Adam Klein
Aleksey Kulikov
Alex Russell
aliams
Andrea Giammarchi
Andrew Sutherland
Andy Earnshaw
Anne van Kesteren
- Re: [encoding] Consider removing TextEncoder support for UTF-16 (#18) (Monday, 29 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Add a non-normative note stating elements in shadow trees aren't exposed as named properties (#304) (Monday, 29 February)
- [webcomponents] Add dfn.js (#402) (Monday, 29 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] When is the slotting algorithm run (#401) (Monday, 29 February)
- [webcomponents] When is the slotting algorithm run (#401) (Monday, 29 February)
- Re: [dom] Properly check event's stop immediate propagation flag in "inner invoke" (#180) (Monday, 29 February)
- Re: [fetch] Clarify the hooks into RFC6265 (#221) (Monday, 29 February)
- Re: [fetch] Clarify the hooks into RFC6265 (#221) (Monday, 29 February)
- Re: [xhr] abort() handling of state is busted (#54) (Monday, 29 February)
- Re: [xhr] Only set state to unsent when true (#58) (Monday, 29 February)
- [xhr] Only set state to unsent when true (#58) (Monday, 29 February)
- [xhr] Fix Fetch integration (#57) (Monday, 29 February)
- Re: [xhr] abort() handling of state is busted (#54) (Monday, 29 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Ignore title attributes on style elements in shadow trees (#391) (Monday, 29 February)
- Re: [dom] Hyperlink "get the parent" in override defs for easier x-referencing (#182) (Monday, 29 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Ignore title attributes on style elements in shadow trees (#391) (Monday, 29 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Ignore title attributes on style elements in shadow trees (#391) (Monday, 29 February)
- Re: [dom] Hyperlink "get the parent" in override defs for easier x-referencing (#182) (Monday, 29 February)
- Re: [dom] Properly check event's stop immediate propagation flag in "inner invoke" (#180) (Monday, 29 February)
- Re: [fetch] Add option to automatically abort response stream if the data stopped arriving for longer than a specified time (#180) (Monday, 29 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Define some way for foreign fetch to decide on opaqueness of responses (#841) (Monday, 29 February)
- [dom] Define XSLTProcessor (#181) (Monday, 29 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Define some way for foreign fetch to decide on opaqueness of responses (#841) (Monday, 29 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Difference between composed document and document flat tree (#382) (Monday, 29 February)
- Re: [fetch] Proposal: Support GET bodies (#83) (Monday, 29 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Define some way for foreign fetch to decide on opaqueness of responses (#841) (Sunday, 28 February)
- Re: [dom] Properly check event's stop immediate propagation flag in "inner invoke" (#180) (Sunday, 28 February)
- Re: [dom] Properly check event's stop immediate propagation flag in "inner invoke" (#180) (Sunday, 28 February)
- Re: [dom] insert/remove hooks need to be invoked for ancestor changes too (#34) (Sunday, 28 February)
- [xhr] Make FormData a cloneable object (#55) (Sunday, 28 February)
- Re: [fetch] Should we send an Origin header for no-cors fetches? (#225) (Sunday, 28 February)
- Re: [fetch] Add option to automatically abort response stream if the data stopped arriving for longer than a specified time (#180) (Sunday, 28 February)
- Re: [fetch] Clarify the meaning of "" for ReferrerPolicy (#226) (Saturday, 27 February)
- Re: [url] IPv4 parser and the empty string as input (#96) (Saturday, 27 February)
- Re: [webidl] Specify [LegacyUnenumerableNamedProperties] (fixes #82) (#91) (Saturday, 27 February)
- Re: [fetch] Add hooks for foreign fetch (#223) (Saturday, 27 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Define some way for foreign fetch to decide on opaqueness of responses (#841) (Saturday, 27 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Define some way for foreign fetch to decide on opaqueness of responses (#841) (Saturday, 27 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Difference between composed document and document flat tree (#382) (Friday, 26 February)
- Re: [fetch] Clarify what origin the Request constructor needs to check the referrer URL against (#224) (Friday, 26 February)
- Re: [dom] clarify EventTarget.dispatchEvent() (#179) (Friday, 26 February)
- Re: [dom] clarify EventTarget.dispatchEvent() (#179) (Friday, 26 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Define some way for foreign fetch to decide on opaqueness of responses (#841) (Friday, 26 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Difference between composed document and document flat tree (#382) (Friday, 26 February)
- Re: [fetch] Add hooks for foreign fetch (#223) (Friday, 26 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Define some way for foreign fetch to decide on opaqueness of responses (#841) (Friday, 26 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Support module service workers, and update for ES6 (#831) (Friday, 26 February)
- Re: [dom] Drop "keyevents" as an alias of "keyboardevent" for createEvent (#148) (Friday, 26 February)
- Re: [dom] Fix #148: Drop "keyevents" as an alias of "keyboardevent" for createEvent (#178) (Friday, 26 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] A negative tabindex on shadow host should be respected (#399) (Friday, 26 February)
- Re: [fetch] Clarify what origin the Request constructor needs to check the referrer URL against (#224) (Thursday, 25 February)
- [FileAPI] Define cloning of Blob and FileList objects inline (#32) (Thursday, 25 February)
- Re: [dom] Editorial: an affect => an effect (#177) (Thursday, 25 February)
- Re: [dom] Editorial: an affect => an effect (#177) (Thursday, 25 February)
- Re: [dom] Fix typo in IDL comment for Attr's nodeName (#176) (Thursday, 25 February)
- Re: [dom] Fix typo in IDL comment for Attr's nodeName (#176) (Thursday, 25 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Define some way for foreign fetch to decide on opaqueness of responses (#841) (Thursday, 25 February)
- Re: [webidl] Specify [LegacyUnenumerableNamedProperties] (fixes #82) (#91) (Thursday, 25 February)
- Re: [webidl] Specify [LegacyUnenumerableNamedProperties] (fixes #82) (#91) (Thursday, 25 February)
- Re: [fetch] PATCH verb (#50) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [fetch] PATCH verb (#50) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [fetch] PATCH verb (#50) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [fetch] PATCH verb (#50) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [fetch] PATCH verb (#50) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [fetch] PATCH verb (#50) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Need an equivalent definition of 'in a Document' for shadow trees (bugzilla: 26365) (#57) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [webidl] Specify [LegacyUnenumerableNamedProperties] (fixes #82) (#91) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Introduce "delegatesFocus" flag to shadow root (#126) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] setTimeout/setInterval are unreliable in ServiceWorkers (#838) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Support module service workers, and update for ES6 (#831) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] cloneNode on ShadowRoot interface should throw NotSupportedError instead of DATA_CLONE_ERR (#393) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [dom] Use IDL link syntax in NonElementParentNode & ParentNode headings (#175) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [dom] Use IDL link syntax in NonElementParentNode & ParentNode headings (#175) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- [fetch] Clarify obtain a connection with respect to client certificates (#222) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Consider relying on eTags (or other headers) for service worker dependencies to check for updates (#839) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [fetch] Clarify the hooks into RFC6265 (#221) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Support module service workers, and update for ES6 (#831) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] cloneNode on ShadowRoot interface should throw NotSupportedError instead of DATA_CLONE_ERR (#393) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [fetch] Clarify the hooks into RFC6265 (#221) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [fetch] Clarify the hooks into RFC6265 (#221) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [fetch] Clarify the hooks into RFC6265 (#221) (Monday, 22 February)
- Re: [fetch] Clarify the hooks into RFC6265 (#221) (Monday, 22 February)
- Re: [fetch] Clarify the hooks into RFC6265 (#221) (Monday, 22 February)
- Re: [fetch] Clarify the hooks into RFC6265 (#221) (Monday, 22 February)
- Re: [fetch] Clarify the hooks into RFC6265 (#221) (Monday, 22 February)
- Re: [fetch] Clarify the hooks into RFC6265 (#221) (Monday, 22 February)
- Re: [fetch] Clarify the hooks into RFC6265 (#221) (Monday, 22 February)
- Re: [fetch] Clarify the hooks into RFC6265 (#221) (Monday, 22 February)
- Re: [url] "A query must be zero or more URL units. " (#95) (Monday, 22 February)
- Re: [dom] Fix #171: Add Attr#nodeName as an alias for name (#172) (Monday, 22 February)
- Re: [dom] Add Attr#nodeName (#171) (Monday, 22 February)
- Re: [url] "A query must be zero or more URL units. " (#95) (Monday, 22 February)
- Re: [url] "A query must be zero or more URL units. " (#95) (Monday, 22 February)
- Re: [fetch] Vary:-header refers to request headers, not response headers (#220) (Monday, 22 February)
- Re: [fetch] Vary:-header refers to request headers, not response headers (#220) (Monday, 22 February)
- Re: [fetch] Vary:-header refers to request headers, not response headers (#220) (Monday, 22 February)
- Re: [dom] MutationObserver and createShadowRoot() (#170) (Monday, 22 February)
- Re: [webidl] Specify [LegacyUnenumerableNamedProperties] (fixes #82) (#91) (Monday, 22 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Support module service workers, and update for ES6 (#831) (Saturday, 20 February)
- Re: [fetch] CSP Request Header and CORS preflight fetch. (#52) (Saturday, 20 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Foreign fetch (#751) (Saturday, 20 February)
- Re: [dom] Fixes #156. Add legacy event type check to invoke algorithm. (#168) (Saturday, 20 February)
- Re: [dom] Fixes #156. Add legacy event type check to invoke algorithm. (#168) (Saturday, 20 February)
- Re: [dom] Spec dispatching prefixed animation and transition events (#156) (Saturday, 20 February)
- Re: [dom] Duplicated Invoking of an event target (#169) (Saturday, 20 February)
- Re: [dom] Duplicated Invoking of an event target (#169) (Saturday, 20 February)
- Re: [url] Rename non-relative-flag (#89) (Saturday, 20 February)
- Re: [url] Rename non-relative-flag (#89) (Saturday, 20 February)
- Re: [url] Rename non-relative-flag (#89) (Saturday, 20 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Difference between composed document and document flat tree (#382) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Difference between composed document and document flat tree (#382) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Foreign fetch (#751) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Allow respondWith() to be called asynchronously or allow some way to cancel the response. (#836) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Support module service workers, and update for ES6 (#831) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [dom] Fixes #156. Add legacy event type check to invoke algorithm. (#168) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [dom] Fixes #156. Add legacy event type check to invoke algorithm. (#168) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [dom] Fixes #156. Add legacy event type check to invoke algorithm. (#168) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [dom] Fixes #156. Add legacy event type check to invoke algorithm. (#168) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [dom] Fixes #156. Add legacy event type check to invoke algorithm. (#168) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [dom] Fixes #156. Add legacy event type check to invoke algorithm. (#168) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [dom] Fixes #156. Add legacy event type check to invoke algorithm. (#168) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [dom] Fixes #156. Add legacy event type check to invoke algorithm. (#168) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [fetch] CSP Request Header and CORS preflight fetch. (#52) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [fetch] RFC: a mechanism to bypass CORS preflight (#210) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] lang and xml:lang should not use the flat tree (#385) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] lang and xml:lang should not use the flat tree (#385) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [dom] Fixes #156. Add legacy event type check to invoke algorithm. (#168) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [fetch] "If request's origin is "client", set request's ..." (#219) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [fetch] Clarify main fetch recursive invocation from redirect-fetch#217 (#218) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [fetch] Clarify main fetch recursive invocation from redirect-fetch#217 (#218) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [fetch] Be clearer on "main fetch invoked recursively" (#217) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] lang and xml:lang should not use the flat tree (#385) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Difference between composed document and document flat tree (#382) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Update constraints around stopping events (bugzilla: 20247) (#61) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Redesign propagation path (#66) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] lang and xml:lang should not use the flat tree (#385) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Exposing a CanvasImageSource hidden by a Shadow Tree (#388) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [dom] Define event path computation (#165) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [dom] Move "event dispatch pretends Window is Document's parent" magic from HTML into DOM (#164) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [dom] Define event path computation (#165) (Thursday, 18 February)
