Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Add an option to include frozen documents. (#1442)

Why do we restrict this to window clients?  At least in firefox you can have dedicated workers that are frozen by virtue of their owning document being frozen.

Also, I think if we are adding an `ignoreFrozen` we should add a `client.frozen` attribute for completeness.

Also, I'm not sure this adequately captures the issue where frozen clients should not be considered controlled when determining if an active service worker can be discarded.  We also probably need to ignore frozen clients in clients.claim().  Not sure if your intent is for those to be handled here or in a separate PR.

Finally, exposing the frozen indicator probably needs some discussion amongst others in the group.  We should probably renew discussion in #626.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/pull/1442#issuecomment-505165158