check two jobs are equivalent. (#1358) (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Should add a “script type” check in the register algorithm. (#1359) (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Should add a “script type” check in the register algorithm. (#1359) (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Should register() trigger byte-for-byte checking when WorkerType is updated? (#1408) (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Should register() trigger byte-for-byte checking when WorkerType is updated? (#1408) (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Does changing updateViaCache mint a new ServiceWorkerRegistration or update them all? (#1189) (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Does changing updateViaCache mint a new ServiceWorkerRegistration or update them all? (#1189) (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Improve "update via cache" and "worker type" in register algorithms. (#1411) (Monday, 3 June)
• [w3c/ServiceWorker] Should register() trigger an update if only updateViaCache changes? (#1414) (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Improve "update via cache" and "worker type" in register algorithms. (#1411) (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Fixing link to "scope" and copying changes to v1. (#1413) (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Improve "update via cache" and "worker type" in register algorithms. (#1411) (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Improve "update via cache" and "worker type" in register algorithms. (#1411) (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Improve "update via cache" and "worker type" in register algorithms. (#1411) (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Improve "update via cache" and "worker type" in register algorithms. (#1411) (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Improve "update via cache" and "worker type" in register algorithms. (#1411) (Monday, 3 June)
• [w3c/ServiceWorker] Improve "update via cache" and "worker type" in register algorithms. (#1411) (Monday, 3 June)

mbrodesser

• Re: [w3c/selection-api] Make setBaseAndExtent and other setter methods on Selection work with shadow DOM (#99) (Friday, 28 June)
• [whatwg/dom] Add note that "A ShadowRoot node has no parent." (#770) (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: [w3c/selection-api] Define behavior for user action of selecting all text (#105) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [w3c/selection-api] Define behavior for user action of selecting all text (#105) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [w3c/selection-api] Define behavior for user action of selecting all text (#105) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: [w3c/selection-api] Define behavior for user action of selecting all text (#105) (Thursday, 6 June)

Michael Keck

• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] How can I pass or post params to sevirce worker on register or install? (#1441) (Monday, 24 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] How can I pass or post params to sevirce worker on register or install? (#1441) (Monday, 24 June)
• [w3c/ServiceWorker] How can I pass or post params to sevirce worker on register or install? (#1441) (Sunday, 23 June)

Michael Lagally

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Web of Things (WoT) Architecture (#355) (Friday, 28 June)

Michael[tm] Smith

• Re: [whatwg/fetch] CORS safelisting trace context header (#911) (Thursday, 20 June)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Suppress bad-Unicode HTML checker warnings (#179) (Wednesday, 19 June)
• [whatwg/encoding] Suppress bad-Unicode HTML checker warnings (#179) (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Review Draft Publication: June 2019 (#177) (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Consider not running the validator on all the encoding tables? (#178) (Wednesday, 19 June)

Mike West

• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Limit the length of the Referer header (#903) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Limit the length of the Referer header (#903) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Limit the length of the Referer header (#903) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Limit the length of the Referer header (#903) (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Limit the length of the Referer header (#903) (Tuesday, 4 June)