- [webcomponents] "(Window is omitted)" (#389) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] lang and xml:lang should not use the flat tree (#385) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [dom] Fixes #156. Add legacy event type check to invoke algorithm. (#168) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [dom] Fixes #156. Add legacy event type check to invoke algorithm. (#168) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [dom] Fixes #156. Add legacy event type check to invoke algorithm. (#168) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [fetch] CSP Request Header and CORS preflight fetch. (#52) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [dom] Fixes #156. Add legacy event type check to invoke algorithm. (#168) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [dom] Fixes #156. Add legacy event type check to invoke algorithm. (#168) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [dom] Fixes #156. Add legacy event type check to invoke algorithm. (#168) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [dom] Fixes #156. Add legacy event type check to invoke algorithm. (#168) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Input to flat tree children calculation algorithm seems wrong (#387) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] lang and xml:lang should not use the flat tree (#385) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Shouldn't loadedmetadata also a scoped event? (#277) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [fetch] RFC: a mechanism to bypass CORS preflight (#210) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [fetch] CSP Request Header and CORS preflight fetch. (#52) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [webidl] Specify [LegacyUnenumerableNamedProperties] (fixes #82) (#91) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [dom] Fixes #156. Add legacy event type check to invoke algorithm. (#168) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Redesign propagation path (#66) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- [webcomponents] Input to flat tree children calculation algorithm seems wrong (#387) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- [webcomponents] "Let SLOT be the most preceding slot in TREE whose slot name is NAME if it exists. Otherwise null." (#386) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- [webcomponents] lang and xml:lang should not use the flat tree (#385) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Update constraints around stopping events (bugzilla: 20247) (#61) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Difference between composed document and document flat tree (#382) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- [IndexedDB] Redesign propagation path (#66) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Difference between composed document and document flat tree (#382) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [fetch] Clarify cache mode "default" (#215) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] <iframe> and the History API (#184) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] <iframe> and the History API (#184) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Define the behavior of '::slotted' (the former name is '::content'). (#331) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [xhr] What is the difference between url and current url? (#52) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Define the behavior of '::slotted' (the former name is '::content'). (#331) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: url fragment identifiers should be followed into ShadowDOM (bugzilla: 23161) (#66) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Update constraints around stopping events (bugzilla: 20247) (#61) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Update constraints around stopping events (bugzilla: 20247) (#61) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Difference between composed document and document flat tree (#382) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Convert spec to bikeshed (#835) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [fetch] Clarify main fetch recursive invocation from redirect-fetch#217 (#218) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [fetch] Clarify main fetch recursive invocation from redirect-fetch#217 (#218) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [fetch] Clarify main fetch recursive invocation from redirect-fetch#217 (#218) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [fetch] Clarify main fetch recursive invocation from redirect-fetch#217 (#218) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [fetch] Clarify main fetch recursive invocation from redirect-fetch#217 (#218) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [dom] Fixes #156. Add legacy event type check to invoke algorithm. (#168) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [dom] Fixes #156. Add legacy event type check to invoke algorithm. (#168) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [dom] Fixes #156. Add legacy event type check to invoke algorithm. (#168) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Shared mixin for Document and ShadowRoot (#91) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Shared mixin for Document and ShadowRoot (#91) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Shared mixin for Document and ShadowRoot (#91) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] <iframe> and the History API (#184) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Shared mixin for Document and ShadowRoot (#91) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Shared mixin for Document and ShadowRoot (#91) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Difference between composed document and document flat tree (#382) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Difference between composed document and document flat tree (#382) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Difference between composed document and document flat tree (#382) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [fetch] Fixup the request destination table values (#216) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [fetch] Fixup the request destination table values (#216) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [fetch] Fixup the request destination table values (#216) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Composed child not correctly defined (#383) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Composed child not correctly defined (#383) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [fetch] Fixup the request destination table values (#216) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [fetch] Fixup the request destination table values (#216) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Difference between composed document and document flat tree (#382) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] <iframe> and Window's named properties (#145) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] <iframe> and Window's named properties (#145) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [fetch] Not delete, the hash url in Request and Response (#214) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [url] URL spec change on host setter. (#93) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [url] URL spec change on host setter. (#93) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Difference between composed document and document flat tree (#382) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Composed child not correctly defined (#383) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- [webcomponents] Composed child not correctly defined (#383) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Common interface between Document and ShadowRoot (#91) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- [webcomponents] Difference between composed document and document flat tree (#382) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [webidl] Unenumerable supported property names are badly defined (#79) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Consider augmenting HTML parser to parse <shadow> and <content> just like <template> (bugzilla: 15616) (#59) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Figure out how session history should work for <iframe>s in shadow DOM (bugzilla: 27325) (#184) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Shadow trees should somehow contain base URL information (bugzilla: 22255) (#63) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [url] URL spec change on host setter. (#93) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Upstream Shadow DOM spec to DOM/HTML Standard (#377) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Consider augmenting HTML parser to parse <shadow> and <content> just like <template> (bugzilla: 15616) (#59) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- [fetch] Clarify cache mode "default" (#215) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [fetch] Not delete, the hash url in Request and Response (#214) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [fetch] Redirect handling is wrong for opaqueredirect (#212) (Monday, 15 February)
- Re: [fetch] Redirect handling is wrong for opaqueredirect (#212) (Monday, 15 February)
- Re: [fetch] Redirect on preflighted CORS requests generally impossible (#204) (Monday, 15 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] what should the document base URI for an intercepted navigation (#787) (Monday, 15 February)
- Re: [fetch] Add "must-revalidate" to RequestCache enumeration (#165) (Monday, 15 February)
- Re: [fetch] Not clear what CSP directive is limiting iframes/imports (#166) (Monday, 15 February)
- Re: [fetch] Not clear what CSP directive is limiting iframes/imports (#166) (Monday, 15 February)
- Re: [fetch] Response.prototype.clone() should take into account the internal response. (#148) (Monday, 15 February)
- Re: [fetch] Response.prototype.clone() should take into account the internal response. (#148) (Monday, 15 February)
- Re: [fetch] OpenEndedDictionary clarification (#164) (Monday, 15 February)
- Re: [url] Define a host's "public suffix" and "registrable domain" (#72) (Monday, 15 February)
- Re: [url] Define a host's "public suffix" and "registrable domain" (#72) (Monday, 15 February)
- Re: [fetch] Redirect on preflighted CORS requests generally impossible (#204) (Monday, 15 February)
- Re: [url] Define a host's "public suffix" and "registrable domain" (#72) (Monday, 15 February)
- Re: [fetch] RFC: a mechanism to bypass CORS preflight (#210) (Monday, 15 February)
- Re: [fetch] Redirect handling is wrong for opaqueredirect (#212) (Monday, 15 February)
- Re: [fetch] expand Request.destination with more granular values (#211) (Monday, 15 February)
- Re: [fetch] expand Request.destination with more granular values (#211) (Monday, 15 February)
- Re: [fetch] expand Request.destination with more granular values (#211) (Monday, 15 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] what should the document base URI for an intercepted navigation (#787) (Monday, 15 February)
- Re: [dom] Fix a typo (#166) (Monday, 15 February)
- Re: [url] Fix a minor typo (#91) (Monday, 15 February)
- Re: [url] Fix a minor typo (#91) (Monday, 15 February)
- Re: [url] Have new URLSearchParams() remove a leading "?" (#92) (Monday, 15 February)
- Re: [url] Let's strip leading '?' if present in `URLSearchParams` init string param (#81) (Monday, 15 February)
- Re: [fetch] "A value is a byte sequence that matches the field-content token production." (#213) (Monday, 15 February)
- Re: [dom] Fix a typo (#166) (Monday, 15 February)
- Re: [url] Fix a minor typo (#91) (Monday, 15 February)
- Re: [url] Have new URLSearchParams() remove a leading "?" (#92) (Monday, 15 February)
- [url] Have new URLSearchParams() remove a leading "?" (#92) (Monday, 15 February)
- Re: [url] URLSearchParams: calling .set() and .append() should return itself (#90) (Monday, 15 February)
- Re: [dom] Drop "keyevents" as an alias of "keyboardevent" for createEvent (#148) (Saturday, 13 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Need "slotting changed" event (#288) (Saturday, 13 February)
- Re: [url] Let's strip leading '?' if present in `URLSearchParams` init string param (#81) (Saturday, 13 February)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Saturday, 13 February)
- Re: [url] Let's strip leading '?' if present in `URLSearchParams` init string param (#81) (Saturday, 13 February)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Saturday, 13 February)
- Re: [fetch] expand Request.destination with more granular values (#211) (Saturday, 13 February)
- Re: [fetch] expand Request.destination with more granular values (#211) (Saturday, 13 February)
- Re: [fetch] expand Request.destination with more granular values (#211) (Saturday, 13 February)
- Re: [fetch] expand Request.destination with more granular values (#211) (Saturday, 13 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] html no longer defines "referrer source" (#834) (Saturday, 13 February)
- Re: [fetch] expand Request.destination with more granular values (#211) (Friday, 12 February)
- Re: [fetch] expand Request.destination with more granular values (#211) (Friday, 12 February)
- Re: [fetch] expand Request.destination with more granular values (#211) (Friday, 12 February)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Friday, 12 February)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Friday, 12 February)
- Re: [fetch] Address review comments. (ea70963) (Friday, 12 February)
- Re: [fetch] Address review comments. (ea70963) (Friday, 12 February)
- Re: [fetch] expand Request.destination with more granular values (#211) (Friday, 12 February)
- Re: [fetch] expand Request.destination with more granular values (#211) (Friday, 12 February)
- Re: [fetch] expand Request.destination with more granular values (#211) (Friday, 12 February)
- Re: [spec-reviews] "With Credentials" flag possibly inconsistent with web architecture (#76) (Friday, 12 February)
- Re: [encoding] Serializing internal TextDecoder state? (#7) (Friday, 12 February)
- Re: [encoding] iso-2022-jp encoder XSS risks (#15) (Friday, 12 February)
- Re: [encoding] iso-2022-jp encoder XSS risks (#15) (Friday, 12 February)
- Re: [encoding] Fix #15: prevent ISO-2022-JP encoder attack (#34) (Friday, 12 February)
- Re: [url] The text of this standard appears vulnerable to mismatching other standards (#74) (Thursday, 11 February)
- Re: [url] The text of this standard appears vulnerable to mismatching other standards (#74) (Thursday, 11 February)
- Re: [fetch] expand Request.destination with more granular values (#211) (Thursday, 11 February)
- Re: [fetch] expand Request.destination with more granular values (#211) (Thursday, 11 February)
- Re: [fetch] expand Request.destination with more granular values (#211) (Thursday, 11 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow] activeElement behavior seems to break encapsulation (#358) (Thursday, 11 February)
- Re: [dom] element.furthest(selector) proposal (#163) (Thursday, 11 February)
- Re: [dom] element.furthest(selector) proposal (#163) (Thursday, 11 February)
- Re: [url] Parsing an empty host (#79) (Thursday, 11 February)
- [dom] Define event path computation (#165) (Thursday, 11 February)
- Re: [dom] Issue #156. Add legacy event type check to invoke algorithm. (#158) (Thursday, 11 February)
- Re: [dom] Issue #156. Add legacy event type check to invoke algorithm. (#158) (Thursday, 11 February)
- Re: [url] Status? (#88) (Thursday, 11 February)
- [url] Rename non-relative-flag (#89) (Thursday, 11 February)
- Re: [url] Status? (#88) (Wednesday, 10 February)
- Re: [dom] Proposal to improve the DOM creation api (#150) (Wednesday, 10 February)
- Re: [url] Status? (#88) (Wednesday, 10 February)
- Re: [encoding] Fix #15: prevent ISO-2022-JP encoder attack (#34) (Wednesday, 10 February)
- Re: [encoding] Fix #29: introduce output encoding for URL and HTML forms (#35) (Wednesday, 10 February)
- Re: [encoding] Introduce "output encoding" (#29) (Wednesday, 10 February)
- Re: [encoding] Fix #29: introduce output encoding for URL and HTML forms (#35) (Wednesday, 10 February)
- Re: [encoding] Introduce "output encoding" (#29) (Wednesday, 10 February)
- [encoding] Fix #29: introduce output encoding for URL and HTML forms (#35) (Wednesday, 10 February)
- Re: [encoding] Replacement encoding should handle empty input better (#33) (Wednesday, 10 February)
- Re: [encoding] Replacement encoding should handle empty input better (#33) (Wednesday, 10 February)
