Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Pointerevent extension (#346)

Thanks @alice.

Regarding the ReSpec issues and everything editorial we are going to fix them all. As a matter of fact this extension document is going to go away and we are going to merge the content one at a time to the main spec and keep everything fixed with no warnings/errors.

Regarding the naming of it, just to give a little background Pointer Events working group actually had all different names including the one you suggested if I recall correctly. We intentionally said we need choose a hard word so people don't just randomly use it as it is a very niche API and hopefully that makes them go and look it up to see what it does and what "coalescing" means really. We knew most of the web apps should not care about or use these points for their use cases and using them would just hurt their performance and we were hoping this hard and more accurate word would serve that purpose as well.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/346#issuecomment-505855760