Ms2ger

• Re: [heycam/webidl] Editorial: Better explanation of the Global extended attribute. (#749) (Friday, 28 June)
• [heycam/webidl] Editorial: Better explanation of the Global extended attribute. (#749) (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Explicitly include annotated types in the various type categories. (#747) (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Explicitly include annotated types in the various type categories. (#747) (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Add async_iterable support (#720) (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Disallow Promise types in unions at the syntax level. (#746) (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Disallow Promise types in unions at the syntax level. (#746) (Friday, 28 June)
• [heycam/webidl] Explicitly include annotated types in the various type categories. (#747) (Thursday, 27 June)
• [heycam/webidl] Disallow Promise types in unions at the syntax level. (#746) (Thursday, 27 June)
• [heycam/webidl] Disallow combining Global with Constructor/NamedConstructor. (#745) (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Handle asynchronous modules (top-level await). (#1444) (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Add async_iterable support (#720) (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Add async_iterable support (#720) (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Add async_iterable support (#720) (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Add async_iterable support (#720) (Wednesday, 26 June)
• [heycam/webidl] Use IDL this for the synthetic forEach method. (#742) (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Rename Module.Instantiate to Module.Link (#741) (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Handle asynchronous modules (top-level await). (#1444) (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Handle asynchronous modules (top-level await). (#1444) (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Handle asynchronous modules (top-level await). (#1444) (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Add async_iterable support (#720) (Tuesday, 25 June)
• [heycam/webidl] Rename Module.Instantiate to Module.Link (#741) (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Handle asynchronous modules (top-level await). (#1444) (Tuesday, 25 June)
• [w3c/ServiceWorker] Handle asynchronous modules (top-level await). (#1444) (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] NonAnyType vs SingleType as home of PromiseType ε alternative (#740) (Monday, 24 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Introduce an UnenumerableOperations extended attribute (#719) (Monday, 17 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Introduce an UnenumerableOperations extended attribute (#719) (Monday, 17 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Reduce the restrictions on members whose names match auto-generated properties (#726) (Monday, 17 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Meta: use "good first issue" label (#736) (Friday, 14 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Meta: use "good first issue" label (#736) (Friday, 14 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] What's the defference in "number of nullable member type" and 'includes a nullable type"? (#735) (Friday, 7 June)

mulham99

• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Editorial: change remaining flags to booleans (#176) (Tuesday, 11 June)

Navid Zolghadr

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Pointerevent extension (#346) (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Pointerevent extension (#346) (Monday, 24 June)
• [w3c/uievents] Change click/auxclick/contextment/dblclick event types to PointerEvent? (#235) (Monday, 24 June)

npm1

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow tree encapsulation and Element Timing (#816) (Monday, 10 June)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow tree encapsulation and Element Timing (#816) (Monday, 10 June)

Omid Hekayati

• [w3c/manifest] Introduce main.html instead of manifest.webmanifest (#769) (Saturday, 29 June)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Why does this spec replicate HTML features? (#97) (Tuesday, 25 June)

Owen Edwards

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] A toast UI element (#385) (Monday, 17 June)

Patrick H. Lauke

• Re: [w3c/uievents] Change click/auxclick/contextment/dblclick event types to PointerEvent? (#235) (Monday, 24 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Pointerevent extension (#346) (Wednesday, 12 June)

Paul Frazee

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Custom 'void' or self-closing elements (HTML parser changes) (#624) (Friday, 14 June)

Paul Vollmer

• Re: [whatwg/url] Added URLs example.com/demo/ column to table (#441) (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Added URLs example.com/demo/ column to table (#441) (Wednesday, 5 June)
• [whatwg/url] Added URLs example.com/demo/ column to table (#441) (Tuesday, 4 June)

peria

• Re: [heycam/webidl] What's the defference in "number of nullable member type" and 'includes a nullable type"? (#735) (Friday, 7 June)
• [heycam/webidl] What's the defference in "number of nullable member type" and 'includes a nullable type"? (#735) (Friday, 7 June)

Peter Linss

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Contact Picker API (#388) (Monday, 24 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Contact Picker API (#388) (Monday, 24 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Contact API (#337) (Monday, 24 June)

Peter van Hardenberg

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Custom 'void' or self-closing elements (HTML parser changes) (#624) (Friday, 14 June)

Philip Jägenstedt

• Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] How :fullscreen CSS pseudo class works in shadow dom? (#149) (Wednesday, 5 June)

Philip Renich

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] A toast UI element (#385) (Thursday, 13 June)

Preet

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Updating Element Registration. (#820) (Tuesday, 25 June)
• [w3c/webcomponents] Updating Element Registration. (#820) (Saturday, 22 June)

Rakina Zata Amni

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Add delegatesFocus init to attachShadow and flag to ShadowRoot (#768) (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Add delegatesFocus init to attachShadow and flag to ShadowRoot (#768) (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Add delegatesFocus init to attachShadow and flag to ShadowRoot (#768) (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Add delegatesFocus init to attachShadow and flag to ShadowRoot (#768) (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Add delegatesFocus init to attachShadow and flag to ShadowRoot (#768) (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Add delegatesFocus init to attachShadow and flag to ShadowRoot (#768) (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Add delegatesFocus init to attachShadow and flag to ShadowRoot (#768) (Tuesday, 25 June)
• [whatwg/dom] Add delegatesFocus init to attachShadow and flag to ShadowRoot (#768) (Tuesday, 25 June)