- Re: [encoding] iso-2022-jp encoder XSS risks (#15) (Wednesday, 10 February)
- [encoding] Fix #15: prevent ISO-2022-JP encoder attack (#34) (Wednesday, 10 February)
- Re: [encoding] iso-2022-jp encoder XSS risks (#15) (Wednesday, 10 February)
- Re: [encoding] Consider removing TextEncoder support for UTF-16 (#18) (Wednesday, 10 February)
- Re: [encoding] Creating test suites for each encoding. (#30) (Wednesday, 10 February)
- Re: [encoding] Creating test suites for each encoding. (#30) (Wednesday, 10 February)
- Re: [encoding] SHIFT_JISX0213 are not supported. (#31) (Wednesday, 10 February)
- Re: [encoding] SHIFT_JISX0213 are not supported. (#31) (Wednesday, 10 February)
- Re: [encoding] Consider making the DOM name the canonical name (#32) (Wednesday, 10 February)
- Re: [encoding] Consider making the DOM name the canonical name (#32) (Wednesday, 10 February)
- Re: [dom] Text nodes .closest (#161) (Wednesday, 10 February)
- Re: [fetch] expand Request.destination with more granular values (#211) (Wednesday, 10 February)
- Re: [fetch] expand Request.destination with more granular values (#211) (Wednesday, 10 February)
- Re: [fetch] expand Request.destination with more granular values (#211) (Wednesday, 10 February)
- Re: [dom] Text nodes .closest (#161) (Wednesday, 10 February)
- Re: [url] Simplify "." and ".." (#86) (Wednesday, 10 February)
- Re: [url] Simplify "." and ".." (#86) (Wednesday, 10 February)
- Re: [url] Percent-decode more stuff? (#87) (Wednesday, 10 February)
- Re: [dom] Issue #156. Add legacy event type check to invoke algorithm. (#158) (Wednesday, 10 February)
- Re: [dom] Proposal to improve the DOM creation api (#150) (Wednesday, 10 February)
- Re: [dom] Proposal to improve the DOM creation api (#150) (Tuesday, 9 February)
- [url] Define the application/x-www-form-urlencoded MIME type (#85) (Tuesday, 9 February)
- [url] application/x-www-form-urlencoded parser should not invoke decoder directly (#84) (Tuesday, 9 February)
- Re: [fullscreen] What should happen if an element is moved to another document right after requestFullscreen (#33) (Tuesday, 9 February)
- Re: [fetch] expand Request.destination with more granular values (#211) (Tuesday, 9 February)
- [url] application/x-www-form-urlencoded serializer does not handle enough (#83) (Tuesday, 9 February)
- Re: [fullscreen] What should happen if an element is moved to another document right after requestFullscreen (#33) (Tuesday, 9 February)
- Re: [fetch] expand Request.destination with more granular values (#211) (Tuesday, 9 February)
- Re: [dom] Proposal to improve the DOM creation api (#150) (Tuesday, 9 February)
- Re: [dom] Issue #156. Add legacy event type check to invoke algorithm. (#158) (Tuesday, 9 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Specify serviceworker link type for link element and link header. (#828) (Tuesday, 9 February)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Storage persistence (#85) (Tuesday, 9 February)
- Re: [dom] High resolution timing for events (#23) (Monday, 8 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Specify serviceworker link type for link element and link header. (#828) (Monday, 8 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] [imports]: <link rel=import> shouldn't be active when added by innerHTML (bugzilla: 26898) (#193) (Monday, 8 February)
- Re: [url] move myself to being a contributor (#82) (Monday, 8 February)
- Re: [url] move myself to being a contributor (#82) (Monday, 8 February)
- Re: [dom] Issue #156. Add legacy event type check to invoke algorithm. (#158) (Monday, 8 February)
- Re: [dom] Issue #156. Add legacy event type check to invoke algorithm. (#158) (Monday, 8 February)
- Re: [dom] Issue #156. Add legacy event type check to invoke algorithm. (#158) (Monday, 8 February)
- Re: [dom] Issue #156. Add legacy event type check to invoke algorithm. (#158) (Monday, 8 February)
- Re: [dom] Issue #156. Add legacy event type check to invoke algorithm. (#158) (Monday, 8 February)
- Re: [dom] Issue #156. Add legacy event type check to invoke algorithm. (#158) (Monday, 8 February)
- Re: [dom] How looks converting a string to ASCII uppercase/lowercase for other Unicode characters? (#159) (Monday, 8 February)
- Re: [dom] How looks converting a string to ASCII uppercase/lowercase for other Unicode characters? (#159) (Monday, 8 February)
- Re: [dom] Fix #143: make getElementsByTagName match on qualified name (7fd852a) (Monday, 8 February)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Sunday, 7 February)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Sunday, 7 February)
- Re: [url] move myself to being a contributor (#82) (Friday, 5 February)
- Re: [dom] Add description about document.write (#157) (Friday, 5 February)
- Re: [dom] Add description about document.write (#157) (Friday, 5 February)
- Re: [fetch] Introduce HTTP-redirect fetch (#194) (Friday, 5 February)
- [fetch] Redirect handling is wrong for opaqueredirect (#212) (Friday, 5 February)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Friday, 5 February)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Friday, 5 February)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Friday, 5 February)
- Re: [dom] Make addEventListener throw for service worker optimization (#155) (Friday, 5 February)
- Re: [dom] Make addEventListener throw for service worker optimization (#155) (Friday, 5 February)
- Re: [dom] Make addEventListener throw for service worker optimization (#155) (Friday, 5 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Foreign fetch (#751) (Friday, 5 February)
- Re: [xhr] Document responses and responseXML should be null in workers (#51) (Friday, 5 February)
- Re: [xhr] Document responses and responseXML should be null in workers (#51) (Friday, 5 February)
- Re: [url] Let's strip leading '?' if present in `URLSearchParams` init string param (#81) (Thursday, 4 February)
- Re: [dom] Make addEventListener throw for service worker optimization (#155) (Thursday, 4 February)
- Re: [dom] Make addEventListener throw for service worker optimization (#155) (Thursday, 4 February)
- Re: [dom] Make addEventListener throw for service worker optimization (#155) (Thursday, 4 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Replace attached/detached callbacks with insertedIntoDocument/removedFromDocument (#362) (Thursday, 4 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Upstream Shadow DOM spec to DOM/HTML Standard (#377) (Thursday, 4 February)
- Re: [spec-reviews] "With Credentials" flag possibly inconsistent with web architecture (#76) (Thursday, 4 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Foreign fetch (#751) (Wednesday, 3 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Upstream Shadow DOM spec to DOM/HTML Standard (#377) (Wednesday, 3 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Upstream Shadow DOM spec to DOM/HTML Standard (#377) (Wednesday, 3 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Upstream Shadow DOM spec to DOM/HTML Standard (#377) (Wednesday, 3 February)
- Re: [fetch] expand Request.destination with more granular values (#211) (Wednesday, 3 February)
- Re: [dom] Make addEventListener throw for service worker optimization (#155) (Wednesday, 3 February)
- Re: [dom] Make addEventListener throw for service worker optimization (#155) (Wednesday, 3 February)
- Re: [dom] Make addEventListener throw for service worker optimization (#155) (Wednesday, 3 February)
- Re: [dom] Make addEventListener throw for service worker optimization (#155) (Wednesday, 3 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Upstream Shadow DOM spec to DOM/HTML Standard (#377) (Wednesday, 3 February)
- Re: [FileAPI] Persistent blob urls (#27) (Tuesday, 2 February)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Tuesday, 2 February)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Tuesday, 2 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Closed flag proposal breaks ability to audit and automate tests of web pages (#354) (Tuesday, 2 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Closed flag proposal breaks ability to audit and automate tests of web pages (#354) (Tuesday, 2 February)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Tuesday, 2 February)
- Re: [fetch] RFC: a mechanism to bypass CORS preflight (#210) (Tuesday, 2 February)
- Re: [fetch] Introduce HTTP-redirect fetch (#194) (Tuesday, 2 February)
- Re: [fetch] Introduce HTTP-redirect fetch (#194) (Tuesday, 2 February)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Monday, 1 February)
- Re: [fetch] Introduce HTTP-redirect fetch (#194) (Monday, 1 February)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Monday, 1 February)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Monday, 1 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Styling of elements where attachShadow(...) not allowed (#376) (Monday, 1 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Styling of elements where attachShadow(...) not allowed (#376) (Monday, 1 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Disallow attachShadow(...) for some elements. (#110) (Monday, 1 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Disallow attachShadow(...) for some elements. (#110) (Monday, 1 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Issue #110] Have a white list for attachShadow (ada4804) (Monday, 1 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Disallow attachShadow(...) for some elements. (#110) (Monday, 1 February)
Anssi Kostiainen
Anthony Ramine
- Re: [dom] Properly check event's stop immediate propagation flag in "inner invoke" (#180) (Monday, 29 February)
- Re: [dom] Properly check event's stop immediate propagation flag in "inner invoke" (#180) (Monday, 29 February)
- Re: [dom] Properly check event's stop immediate propagation flag in "inner invoke" (#180) (Sunday, 28 February)
- Re: [dom] Properly check event's stop immediate propagation flag in "inner invoke" (#180) (Sunday, 28 February)
- [dom] Properly check event's stop immediate propagation flag in "inner invoke" (#180) (Sunday, 28 February)
- Re: [webidl] Clarify [LegacyUnenumerableNamedProperties] with derived interfaces (#94) (Sunday, 28 February)
- [webidl] Clarify [LegacyUnenumerableNamedProperties] with derived interfaces (#94) (Sunday, 28 February)
- Re: [webidl] Specify [LegacyUnenumerableNamedProperties] (fixes #82) (#91) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [webidl] Specify [LegacyUnenumerableNamedProperties] (fixes #82) (#91) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [webidl] Specify [LegacyUnenumerableNamedProperties] (fixes #82) (#91) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [webidl] Specify [LegacyUnenumerableNamedProperties] (fixes #82) (#91) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [webidl] Specify [LegacyUnenumerableNamedProperties] (fixes #82) (#91) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [webidl] Specify [LegacyUnenumerableNamedProperties] (fixes #82) (#91) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [webidl] Specify [LegacyUnenumerableNamedProperties] (fixes #82) (#91) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [webidl] Specify [LegacyUnenumerableNamedProperties] (fixes #82) (#91) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [webidl] Specify [LegacyUnenumerableNamedProperties] (fixes #82) (#91) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [webidl] Specify [LegacyUnenumerableNamedProperties] (fixes #82) (#91) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [webidl] Specify [LegacyUnenumerableNamedProperties] (fixes #82) (#91) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [webidl] Specify [LegacyUnenumerableNamedProperties] (fixes #82) (#91) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- [webidl] Specify [LegacyUnenumerableNamedProperties] (fixes #82) (#91) (Tuesday, 16 February)
ArkadiuszMichalski
Ben
Ben Kelly
- Re: [ServiceWorker] consider exposing install time on ServiceWorker DOM object (#842) (Thursday, 25 February)
- [ServiceWorker] consider exposing install time on ServiceWorker DOM object (#842) (Thursday, 25 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Define some way for foreign fetch to decide on opaqueness of responses (#841) (Thursday, 25 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] setTimeout/setInterval are unreliable in ServiceWorkers (#838) (Thursday, 25 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] setTimeout/setInterval are unreliable in ServiceWorkers (#838) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] setTimeout/setInterval are unreliable in ServiceWorkers (#838) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] should installing workers be persisted if browser is killed? (#794) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorker Longevity (#840) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] setTimeout/setInterval are unreliable in ServiceWorkers (#838) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] setTimeout/setInterval are unreliable in ServiceWorkers (#838) (Monday, 22 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Allow respondWith() to be called asynchronously or allow some way to cancel the response. (#836) (Saturday, 20 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Allow respondWith() to be called asynchronously or allow some way to cancel the response. (#836) (Saturday, 20 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Cache transactions & fixing `addAll` (#823) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [fetch] Not delete, the hash url in Request and Response (#214) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [fetch] Not delete, the hash url in Request and Response (#214) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [fetch] Not delete, the hash url in Request and Response (#214) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [fetch] Not delete, the hash url in Request and Response (#214) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [fetch] Redirect handling is wrong for opaqueredirect (#212) (Monday, 15 February)
- Re: [fetch] Redirect handling is wrong for opaqueredirect (#212) (Monday, 15 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] what should the document base URI for an intercepted navigation (#787) (Monday, 15 February)
- Re: [fetch] Add "must-revalidate" to RequestCache enumeration (#165) (Monday, 15 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Please deploy dfn.js or something similar (#489) (Friday, 12 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Specify serviceworker link type for link element and link header. (#828) (Wednesday, 10 February)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Tuesday, 9 February)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Monday, 8 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Resolve Job Promise can resolve jobs with an incorrect value (#829) (Friday, 5 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Resolve Job Promise can resolve jobs with an incorrect value (#829) (Friday, 5 February)
- Re: [fetch] RFC: a mechanism to bypass CORS preflight (#210) (Wednesday, 3 February)
- Re: [fetch] expand Request.destination with more granular values (#211) (Wednesday, 3 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Cache transactions & fixing `addAll` (#823) (Monday, 1 February)
Benjamin Gruenbaum
Boris Cherny
Boris Zbarsky
- [xhr] abort() handling of state is busted (#54) (Friday, 26 February)
- Re: [webidl] Define DOMException.prototype.toString() (as this.name + ": " + this.message) (#93) (Thursday, 25 February)
