- From: cynthia <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 23:00:58 -0700
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 26 June 2019 06:01:20 UTC
Thank you for the clarification. We discussed this during today's teleconference and as for the state of the spec as of today, we believe we have provided all the technical feedback we felt was necessary. As for the shadow DOM bits and feature policy overlap with another proposal, we'd like to see how the details get fleshed out - and if if feels like there have been substantial enough design changes we'd be happy to look into this again at that point. (Shadow DOM definitely feels like a large enough patch to warrant a second round of reviews.) We are happy to see this move forward, and thank you for bringing this up with us. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/287#issuecomment-505731326
Received on Wednesday, 26 June 2019 06:01:20 UTC