Re: [heycam/webidl] Add async_iterable support (#720)

I think that it should be just fine.  We already have "partial dictionary", "partial interface", "callback interface", etc.  I don't think that a space between "async" and "iterator" will be a problem.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/pull/720#issuecomment-506689419