[heycam/webidl] Should iterator prototype object next functions be enumerable? (#739)

https://heycam.github.io/webidl/#es-iterator-prototype-object (and the corresponding part of #720) says they are. Their ECMAScript counterparts are not.

Unlike #738, here I lean toward making them non-enumerable, as these objects are in some sense "entirely ECMAScript-like". The method in question doesn't share a location with enumerable methods corresponding to Web IDL operations.

But, I don't care that much. If we want to keep these enumerable, we should at least add a note about the intentional divergence from ECMAScript.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/739