Re: [heycam/webidl] Add async_iterable support (#720)

I have some concerns about how we will apply this to the Streams standard. The `iterable` definition has this text:

> If a single type parameter is given, then the interface has a value iterator and provides values of the specified type

but `async_iterable` lacks a similar provision. Since a ReadableStream has no keys, this makes application of the standard text difficult. There's nothing meaningful that a `keys()` method could iterate over, and I don't know how `values()` would be different from `entries()`.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/pull/720#issuecomment-505479355