Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Verifiable Credentials Data Model 1.0 (#343)

@nadalin wrote:
> Would say that that is not true at all as there have been normative reference changes, changes in normative language, I’m making that statement because I submitted these issues.

As one of the Editors of the specification, and as one of the people that either authored or reviewed every single one of the changes you are citing, **your assertions are baseless**. The WG has a resolution for every single one of the changes being non-normative and or non-substantive and is prepared to defend every single one of them in a transition call if that's what it comes down to.

I suggest we let the VCWG Chairs take it from here, @nadalin, as you are not a member of the VCWG and thus it is inappropriate for you to make these sorts of statements as to the status of the work.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/343#issuecomment-506744886