- Re: [webidl] Specify [LegacyUnenumerableNamedProperties] (fixes #82) (#91) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [webidl] Specify [LegacyUnenumerableNamedProperties] (fixes #82) (#91) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [webidl] All supported property names should be enumerable or none of them (#82) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [webidl] Specify [LegacyUnenumerableNamedProperties] (fixes #82) (#91) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [webidl] Specify [LegacyUnenumerableNamedProperties] (fixes #82) (#91) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [dom] High resolution timing for events (#23) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [dom] High resolution timing for events (#23) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [webidl] Specify [LegacyUnenumerableNamedProperties] (fixes #82) (#91) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [webidl] Specify [LegacyUnenumerableNamedProperties] (fixes #82) (#91) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [webidl] Specify [LegacyUnenumerableNamedProperties] (fixes #82) (#91) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [webidl] Specify [LegacyUnenumerableNamedProperties] (fixes #82) (#91) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [webidl] Specify [LegacyUnenumerableNamedProperties] (fixes #82) (#91) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [webidl] Specify [LegacyUnenumerableNamedProperties] (fixes #82) (#91) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [webidl] Specify [LegacyUnenumerableNamedProperties] (fixes #82) (#91) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [webidl] Specify [LegacyUnenumerableNamedProperties] (fixes #82) (#91) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [webidl] Specify [LegacyUnenumerableNamedProperties] (fixes #82) (#91) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- [webidl] Fix https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/67 by making .entries and @@iterator aliases for each other on interfaces with pair iterators. (#90) (Thursday, 11 February)
Brian Kardell
Cameron McCormack
- Re: [webidl] Error Processing should talk about when to use default values for attributes (#92) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [webidl] Error Processing should talk about when to use default values for attributes (#92) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- [webidl] Error Processing should talk about when to use default values for attributes (#92) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [webidl] Grammar issues (#29) (Sunday, 21 February)
- Re: [webidl] Grammar issues (#29) (Sunday, 21 February)
- Re: [webidl] hasOwnProperty fails with ClientRect (#27) (Sunday, 21 February)
- Re: [webidl] hasOwnProperty fails with ClientRect (#27) (Sunday, 21 February)
- Re: [webidl] Specify [LegacyUnenumerableNamedProperties] (fixes #82) (#91) (Sunday, 21 February)
- Re: [webidl] Fragments (#56) (Monday, 15 February)
- Re: [webidl] Fragments (#56) (Monday, 15 February)
- Re: [webidl] Fragments (#56) (Monday, 15 February)
- Re: [webidl] typo fix (#53) (Monday, 15 February)
- Re: [webidl] typo fix (#53) (Monday, 15 February)
- Re: [webidl] Add NotAllowedError exception (#85) (Monday, 15 February)
- Re: [webidl] Add NotAllowedError exception (#85) (Monday, 15 February)
- Re: [webidl] Web Platform WG now replaces Web Applications WG (#74) (Monday, 15 February)
- Re: [webidl] Fix typo in special operations (#81) (Monday, 15 February)
- Re: [webidl] Fix typo in special operations (#81) (Monday, 15 February)
- Re: [webidl] Fix a typo in a link: "environemnt" (#86) (Monday, 15 February)
- Re: [webidl] Fix a typo in a link: "environemnt" (#86) (Monday, 15 February)
- Re: [webidl] Remove references to the removed platform arrays. (#89) (Monday, 15 February)
- Re: [webidl] iterable interface iterators should return the actual key (or the value if there is no key) not an index (#67) (Monday, 15 February)
- Re: [webidl] Fix https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/67 by making .entries and @@iterator aliases for each other on interfaces with pair iterators. (#90) (Monday, 15 February)
- Re: [webidl] Fix some problems with iterable declarations. (#72) (Wednesday, 10 February)
- Re: [webidl] Fix some problems with iterable declarations. (#72) (Wednesday, 10 February)
chaals
Chong Zhang
Chris Rebert
Chris Van
chris van wiemeersch
cpacejo
Crystal Robenhorst
Cyril Auburtin
- [editing] Avoiding nesting like pre > p or p > h2 that works but aren't valid in html (#115) (Friday, 19 February)
- [editing] execCommand('underline') on links (#114) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [selection-api] Need an API to get the current caret rects (#58) (Monday, 15 February)
- Re: [selection-api] Pass the original events or add events types in selectionchange (#65) (Monday, 15 February)
- Re: [dom] element.closest(selector, container) (#162) (Thursday, 11 February)
- Re: [dom] element.closest(selector, container) (#162) (Thursday, 11 February)
- Re: [dom] element.furthest(selector) proposal (#163) (Thursday, 11 February)
- [dom] element.furthest(selector) proposal (#163) (Wednesday, 10 February)
- [dom] element.closest(selector, container) (#162) (Wednesday, 10 February)
- [selection-api] Pass the original events or add events types in selectionchange (#65) (Tuesday, 9 February)
- [dom] Text nodes .closest (#161) (Tuesday, 9 February)
- Re: [dom] classList.toggle(clsName, boolValue) (#160) (Tuesday, 9 February)
- Re: [dom] classList.toggle(clsName, boolValue) (#160) (Tuesday, 9 February)
- [dom] classList.toggle(clsName, boolValue) (#160) (Tuesday, 9 February)
Dan Dascalescu
Dan Robertson
Daniel Appelquist
Daniel Glazman
David Baron
David Bonnet
David Håsäther
Derek
Dimitri Glazkov
Dmitry Titov
Domenic Denicola
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Add worker modules (9111303) (Monday, 29 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Support module service workers, and update for ES6 (#831) (Monday, 29 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Add worker modules (9111303) (Monday, 29 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Add worker modules (9111303) (Monday, 29 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Add worker modules (9111303) (Monday, 29 February)
- Re: [streams] Merge ReadableByteStream into ReadableStream (#418) (Monday, 29 February)
- Re: [streams] Es5 distribution (#432) (Saturday, 27 February)
- Re: [streams] Es5 distribution (#432) (Saturday, 27 February)
- Re: [streams] Fix constness bug (#431) (Saturday, 27 February)
- Re: [streams] Fix constness bug (#431) (Saturday, 27 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] s/document.registerElement/document.defineElement and no return value (#400) (Friday, 26 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Support module service workers, and update for ES6 (#831) (Friday, 26 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Support module service workers, and update for ES6 (#831) (Friday, 26 February)
- [dom] Fix typo in IDL comment for Attr's nodeName (#176) (Thursday, 25 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Support module service workers, and update for ES6 (#831) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Switched custom spec to respec (#396) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Switched custom spec to respec (#396) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [dom] Use IDL link syntax in NonElementParentNode & ParentNode headings (#175) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Support module service workers, and update for ES6 (#831) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Support module service workers, and update for ES6 (#831) (Monday, 22 February)
- Re: [dom] Proposal to improve the DOM creation api (#150) (Saturday, 20 February)
- Re: [url] Rename non-relative-flag (#89) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [url] Rename the non-relative flag to non-hierarchical? (#94) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Support module service workers, and update for ES6 (#831) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Support module service workers, and update for ES6 (#831) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Allow respondWith() to be called asynchronously or allow some way to cancel the response. (#836) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Support module service workers, and update for ES6 (#831) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Dated Space (#102) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [url] URL spec change on host setter. (#93) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [url] URL spec change on host setter. (#93) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- [fetch] "A value is a byte sequence that matches the field-content token production." (#213) (Sunday, 14 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] html no longer defines "referrer source" (#834) (Friday, 12 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] "javascript global environment" and related terms were removed from HTML (#832) (Friday, 12 February)
- [ServiceWorker] {Dedicated,Shared}WorkerGlobalObject do not exist; s/Object/Scope (#833) (Friday, 12 February)
- [ServiceWorker] Support module service workers, and update for ES6 (#831) (Friday, 12 February)
- Re: [dom] Move "event dispatch pretends Window is Document's parent" magic from HTML into DOM (#164) (Thursday, 11 February)
- Re: [streams] Implement flow-control in TransformStream fixes #330 maybe (#429) (Wednesday, 10 February)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Wednesday, 10 February)
- Re: [dom] Proposal to improve the DOM creation api (#150) (Wednesday, 10 February)
- Re: [dom] Proposal to improve the DOM creation api (#150) (Wednesday, 10 February)
- Re: [dom] Text nodes .closest (#161) (Wednesday, 10 February)
- Re: [dom] classList.toggle(clsName, boolValue) (#160) (Tuesday, 9 February)
- Re: [dom] Proposal to improve the DOM creation api (#150) (Tuesday, 9 February)
- Re: [url] Define the application/x-www-form-urlencoded MIME type (#85) (Tuesday, 9 February)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Tuesday, 9 February)
- Re: [dom] High resolution timing for events (#23) (Monday, 8 February)
- Re: [dom] High resolution timing for events (#23) (Monday, 8 February)
- Re: [streams] Factor out some code from the RespondToBYOBReaderIn.*State operations (d0ab233) (Friday, 5 February)
- Re: [streams] Merge ReadableByteStream into ReadableStream (#418) (Friday, 5 February)
- Re: [streams] Expose the pending pullInto request via byobRequest getter than passing as an argument of pullInto (f6a4974) (Friday, 5 February)
- Re: [streams] Add more tests for the respond() method (661e012) (Friday, 5 February)
- Re: [streams] Factor out some code from the RespondToBYOBReaderIn.*State operations (d0ab233) (Friday, 5 February)
- Re: [streams] Expose the pending pullInto request via byobRequest getter than passing as an argument of pullInto (f6a4974) (Friday, 5 February)
- [streams] In the output, sometimes we end up with <b> when we should use <emu-val> (#428) (Friday, 5 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Replace attached/detached callbacks with insertedIntoDocument/removedFromDocument (#362) (Thursday, 4 February)
- Re: [streams] Merge ReadableByteStream into ReadableStream (#418) (Wednesday, 3 February)
- Re: [streams] Merge pull and pullInto (0fe8a8f) (Wednesday, 3 February)
- Re: [streams] Expose the pending pullInto request via byobRequest getter than passing as an argument of pullInto (f6a4974) (Wednesday, 3 February)
- Re: [streams] Expose the pending pullInto request via byobRequest getter than passing as an argument of pullInto (f6a4974) (Wednesday, 3 February)
- Re: [streams] Expose the pending pullInto request via byobRequest getter than passing as an argument of pullInto (f6a4974) (Wednesday, 3 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Replace attached/detached callbacks with insertedIntoDocument/removedFromDocument (#362) (Wednesday, 3 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Upstream Shadow DOM spec to DOM/HTML Standard (#377) (Tuesday, 2 February)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Tuesday, 2 February)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Tuesday, 2 February)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Monday, 1 February)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Monday, 1 February)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Monday, 1 February)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Monday, 1 February)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Monday, 1 February)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Monday, 1 February)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Monday, 1 February)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Monday, 1 February)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Monday, 1 February)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Monday, 1 February)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Monday, 1 February)
- [streams] Define valid queuing strategy (#427) (Monday, 1 February)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Monday, 1 February)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Monday, 1 February)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Monday, 1 February)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Monday, 1 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Disallow attachShadow(...) for some elements. (#110) (Monday, 1 February)
dosaygo
Dylan Barrell
Ehsan Akhgari
Elliott Sprehn
Eric Bidelman
Eric Lawless
Erik Wilde
Gabriel Wicke
Gary Kacmarcik
- Re: [editing] "beforeinput"/"beforeInput" naming clarification (#116) (Monday, 29 February)
- Re: [uievents] Add composition events to examples (#68) (Monday, 29 February)
- Re: [uievents] We should fire beforeInput event before compositioinupdate. (#67) (Monday, 29 February)
- Re: [uievents] We should fire beforeInput event before compositioinupdate. (#67) (Monday, 29 February)
- Re: [uievents] Should DOM be modified before or after compositionupdate? edge/IE do one thing, chrome/saf/firefox do another? (#66) (Monday, 29 February)
- Re: [editing] "beforeinput"/"beforeInput" naming clarification (#116) (Monday, 29 February)
- [uievents] Don't list modifier keys in the uievents spec (link to uievents-key instead) (#69) (Friday, 26 February)
- Re: [uievents-key] Don't list modifier keys in the uievents spec (link to uievents-key instead) (#15) (Friday, 26 February)
- Re: [uievents-key] Don't list modifier keys in the uievents spec (link to uievents-key instead) (#15) (Friday, 26 February)
- [uievents-key] Don't list modifier keys in the uievents spec (link to uievents-key instead) (#15) (Friday, 26 February)
- Re: [uievents-key] Typo: TVSatelliteBC -> TVSatelliteBS (#11) (Friday, 26 February)
- Re: [uievents-code] Mismatch between code value, Volume(Down|Up|Mute) and key value AudioVolume(Down|Up|Mut) (#8) (Friday, 26 February)
- Re: [uievents-code] Rename OSLeft/Right to MetaLeft/Right (#7) (Friday, 26 February)
- Re: [uievents] Should DOM be modified before or after compositionupdate? edge/IE do one thing, chrome/saf/firefox do another? (#66) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- [uievents] Add composition events to examples (#68) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [editing] Base definition and ordering of beforeInput/input events should be in UI events, but the editing specific stuff should be in a separate editing spec. (#99) (Wednesday, 17 February)
Geoffrey Sneddon
gked
Godfrey Chan
Harald Alvestrand
Hayato Ito
