Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Adding self.serviceWorker to service workers. (#1426)

Assuming we want `self.serviceWorker` to always be available, during the very first run of a service worker it won't yet be in the 'installing' state. Looks like we're going to expose the 'parsed' state for the first time.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/pull/1426#issuecomment-500902357

Received on Tuesday, 11 June 2019 15:47:00 UTC