Raphael Kubo da Costa

• Re: [w3c/permissions] Add "wake-lock" permission type (#192) (Friday, 14 June)

rayankans

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Contact API (#337) (Monday, 24 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Contact Picker API (#388) (Tuesday, 18 June)
• [w3ctag/design-reviews] Contact Picker API (#388) (Tuesday, 18 June)

Rick Byers

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] `SameSite=Lax` by default. (#373) (Monday, 10 June)

Rob Wormald

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Lazy Custom Element Definitions (#782) (Tuesday, 25 June)

Robert Linder

• Re: [w3c/manifest] Support for deep integrations, e.g. OpenSearch (#421) (Thursday, 27 June)

Ryosuke Niwa

• Re: [w3c/uievents] Should an element remain focused and receive key events if it's display:none-ed? (#236) (Sunday, 30 June)
• Re: [w3c/uievents] Should an element remain focused and receive key events if it's display:none-ed? (#236) (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add global reflecting attributes to ElementInternals? (#821) (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Updating Element Registration. (#820) (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] In Shadow DOM v1, tabIndex=-1 makes all elements inside the shadow tree to be no tab-focusable (#774) (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Add delegatesFocus init to attachShadow and flag to ShadowRoot (#768) (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow tree encapsulation and Element Timing (#816) (Saturday, 15 June)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Custom 'void' or self-closing elements (HTML parser changes) (#624) (Friday, 14 June)
• Re: [w3c/editing] `document.execCommand()` should do nothing when the document is invisible (#193) (Wednesday, 12 June)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow tree encapsulation and Element Timing (#816) (Monday, 10 June)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow tree encapsulation and Element Timing (#816) (Monday, 10 June)
• Re: [w3c/selection-api] Define behavior for user action of "selecting all". (#105) (Saturday, 8 June)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: ParentNode.replaceAll() / ParentNode.replaceChildren() (#478) (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: [w3c/selection-api] Define behavior for user action of selecting all text (#105) (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: [w3c/selection-api] Editorial: collapsed is now exported by DOM spec (#109) (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: [w3c/selection-api] Editorial: collapsed is now exported by DOM spec (#109) (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: [w3c/selection-api] chore: move meta charset (#108) (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: [w3c/selection-api] chore: move meta charset (#108) (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: [w3c/selection-api] chore: move meta charset (#108) (Tuesday, 4 June)

sam goto

• [w3ctag/design-reviews] SMS Receiver API (#391) (Thursday, 27 June)

Sean Larkin

• Re: [whatwg/xhr] Allow FormData constructor to accept array or object too (#202) (Wednesday, 12 June)

Shiino Yuki

• Re: [heycam/webidl] Add async_iterable support (#720) (Friday, 28 June)

Simon Pieters

• Re: [heycam/webidl] Is it true that dictionaries can't have a default value specified? (#585) (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] A toggle switch control element (#384) (Thursday, 13 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] A toast UI element (#385) (Thursday, 13 June)

slaneyrw

• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Header to opt out of opaque redirect (#601) (Monday, 17 June)

smaug----

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow tree encapsulation and Element Timing (#816) (Tuesday, 4 June)

Staphany Park

• Re: [whatwg/storage] Multiple boxes (#2) (Wednesday, 19 June)

Steven Penny

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] A toggle switch control element (#384) (Thursday, 13 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] A toast UI element (#385) (Thursday, 13 June)

stone

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Verifiable Credentials Data Model 1.0 (#343) (Thursday, 27 June)

Sunny

• [w3c/IndexedDB] getAll() will crash sometimes in Electron (#276) (Wednesday, 12 June)

Tab Atkins Jr.