- Re: [webcomponents] MutationObserver and attachShadow() (#390) (Monday, 29 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] MutationObserver and attachShadow() (#390) (Monday, 29 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] MutationObserver and attachShadow() (#390) (Monday, 29 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] MutationObserver and attachShadow() (#390) (Monday, 29 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Difference between composed document and document flat tree (#382) (Monday, 29 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Difference between composed document and document flat tree (#382) (Monday, 29 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Adding Declarative Import (#398) (Monday, 29 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Adding Declarative Import (#398) (Monday, 29 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Adding Declarative Import (#398) (Friday, 26 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Difference between composed document and document flat tree (#382) (Friday, 26 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Define the behavior of '::slotted' (the former name is '::content'). (#331) (Friday, 26 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] A negative tabindex on shadow host should be respected (#399) (Friday, 26 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Get ready for automatic publication - the HTML Imports spec (#394) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Get ready for automatic publication - the HTML Imports spec (#394) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Ignore title attributes on style elements in shadow trees (#391) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Need "slotting changed" event (#288) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Need "slotting changed" event (#288) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] "(Window is omitted)" (#389) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Difference between composed document and document flat tree (#382) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Difference between composed document and document flat tree (#382) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Proposed change for Focus Navigation (#381) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Proposed change for Focus Navigation (#381) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Proposed change for Focus Navigation (#381) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] "Let SLOT be the most preceding slot in TREE whose slot name is NAME if it exists. Otherwise null." (#386) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] "Let SLOT be the most preceding slot in TREE whose slot name is NAME if it exists. Otherwise null." (#386) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Input to flat tree children calculation algorithm seems wrong (#387) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] deepPath should return an empty array if it's no longer being dispatched (#373) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] deepPath should return an empty array if it's no longer being dispatched (#373) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Need "slotting changed" event (#288) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] lang and xml:lang should not use the flat tree (#385) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Shouldn't loadedmetadata also a scoped event? (#277) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Shouldn't loadedmetadata also a scoped event? (#277) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Difference between composed document and document flat tree (#382) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Difference between composed document and document flat tree (#382) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Update constraints around stopping events (bugzilla: 20247) (#61) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: url fragment identifiers should be followed into ShadowDOM (bugzilla: 23161) (#66) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Define the behavior of '::slotted' (the former name is '::content'). (#331) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Update Section 6.2 Focus Navigation to reflect TPAC discussion (#375) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Introduce "delegatesFocus" flag to shadow root (#126) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Define the behavior of '::slotted' (the former name is '::content'). (#331) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: url fragment identifiers should be followed into ShadowDOM (bugzilla: 23161) (#66) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Need an equivalent definition of 'in a Document' for shadow trees (bugzilla: 26365) (#57) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Update constraints around stopping events (bugzilla: 20247) (#61) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Update constraints around stopping events (bugzilla: 20247) (#61) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] deepPath should return an empty array if it's no longer being dispatched (#373) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Method for selecting data inside closed shadow root (#378) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Difference between composed document and document flat tree (#382) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Difference between composed document and document flat tree (#382) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] "component tree" is just "node tree" (#384) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] <iframe> and Window's named properties (#145) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Composed child not correctly defined (#383) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Difference between composed document and document flat tree (#382) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Difference between composed document and document flat tree (#382) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Shared mixin for Document and ShadowRoot (#91) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Composed child not correctly defined (#383) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Upstream Shadow DOM spec to DOM/HTML Standard (#377) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Need "slotting changed" event (#288) (Saturday, 13 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Proposed change for Focus Navigation (#381) (Friday, 12 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Proposed change for Focus Navigation (#381) (Friday, 12 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Proposed change for Focus Navigation (#381) (Friday, 12 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Proposed change for Focus Navigation (#381) (Friday, 12 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Proposed change for Focus Navigation (#381) (Friday, 12 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Composition Algorithm shouldn't unwrap slots (#308) (Friday, 12 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Composition Algorithm shouldn't unwrap slots (#308) (Friday, 12 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Need "slotting changed" event (#288) (Friday, 12 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Need "slotting changed" event (#288) (Friday, 12 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Need "slotting changed" event (#288) (Friday, 12 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Need "slotting changed" event (#288) (Friday, 12 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Proposed change for active element algorithm. (#380) (Wednesday, 10 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Proposed change for active element algorithm. (#380) (Tuesday, 9 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow] activeElement behavior seems to break encapsulation (#358) (Monday, 8 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Upstream Shadow DOM spec to DOM/HTML Standard (#377) (Monday, 8 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Fix typos (#379) (Monday, 8 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Upstream Shadow DOM spec to DOM/HTML Standard (#377) (Friday, 5 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Replace attached/detached callbacks with insertedIntoDocument/removedFromDocument (#362) (Thursday, 4 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Styling of elements where attachShadow(...) not allowed (#376) (Thursday, 4 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Changes to Dispatching Events (#274) (Thursday, 4 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Changes to Dispatching Events (#274) (Thursday, 4 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Section 5.7. Retargeting Focus Events is unclear (#374) (Thursday, 4 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Event path trimming should use `scoped` flag and not rely on trustedness (#372) (Thursday, 4 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Event path trimming should only happen for mouseover and mouseout (#330) (Thursday, 4 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Upstream Shadow DOM spec to DOM/HTML Standard (#377) (Thursday, 4 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Method for selecting data inside closed shadow root (#378) (Thursday, 4 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Styling of elements where attachShadow(...) not allowed (#376) (Thursday, 4 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow] activeElement behavior seems to break encapsulation (#358) (Thursday, 4 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow] activeElement behavior seems to break encapsulation (#358) (Thursday, 4 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow] activeElement behavior seems to break encapsulation (#358) (Thursday, 4 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Upstream Shadow DOM spec to DOM/HTML Standard (#377) (Wednesday, 3 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Upstream Shadow DOM spec to DOM/HTML Standard (#377) (Wednesday, 3 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Upstream Shadow DOM spec to DOM/HTML Standard (#377) (Wednesday, 3 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Need mechanism to tell if an element in a ShadowRoot has been inserted into the Document (bugzilla: 22141) (#81) (Wednesday, 3 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow] activeElement behavior seems to break encapsulation (#358) (Wednesday, 3 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Update Section 6.2 Focus Navigation to reflect TPAC discussion (#375) (Wednesday, 3 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Styling of elements where attachShadow(...) not allowed (#376) (Wednesday, 3 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Update Section 6.2 Focus Navigation to reflect TPAC discussion (#375) (Wednesday, 3 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Need "slotting changed" event (#288) (Tuesday, 2 February)
- [webcomponents] Upstream Shadow DOM spec to DOM/HTML Standard (#377) (Tuesday, 2 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] attributeChangedCallback may be expensive for some attributes (#350) (Tuesday, 2 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] attributeChangedCallback may be expensive for some attributes (#350) (Tuesday, 2 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Styling of elements where attachShadow(...) not allowed (#376) (Tuesday, 2 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Styling of elements where attachShadow(...) not allowed (#376) (Monday, 1 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Styling of elements where attachShadow(...) not allowed (#376) (Monday, 1 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Disallow attachShadow(...) for some elements. (#110) (Monday, 1 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Disallow attachShadow(...) for some elements. (#110) (Monday, 1 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Disallow attachShadow(...) for some elements. (#110) (Monday, 1 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Issue #110] Have a white list for attachShadow (ada4804) (Monday, 1 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Issue #110] Have a white list for attachShadow (ada4804) (Monday, 1 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Disallow attachShadow(...) for some elements. (#110) (Monday, 1 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Event path trimming should only happen for mouseover and mouseout (#330) (Monday, 1 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Disallow attachShadow(...) for some elements. (#110) (Monday, 1 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Need "slotting changed" event (#288) (Monday, 1 February)
hiroshige-g
hober
Ian Hickson
Ilya Grigorik
- Re: [fetch] CSP Request Header and CORS preflight fetch. (#52) (Saturday, 20 February)
- Re: [fetch] CSP Request Header and CORS preflight fetch. (#52) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Performance Observer Review (formerly Navigation Timing 2 concepts) (#18) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Performance Observer Review (formerly Navigation Timing 2 concepts) (#18) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [fetch] Fixup the request destination table values (#216) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [fetch] expand Request.destination with more granular values (#211) (Friday, 12 February)
- Re: [fetch] expand Request.destination with more granular values (#211) (Friday, 12 February)
- Re: [fetch] expand Request.destination with more granular values (#211) (Friday, 12 February)
- Re: [fetch] expand Request.destination with more granular values (#211) (Friday, 12 February)
- Re: [fetch] expand Request.destination with more granular values (#211) (Friday, 12 February)
- Re: [fetch] expand Request.destination with more granular values (#211) (Friday, 12 February)
- Re: [fetch] expand Request.destination with more granular values (#211) (Friday, 12 February)
- Re: [fetch] expand Request.destination with more granular values (#211) (Thursday, 11 February)
- Re: [fetch] expand Request.destination with more granular values (#211) (Tuesday, 9 February)
- Re: [fetch] expand Request.destination with more granular values (#211) (Tuesday, 9 February)
- Re: [fetch] expand Request.destination with more granular values (#211) (Monday, 8 February)
- Re: [fetch] Mechanism to indicate "destination context" (#64) (Wednesday, 3 February)
- Re: [fetch] Mechanism to indicate "destination context" (#64) (Wednesday, 3 February)
- [fetch] expand Request.destination with more granular values (#211) (Tuesday, 2 February)
Jake Archibald
