- From: Ms2ger <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2019 02:10:57 -0700
- To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 7 June 2019 09:11:20 UTC
I don't understand how you would define "includes a nullable type" without it. It is also used in the following requirements on specs: > The number of nullable member types of a union type must be 0 or 1, and if it is 1 then the union type must also not have a dictionary type in its flattened member types. I think this is a very sensible and clear way to deal with nullable types in unions. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/735#issuecomment-499814806
Received on Friday, 7 June 2019 09:11:20 UTC