• Re: [heycam/webidl] Editorial: Better explanation of the Global extended attribute. (#749) (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Add an option to include frozen documents. (#1442) (Thursday, 27 June)
• [heycam/webidl] Add an example of subclassing + [Global] (#748) (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] [wip] First pass at adding internal slots (#495) (Thursday, 13 June)

Takashi Toyoshima

• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Safelist request headers starting with `Sec-` (#880) (Wednesday, 12 June)

TAMURA, Kent

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] How to define APIs only for custom element authors (#758) (Friday, 28 June)
• [w3ctag/design-reviews] A toggle switch control element (#384) (Monday, 10 June)

Tanawat Prawanta

• [whatwg/dom] Pouri88 (#765) (Friday, 7 June)

Thomas Steiner

• Re: [w3c/manifest] Is prefer_related_applications too simplistic? (#365) (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add a `color_scheme` member to `ImageResource` (#758) (Tuesday, 4 June)

Timothy Gu

• Re: [heycam/webidl] Looking for some clarity on Promise<void> (#737) (Sunday, 23 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Mark DOMException as serializable (#732) (Monday, 10 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Mark DOMException as serializable (#732) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] IDL/dfn of terms with underscores not autolinking as expected. (#734) (Friday, 7 June)

Todd Reifsteck

• Re: [w3c/screen-orientation] Page visibility transition can fire when false/true/false happens within a frame (#179) (Thursday, 27 June)
• [w3c/screen-orientation] Page visibility transition can fire when false/true/false happens within a frame (#179) (Wednesday, 26 June)

Ulan Degenbaev

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] JavaScript Memory API (#386) (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] JavaScript Memory API (#386) (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] JavaScript Memory API (#386) (Wednesday, 26 June)
• [w3ctag/design-reviews] JavaScript Memory API (#386) (Wednesday, 12 June)

VeXell

• Re: [w3c/uievents] Expose 'direction-inversion' in wheel events (#57) (Thursday, 13 June)

Victor Costan

• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Define flush-to-disk guarantees and control (#50) (Tuesday, 18 June)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] boolean should be a valid key (#76) (Monday, 17 June)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Storage Quota Usage Details (#365) (Tuesday, 11 June)

Victor Vasiliev

• [whatwg/streams] Add support for bulk write operation (#1003) (Friday, 28 June)
• [w3ctag/design-reviews] WebTransport (#389) (Friday, 21 June)

Vivien Lacourba

• Re: [w3c/selection-api] Fix recipient's email (#110) (Tuesday, 25 June)

Wenson Hsieh

• Re: [w3c/editing] `document.execCommand()` should do nothing when the document is invisible (#193) (Sunday, 30 June)
• Re: [w3c/editing] `document.execCommand()` should do nothing when the document is invisible (#193) (Wednesday, 12 June)

Xiaoqian Wu

• Re: [w3c/manifest] Adding shortcuts to the explainer (#768) (Sunday, 16 June)
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] add encrypted token (#46) (Thursday, 6 June)
• [w3c/pointerlock] add encrypted token (#46) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Chore: Spec xref fixup (#45) (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Chore: Spec xref fixup (#45) (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: [w3c/selection-api] chore: enable autopublish (#107) (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: [w3c/selection-api] chore: enable autopublish (#107) (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: [w3c/selection-api] chore: enable autopublish (#107) (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] chore: enable autopub (#44) (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] chore: enable autopub (#44) (Monday, 3 June)

Yannic

• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Should update() always reject if there is an installing worker? (#1429) (Thursday, 13 June)
• [w3c/ServiceWorker] Should update() always reject if there is an installing worker? (#1429) (Sunday, 9 June)

Yoav Weiss

• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Request's associated element (#912) (Monday, 24 June)
• [whatwg/fetch] Request's associated element (#912) (Monday, 24 June)

youennf

• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Find a way for service workers to get their current state (#1077) (Friday, 21 June)

Yutaka Hirano

• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Let Origin header honor referrer policy for non CORS request (#908) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Mark DOMException as serializable (#732) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Mark DOMException as serializable (#732) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Mark DOMException as serializable (#732) (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Mark DOMException as serializable (#732) (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Mark DOMException as serializable (#732) (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Mark DOMException as serializable (#732) (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Mark DOMException as serializable (#732) (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Mark DOMException as serializable (#732) (Wednesday, 5 June)

Last message date: Sunday, 30 June 2019 23:37:19 UTC