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Define some way for foreign fetch to decide on opaqueness of responses (#841) (Friday, 26 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Define some way for foreign fetch to decide on opaqueness of responses (#841) (Thursday, 25 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Define some way for foreign fetch to decide on opaqueness of responses (#841) (Thursday, 25 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Define some way for foreign fetch to decide on opaqueness of responses (#841) (Thursday, 25 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerRegistration should not be a dumping ground for features (#532) (Thursday, 25 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerRegistration should not be a dumping ground for features (#532) (Thursday, 25 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Add cookie accessor/setter methods? (#707) (Thursday, 25 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Define some way for foreign fetch to decide on opaqueness of responses (#841) (Thursday, 25 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Consider relying on eTags (or other headers) for service worker dependencies to check for updates (#839) (Thursday, 25 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] setTimeout/setInterval are unreliable in ServiceWorkers (#838) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Add cookie accessor/setter methods? (#707) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Consider relying on eTags (or other headers) for service worker dependencies to check for updates (#839) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Support modifying cookies on an intercepted fetch (#837) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Consider relying on eTags (or other headers) for service worker dependencies to check for updates (#839) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Allow respondWith() to be called asynchronously or allow some way to cancel the response. (#836) (Monday, 22 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Allow respondWith() to be called asynchronously or allow some way to cancel the response. (#836) (Monday, 22 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Is a new property to get the navigation's target client needed? (#817) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Is a new property to get the navigation's target client needed? (#817) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [fetch] Redirect handling is wrong for opaqueredirect (#212) (Monday, 15 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] what should the document base URI for an intercepted navigation (#787) (Monday, 15 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] what should the document base URI for an intercepted navigation (#787) (Monday, 15 February)
- Re: [url] Let's strip leading '?' if present in `URLSearchParams` init string param (#81) (Saturday, 13 February)
- Re: [url] Let's strip leading '?' if present in `URLSearchParams` init string param (#81) (Saturday, 13 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Create F2F agenda (#806) (Monday, 8 February)
- Re: [fetch] Introduce HTTP-redirect fetch (#194) (Monday, 1 February)
- Re: [fetch] Introduce HTTP-redirect fetch (#194) (Monday, 1 February)
- Re: [fetch] Introduce HTTP-redirect fetch (#194) (Monday, 1 February)
jakub-g
Jan Miksovsky
jan-ivar
Jarek Foksa
Jason Coward
jeisinger
Joe Berkovitz
Joe Pea
Johannes Wilm
- Re: [editing] Cancelable attribute should be removed from the spec because it already referenced in Event.idl (#100) (Monday, 29 February)
- Re: [editing] Cancelable attribute should be removed from the spec because it already referenced in Event.idl (#100) (Monday, 29 February)
- Re: [editing] "beforeinput"/"beforeInput" naming clarification (#116) (Monday, 29 February)
- Re: [editing] "beforeinput"/"beforeInput" naming clarification (#116) (Monday, 29 February)
- Re: [editing] "beforeinput"/"beforeInput" naming clarification (#116) (Monday, 29 February)
- Re: [editing] Base definition and ordering of beforeInput/input events should be in UI events, but the editing specific stuff should be in a separate editing spec. (#99) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [editing] Cancelable attribute should be removed from the spec because it already referenced in Event.idl (#100) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [editing] • Currently, there are multiple documents that pertain to editing. We should merge all the editing related specs into one (#108) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [editing] • Currently, there are multiple documents that pertain to editing. We should merge all the editing related specs into one (#108) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [editing] inputType should be tied to the command names and having that tied to a way of declaring what you support (#110) (Thursday, 4 February)
John Mellor
Jonas Sicking
- Re: [IndexedDB] Allow delete() on index (#68) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [fetch] RFC: a mechanism to bypass CORS preflight (#210) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [fetch] RFC: a mechanism to bypass CORS preflight (#210) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [fetch] RFC: a mechanism to bypass CORS preflight (#210) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [spec-reviews] "With Credentials" flag possibly inconsistent with web architecture (#76) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Make it clearer that aborted upgrade transaction deletes new stores/indexes (#63) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [spec-reviews] "With Credentials" flag possibly inconsistent with web architecture (#76) (Friday, 5 February)
- Re: [fetch] RFC: a mechanism to bypass CORS preflight (#210) (Thursday, 4 February)
- Re: [fetch] RFC: a mechanism to bypass CORS preflight (#210) (Thursday, 4 February)
- Re: [spec-reviews] "With Credentials" flag possibly inconsistent with web architecture (#76) (Wednesday, 3 February)
- Re: [fetch] RFC: a mechanism to bypass CORS preflight (#210) (Wednesday, 3 February)
- Re: [fetch] RFC: a mechanism to bypass CORS preflight (#210) (Wednesday, 3 February)
Josh
Josh Matthews
Joshua Bell
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Add cookie accessor/setter methods? (#707) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Add cookie accessor/setter methods? (#707) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Feature Request: Allow batch adding records (from an Array) (#69) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- [IndexedDB] Allow delete() on index (#68) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Support queries retrieving disjoint sets of keys (#19) (Monday, 22 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Allow respondWith() to be called asynchronously or allow some way to cancel the response. (#836) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Add openCursor(key, primaryKey) and continuePrimaryKey (#14) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Add openCursor(key, primaryKey) and continuePrimaryKey (#14) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Revise references to "default action" (#67) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Redesign propagation path (#66) (Thursday, 18 February)
- [IndexedDB] Revise references to "default action" (#67) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Redesign propagation path (#66) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Support Files stored by reference (#56) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- [IndexedDB] Gather developer feedback on new spec additions (#65) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Allow readwrite transactions restricted to a key range (#59) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Allow readwrite transactions restricted to a key range (#59) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Make it clearer that aborted upgrade transaction deletes new stores/indexes (#63) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [encoding] Consider removing TextEncoder support for UTF-16 (#18) (Wednesday, 10 February)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Support queries retrieving disjoint sets of keys (#19) (Tuesday, 9 February)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Support queries retrieving disjoint sets of keys (#19) (Tuesday, 9 February)
- [IndexedDB] Make it clearer that aborted upgrade transaction deletes new stores/indexes (#63) (Tuesday, 9 February)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Storage persistence (#85) (Monday, 8 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Cache transactions & fixing `addAll` (#823) (Wednesday, 3 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Cache transactions & fixing `addAll` (#823) (Tuesday, 2 February)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Support N-dimensional queries on indexes (#40) (Monday, 1 February)
joshuastobaugh57
Jungkee Song
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Support module service workers, and update for ES6 (#831) (Monday, 29 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Support module service workers, and update for ES6 (#831) (Friday, 26 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Support module service workers, and update for ES6 (#831) (Thursday, 25 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] should installing workers be persisted if browser is killed? (#794) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Support module service workers, and update for ES6 (#831) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Support module service workers, and update for ES6 (#831) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Support module service workers, and update for ES6 (#831) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Support module service workers, and update for ES6 (#831) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Support module service workers, and update for ES6 (#831) (Monday, 22 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Foreign fetch (#751) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Support module service workers, and update for ES6 (#831) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Convert spec to bikeshed (#835) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Support module service workers, and update for ES6 (#831) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Proposal: Optimized No-Fetch Service Workers (#718) (Friday, 12 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Proposal: Optimized No-Fetch Service Workers (#718) (Friday, 12 February)
- Re: [dom] Make addEventListener throw for service worker optimization (#155) (Friday, 12 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Please deploy dfn.js or something similar (#489) (Friday, 12 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Foreign fetch (#751) (Friday, 5 February)
- Re: [dom] Make addEventListener throw for service worker optimization (#155) (Friday, 5 February)
- Re: [dom] Make addEventListener throw for service worker optimization (#155) (Friday, 5 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] should update on navigation or the subsequent updatefound event be delayed until document DOM is loaded? (#788) (Thursday, 4 February)
- Re: [dom] Make addEventListener throw for service worker optimization (#155) (Thursday, 4 February)
- Re: [dom] Make addEventListener throw for service worker optimization (#155) (Thursday, 4 February)
- Re: [dom] Make addEventListener throw for service worker optimization (#155) (Thursday, 4 February)
- Re: [dom] Make addEventListener throw for service worker optimization (#155) (Thursday, 4 February)
- Re: [dom] Make addEventListener throw for service worker optimization (#155) (Tuesday, 2 February)
- Re: [dom] Make addEventListener throw for service worker optimization (#155) (Tuesday, 2 February)
- [dom] Make addEventListener throw for service worker optimization (#155) (Tuesday, 2 February)
- [FileAPI] Make the Blob URL creating/revoking methods not be exposed on the ser… (#31) (Tuesday, 2 February)
jungshik
jungsoo ok
karl
Keith Yeung
Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
Kilcoy
Kit Cambridge
KLuka
Koji Ishii
KOLANICH
Kyaw Tun
Kyle Huey
Larry Masinter
Léonie Watson
Majid Valipour
Manfred Stock
Manish Goregaokar
Manuel Blechschmidt
Marc Hébrard
Marcos Caceres
- Re: [url] URLSearchParams: calling .set() and .append() should return itself (#90) (Monday, 29 February)
- Re: [url] URLSearchParams: calling .set() and .append() should return itself (#90) (Monday, 29 February)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Dated Space (#102) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Add reviewed specs to readme (closes #102) (#103) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [manifest] Allow developers to detect when the user has added the site to their home screen (or equivalent) (#417) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- [spec-reviews] Add reviewed specs to readme (closes #102) (#103) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [manifest] Allow developers to detect when the user has added the site to their home screen (or equivalent) (#417) (Monday, 15 February)
- Re: [manifest] Allow developers to detect when the user has added the site to their home screen (or equivalent) (#417) (Monday, 15 February)
- Re: [url] URLSearchParams: calling .set() and .append() should return itself (#90) (Monday, 15 February)
- [url] URLSearchParams: calling .set() and .append() should return itself (#90) (Monday, 15 February)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Automotive Working Group - API Refactor or Not? (#81) (Wednesday, 10 February)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Dated Space (#102) (Sunday, 7 February)
- Re: [manifest] Enable RDFa (#420) (Friday, 5 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Expose GeoLocation to workers (#745) (Wednesday, 3 February)
- Re: [directory-upload] easier way to determine if something is a directory? (#24) (Monday, 1 February)
- Re: [manifest] Enable RDFa (#420) (Monday, 1 February)
- Re: [manifest] Enable RDFa (#420) (Monday, 1 February)
Marijn Kruisselbrink
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Define some way for foreign fetch to decide on opaqueness of responses (#841) (Friday, 26 February)
- Re: [fetch] Add hooks for foreign fetch (#223) (Friday, 26 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Support module service workers, and update for ES6 (#831) (Friday, 26 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Add cookie accessor/setter methods? (#707) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Interception of the fallback requests initiated from a SW for cross-origin resources (#684) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Foreign fetch (#751) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Foreign fetch (#751) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- [fetch] Add hooks for foreign fetch (#223) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Add cookie accessor/setter methods? (#707) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- [ServiceWorker] Define some way for foreign fetch to decide on opaqueness of responses (#841) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] setTimeout/setInterval are unreliable in ServiceWorkers (#838) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Support module service workers, and update for ES6 (#831) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Support module service workers, and update for ES6 (#831) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] setTimeout/setInterval are unreliable in ServiceWorkers (#838) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] setTimeout/setInterval are unreliable in ServiceWorkers (#838) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Support modifying cookies on an intercepted fetch (#837) (Monday, 22 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Allow respondWith() to be called asynchronously or allow some way to cancel the response. (#836) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Please deploy dfn.js or something similar (#489) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Support module service workers, and update for ES6 (#831) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Support module service workers, and update for ES6 (#831) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [permissions] Add 'background-sync' permission (#60) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Foreign fetch (#751) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Support module service workers, and update for ES6 (#831) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Allow respondWith() to be called asynchronously or allow some way to cancel the response. (#836) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Foreign fetch (#751) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Allow respondWith() to be called asynchronously or allow some way to cancel the response. (#836) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] {Dedicated,Shared}WorkerGlobalObject do not exist; s/Object/Scope (#833) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] {Dedicated,Shared}WorkerGlobalObject do not exist; s/Object/Scope (#833) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Convert spec to bikeshed (#835) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Convert spec to bikeshed (#835) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- [ServiceWorker] Convert spec to bikeshed (#835) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- [ServiceWorker] html no longer defines "referrer source" (#834) (Friday, 12 February)
- [ServiceWorker] "javascript global environment" and related terms were removed from HTML (#832) (Friday, 12 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Expose GeoLocation to workers (#745) (Wednesday, 10 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Please deploy dfn.js or something similar (#489) (Tuesday, 9 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Please deploy dfn.js or something similar (#489) (Tuesday, 9 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Specify serviceworker link type for link element and link header. (#828) (Monday, 8 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Specify serviceworker link type for link element and link header. (#828) (Monday, 8 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Resolve Job Promise can resolve jobs with an incorrect value (#829) (Friday, 5 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Resolve Job Promise can resolve jobs with an incorrect value (#829) (Friday, 5 February)
- [ServiceWorker] Resolve Job Promise can resolve jobs with an incorrect value (#829) (Friday, 5 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Specify serviceworker link type for link element and link header. (#828) (Friday, 5 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Foreign fetch (#751) (Friday, 5 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Foreign fetch (#751) (Friday, 5 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Foreign fetch (#751) (Friday, 5 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Foreign fetch (#751) (Wednesday, 3 February)
- [ServiceWorker] Specify serviceworker link type for link element and link header. (#828) (Wednesday, 3 February)
Mark Nottingham
- Re: [spec-reviews] Create a "advice for spec authors" page (#78) (Monday, 29 February)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Web Background Sync API (#95) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Web Background Sync API (#95) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [fetch] Clarify the hooks into RFC6265 (#221) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [fetch] RFC: a mechanism to bypass CORS preflight (#210) (Saturday, 20 February)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Add reviewed specs to readme (closes #102) (#103) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [fetch] Fix #197: explain cache modes (a47e1e4) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [fetch] Add "must-revalidate" to RequestCache enumeration (#165) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Dated Space (#102) (Sunday, 7 February)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Dated Space (#102) (Sunday, 7 February)
- Re: [fetch] RFC: a mechanism to bypass CORS preflight (#210) (Thursday, 4 February)
- Re: [fetch] RFC: a mechanism to bypass CORS preflight (#210) (Wednesday, 3 February)
- Re: [fetch] RFC: a mechanism to bypass CORS preflight (#210) (Wednesday, 3 February)
- Re: [fetch] RFC: a mechanism to bypass CORS preflight (#210) (Tuesday, 2 February)
Martin Thomson
Max Waterman
Michael van Ouwerkerk
Michiel Bijl
Mike Taylor
- Re: [dom] Fixes #156. Add legacy event type check to invoke algorithm. (#168) (Sunday, 21 February)
- Re: [dom] Fixes #156. Add legacy event type check to invoke algorithm. (#168) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [dom] Fixes #156. Add legacy event type check to invoke algorithm. (#168) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [dom] Fixes #156. Add legacy event type check to invoke algorithm. (#168) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [dom] Fixes #156. Add legacy event type check to invoke algorithm. (#168) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [dom] Fixes #156. Add legacy event type check to invoke algorithm. (#168) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [dom] Fixes #156. Add legacy event type check to invoke algorithm. (#168) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [dom] Fixes #156. Add legacy event type check to invoke algorithm. (#168) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [dom] Fixes #156. Add legacy event type check to invoke algorithm. (#168) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [dom] Fixes #156. Add legacy event type check to invoke algorithm. (#168) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [dom] Fixes #156. Add legacy event type check to invoke algorithm. (#168) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [dom] Fixes #156. Add legacy event type check to invoke algorithm. (#168) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [dom] Fixes #156. Add legacy event type check to invoke algorithm. (#168) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [dom] Fixes #156. Add legacy event type check to invoke algorithm. (#168) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [dom] Fixes #156. Add legacy event type check to invoke algorithm. (#168) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [dom] Fixes #156. Add legacy event type check to invoke algorithm. (#168) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [dom] Fixes #156. Add legacy event type check to invoke algorithm. (#168) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [dom] Fixes #156. Add legacy event type check to invoke algorithm. (#168) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- [dom] Fixes #156. Add legacy event type check to invoke algorithm. (#168) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [dom] Issue #156. Add legacy event type check to invoke algorithm. (#158) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [dom] Issue #156. Add legacy event type check to invoke algorithm. (#158) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [dom] Issue #156. Add legacy event type check to invoke algorithm. (#158) (Wednesday, 10 February)
- Re: [dom] Issue #156. Add legacy event type check to invoke algorithm. (#158) (Wednesday, 10 February)
- Re: [dom] Issue #156. Add legacy event type check to invoke algorithm. (#158) (Wednesday, 10 February)
- Re: [dom] Issue #156. Add legacy event type check to invoke algorithm. (#158) (Tuesday, 9 February)
- Re: [dom] Issue #156. Add legacy event type check to invoke algorithm. (#158) (Monday, 8 February)
- Re: [dom] Issue #156. Add legacy event type check to invoke algorithm. (#158) (Monday, 8 February)
- Re: [dom] Issue #156. Add legacy event type check to invoke algorithm. (#158) (Saturday, 6 February)
- Re: [dom] Issue #156. Add legacy event type check to invoke algorithm. (#158) (Saturday, 6 February)
- [dom] Issue #156. Add legacy event type check to invoke algorithm. (#158) (Saturday, 6 February)
- [dom] Spec dispatching prefixed animation and transition events (#156) (Wednesday, 3 February)
Mike West
Mikhail Losev
Mounir Lamouri
- Re: [permissions] Mediacapture permissions (#57) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [permissions] Mediacapture permissions (#57) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [permissions] Minor editorial fixes (#44) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [permissions] Minor editorial fixes (#44) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [permissions] Mediacapture permissions (#57) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [permissions] Add 'background-sync' permission (#60) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [permissions] Add "wakeLock" to enum PermissionName (#53) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [permissions] Add "wakeLock" to enum PermissionName (#53) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [permissions] Options for "double-keying" permissions (#55) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [permissions] Options for "double-keying" permissions (#55) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [permissions] Mediacapture permissions (#57) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [permissions] Mediacapture permissions (#57) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [permissions] Mediacapture permissions (#57) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [permissions] Mediacapture permissions (#57) (Monday, 15 February)
- Re: [manifest] Allow developers to detect when the user has added the site to their home screen (or equivalent) (#417) (Monday, 15 February)
Ms2ger
Nazar Mokrynskyi
- Re: [webcomponents] Styling of elements where attachShadow(...) not allowed (#376) (Thursday, 4 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Styling of elements where attachShadow(...) not allowed (#376) (Thursday, 4 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Styling of elements where attachShadow(...) not allowed (#376) (Tuesday, 2 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Styling of elements where attachShadow(...) not allowed (#376) (Monday, 1 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Styling of elements where attachShadow(...) not allowed (#376) (Monday, 1 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Issue #110] Have a white list for attachShadow (ada4804) (Monday, 1 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Styling of elements where attachShadow(...) not allowed (#376) (Monday, 1 February)
- [webcomponents] Styling of elements where attachShadow(...) not allowed (#376) (Monday, 1 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Disallow attachShadow(...) for some elements. (#110) (Monday, 1 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Issue #110] Have a white list for attachShadow (ada4804) (Monday, 1 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Disallow attachShadow(...) for some elements. (#110) (Monday, 1 February)
Nico Schlömer
Nicolás Satragno
ojan
Owen Campbell-Moore
Patrick H. Lauke
Peter Beverloo
Petka Antonov
- Re: [permissions] Faking permissions (#54) (Saturday, 6 February)
- Re: [permissions] Faking permissions (#54) (Saturday, 6 February)
- Re: [permissions] Faking permissions (#54) (Saturday, 6 February)
- Re: [permissions] Faking permissions (#54) (Saturday, 6 February)
- Re: [permissions] Faking permissions (#54) (Saturday, 6 February)
- Re: [permissions] Faking permissions (#54) (Saturday, 6 February)
- Re: [permissions] Faking permissions (#54) (Saturday, 6 February)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Tuesday, 2 February)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Tuesday, 2 February)
- Re: [FileAPI] Persistent blob urls (#27) (Tuesday, 2 February)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Tuesday, 2 February)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Tuesday, 2 February)
- Re: [FileAPI] Persistent blob urls (#27) (Tuesday, 2 February)
- Re: [FileAPI] Persistent blob urls (#27) (Tuesday, 2 February)
- Re: [FileAPI] Make the Blob URL creating/revoking methods not be exposed on the ser… (#31) (Tuesday, 2 February)
- Re: [directory-upload] `getContents` poorly supports directories with many files/subdirectories (#3) (Monday, 1 February)
Philip Jägenstedt
- Re: [dom] Define XSLTProcessor (#181) (Monday, 29 February)
- Re: [dom] Define XSLTProcessor (#181) (Monday, 29 February)
- Re: [selection-api] Make some arguments optional (#30) (Monday, 29 February)
- Re: [webidl] Define DOMException.prototype.toString() (as this.name + ": " + this.message) (#93) (Friday, 26 February)
- Re: [webidl] Define DOMException.prototype.toString() (as this.name + ": " + this.message) (#93) (Friday, 26 February)
- [dom] Fix #148: Drop "keyevents" as an alias of "keyboardevent" for createEvent (#178) (Friday, 26 February)
- Re: [dom] Fix #148: Drop "keyevents" as an alias of "keyboardevent" for createEvent (#178) (Friday, 26 February)
- [webidl] Define DOMException.prototype.toString() (as this.name + ": " + this.message) (#93) (Thursday, 25 February)
- Re: [uievents] Expose 'direction-inversion' in wheel events (#57) (Thursday, 25 February)
- Re: [xhr] Abandon hope of removing sync XHR from the web platform? (#20) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [xhr] Abandon hope of removing sync XHR from the web platform? (#20) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [push-api] Have PermissionDeniedError added to WebIDL (#186) (Monday, 22 February)
- [push-api] Have PermissionDeniedError added to WebIDL (#186) (Friday, 19 February)
- [editing] The Ranges type is not defined, should be FrozenArray<Range>? (#113) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [editing] Cancelable attribute should be removed from the spec because it already referenced in Event.idl (#100) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [dom] Drop "keyevents" as an alias of "keyboardevent" for createEvent (#148) (Saturday, 13 February)
- Re: [fullscreen] What should happen if an element is moved to another document right after requestFullscreen (#33) (Tuesday, 9 February)
- Re: [dom] Having getElementsByTagName match on localName is not "web"-compatible for IE and Firefox (#143) (Monday, 8 February)
- Re: [dom] High resolution timing for events (#23) (Tuesday, 2 February)
- Re: [webidl] Add NotAllowedError exception (#85) (Tuesday, 2 February)
Philippe Le Hegaret
- Re: [webcomponents] s/document.registerElement/document.defineElement and no return value (#400) (Sunday, 28 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] s/document.registerElement/document.defineElement and no return value (#400) (Sunday, 28 February)
- [webcomponents] s/document.registerElement/document.defineElement and no return value (#400) (Friday, 26 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Imports typo: s/altorighm/algorithm (#370) (Friday, 26 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Imports typo: s/altorighm/algorithm (#370) (Friday, 26 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Imports bug link is wrong (#371) (Friday, 26 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Imports bug link is wrong (#371) (Friday, 26 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Switched custom spec to respec (#396) (Thursday, 25 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] fixed broken links (#395) (Thursday, 25 February)
- [webcomponents] Imports/respec (#397) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Switched custom spec to respec (#396) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Get ready for automatic publication - the HTML Imports spec (#394) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- [webcomponents] Switched custom spec to respec (#396) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [WebPlatformWG] Add time and place and MS attendees (#13) (Tuesday, 9 February)
- Re: [WebPlatformWG] Update 25janWC.md (#11) (Wednesday, 3 February)
- Re: [WebPlatformWG] Update 25janWC.md (#11) (Wednesday, 3 February)
- Re: [WebPlatformWG] Add Justin Fagnani and Monica Dinculescu to attendee list (#12) (Wednesday, 3 February)
- Re: [WebPlatformWG] Need PAG for "Web Components vs Extract Widget patent"? (#4) (Wednesday, 3 February)
Prayag Verma
Rhys Evans
Richard Maher
- Re: [ServiceWorker] setTimeout/setInterval are unreliable in ServiceWorkers (#838) (Thursday, 25 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] setTimeout/setInterval are unreliable in ServiceWorkers (#838) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] setTimeout/setInterval are unreliable in ServiceWorkers (#838) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] setTimeout/setInterval are unreliable in ServiceWorkers (#838) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorker Longevity (#840) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorker Longevity (#840) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorker Longevity (#840) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] setTimeout/setInterval are unreliable in ServiceWorkers (#838) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Expose GeoLocation to workers (#745) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerRegistration should not be a dumping ground for features (#532) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] setTimeout/setInterval are unreliable in ServiceWorkers (#838) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Expose GeoLocation to workers (#745) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Expose GeoLocation to workers (#745) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Expose GeoLocation to workers (#745) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Expose GeoLocation to workers (#745) (Friday, 12 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Expose GeoLocation to workers (#745) (Friday, 12 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Expose GeoLocation to workers (#745) (Wednesday, 10 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Expose GeoLocation to workers (#745) (Tuesday, 9 February)
Rick Byers
- Re: [touch-events] Add support for uncancelable touch events (#59) (Thursday, 25 February)
- Re: [touch-events] Add support for uncancelable touch events (#59) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [touch-events] Add support for uncancelable touch events (#59) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [touch-events] Not all touch events should be uncancelable (#6) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [touch-events] Add support for uncancelable touch events (#59) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [touch-events] Add support for uncancelable touch events (#59) (Saturday, 20 February)
- [touch-events] Add support for uncancelable touch events (#59) (Saturday, 20 February)
- Re: [touch-events] Convert idl to new respec format (double comma in some dictionary members) (#31) (Saturday, 20 February)
- Re: [touch-events] Convert idl to new respec format (double comma in some dictionary members) (#31) (Saturday, 20 February)
- Re: [dom] High resolution timing for events (#23) (Saturday, 6 February)
- Re: [dom] High resolution timing for events (#23) (Saturday, 6 February)
- Re: [dom] High resolution timing for events (#23) (Saturday, 6 February)
Rodney Rehm
Rogério Chaves
Rune Lillesveen
Russell Bicknell
Ryosuke Niwa
- Re: [selection-api] Make some arguments optional (#30) (Monday, 29 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Figure out terminology for Shadow DOM that everyone agrees on (#382) (Monday, 29 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Ignore title attributes on style elements in shadow trees (#391) (Monday, 29 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] When is the slotting algorithm run (#401) (Monday, 29 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Add dfn.js (#402) (Monday, 29 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] s/document.registerElement/document.defineElement and no return value (#400) (Friday, 26 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Difference between composed document and document flat tree (#382) (Friday, 26 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Introduce "delegatesFocus" flag to shadow root (#126) (Friday, 26 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Define the behavior of '::slotted' (the former name is '::content'). (#331) (Friday, 26 February)
- [webcomponents] A negative tabindex on shadow host should be respected (#399) (Friday, 26 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] cloneNode on ShadowRoot interface should throw NotSupportedError instead of DATA_CLONE_ERR (#393) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] cloneNode on ShadowRoot interface should throw NotSupportedError instead of DATA_CLONE_ERR (#393) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] cloneNode on ShadowRoot interface should throw NotSupportedError instead of DATA_CLONE_ERR (#393) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- [webcomponents] cloneNode on ShadowRoot interface should throw NotSupportedError instead of DATA_CLONE_ERR (#393) (Monday, 22 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Ignore title attributes on style elements in shadow trees (#391) (Monday, 22 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Unable to get Custom Elements working in a static page. (#392) (Monday, 22 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Unable to get Custom Elements working in a static page. (#392) (Monday, 22 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Need "slotting changed" event (#288) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Need "slotting changed" event (#288) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Need "slotting changed" event (#288) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] lang and xml:lang should not use the flat tree (#385) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Introduce "delegatesFocus" flag to shadow root (#126) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Introduce "delegatesFocus" flag to shadow root (#126) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: url fragment identifiers should be followed into ShadowDOM (bugzilla: 23161) (#66) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Update constraints around stopping events (bugzilla: 20247) (#61) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] lang and xml:lang should not use the flat tree (#385) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Shared mixin for Document and ShadowRoot (#91) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Shared mixin for Document and ShadowRoot (#91) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Shared mixin for Document and ShadowRoot (#91) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Parse <slot> like <template> (#59) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Shared mixin for Document and ShadowRoot (#91) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Shared mixin for Document and ShadowRoot (#91) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Difference between composed document and document flat tree (#382) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- [webcomponents] "component tree" is just "node tree" (#384) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Difference between composed document and document flat tree (#382) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Difference between composed document and document flat tree (#382) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Composition Algorithm shouldn't unwrap slots (#308) (Friday, 12 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Composition Algorithm shouldn't unwrap slots (#308) (Friday, 12 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Composition Algorithm shouldn't unwrap slots (#308) (Friday, 12 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Need "slotting changed" event (#288) (Friday, 12 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow] activeElement behavior seems to break encapsulation (#358) (Tuesday, 9 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Proposed change for active element algorithm. (#380) (Tuesday, 9 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] [imports]: <link rel=import> shouldn't be active when added by innerHTML (bugzilla: 26898) (#193) (Tuesday, 9 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Disallow extension of subclasses of HTMLElement and SVGElement/MathMLElement (#363) (Saturday, 6 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Disallow attachShadow(...) for some elements. (#110) (Saturday, 6 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow] activeElement behavior seems to break encapsulation (#358) (Saturday, 6 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Upstream Shadow DOM spec to DOM/HTML Standard (#377) (Thursday, 4 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow] activeElement behavior seems to break encapsulation (#358) (Thursday, 4 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow] activeElement behavior seems to break encapsulation (#358) (Thursday, 4 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow] activeElement behavior seems to break encapsulation (#358) (Thursday, 4 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow] activeElement behavior seems to break encapsulation (#358) (Thursday, 4 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow] activeElement behavior seems to break encapsulation (#358) (Thursday, 4 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Replace attached/detached callbacks with insertedIntoDocument/removedFromDocument (#362) (Thursday, 4 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Upstream Shadow DOM spec to DOM/HTML Standard (#377) (Thursday, 4 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Replace attached/detached callbacks with insertedIntoDocument/removedFromDocument (#362) (Thursday, 4 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Update Section 6.2 Focus Navigation to reflect TPAC discussion (#375) (Thursday, 4 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow] activeElement behavior seems to break encapsulation (#358) (Wednesday, 3 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Update Section 6.2 Focus Navigation to reflect TPAC discussion (#375) (Tuesday, 2 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow] activeElement behavior seems to break encapsulation (#358) (Tuesday, 2 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Update Section 6.2 Focus Navigation to reflect TPAC discussion (#375) (Tuesday, 2 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Update Section 6.2 Focus Navigation to reflect TPAC discussion (#375) (Tuesday, 2 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Need "slotting changed" event (#288) (Tuesday, 2 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Need "slotting changed" event (#288) (Tuesday, 2 February)
S.A.N
Salvador de la Puente González
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Define some way for foreign fetch to decide on opaqueness of responses (#841) (Monday, 29 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Define some way for foreign fetch to decide on opaqueness of responses (#841) (Monday, 29 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Define some way for foreign fetch to decide on opaqueness of responses (#841) (Monday, 29 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Define some way for foreign fetch to decide on opaqueness of responses (#841) (Sunday, 28 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] consider exposing install time on ServiceWorker DOM object (#842) (Sunday, 28 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] setTimeout/setInterval are unreliable in ServiceWorkers (#838) (Thursday, 25 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Consider relying on eTags (or other headers) for service worker dependencies to check for updates (#839) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Consider relying on eTags (or other headers) for service worker dependencies to check for updates (#839) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- [ServiceWorker] Consider relying on eTags (or other headers) for service worker dependencies to check for updates (#839) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Allow respondWith() to be called asynchronously or allow some way to cancel the response. (#836) (Saturday, 20 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Allow respondWith() to be called asynchronously or allow some way to cancel the response. (#836) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Allow respondWith() to be called asynchronously or allow some way to cancel the response. (#836) (Friday, 19 February)
- [ServiceWorker] Allow respondWith() to be called asynchronously or allow some way to cancel the response. (#836) (Thursday, 18 February)
- [ServiceWorker] Take into accounts etags on initialization importScripts responses to update the Service Worker (#830) (Tuesday, 9 February)
Sam Ruby
Scott Graham
Shaikh Sonny Aman
Shane McCarron
Simon Pieters
- Re: [dom] Fix typo in IDL comment for Attr's nodeName (#176) (Thursday, 25 February)
- Re: [dom] Consider specifying document.evaluate and document.createNSResolver (#67) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [url] "A query must be zero or more URL units. " (#95) (Monday, 22 February)
- Re: [dom] Add Attr#nodeName (#171) (Monday, 22 February)
- Re: [dom] Fix #171: Add Attr#nodeName as an alias for name (#172) (Monday, 22 February)
- Re: [dom] Fix #171: Add Attr#nodeName as an alias for name (#172) (Monday, 22 February)
- [dom] Fix #171: Add Attr#nodeName as an alias for name (#172) (Monday, 22 February)
- [dom] Add Attr#nodeName (#171) (Monday, 22 February)
- [url] "A query must be zero or more URL units. " (#95) (Monday, 22 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Should parser extensibility be a design goal? (#113) (Saturday, 20 February)
Simon Sapin
sleevi
smaug----
srcspider
Stefan Penner
Steven Lambert
Steven Vachon
t-tera
Tab Atkins Jr.
Takayoshi Kochi
- Re: [webcomponents] Shadow DOM Cascade Order (#316) (Monday, 29 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] A negative tabindex on shadow host should be respected (#399) (Friday, 26 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Introduce "delegatesFocus" flag to shadow root (#126) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Introduce "delegatesFocus" flag to shadow root (#126) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Introduce "delegatesFocus" flag to shadow root (#126) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Proposed change for Focus Navigation (#381) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Proposed change for Focus Navigation (#381) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Exposing a CanvasImageSource hidden by a Shadow Tree (#388) (Monday, 22 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Proposed change for Focus Navigation (#381) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Proposed change for Focus Navigation (#381) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Proposed change for Focus Navigation (#381) (Monday, 15 February)
- [webcomponents] Proposed change for Focus Navigation (#381) (Friday, 12 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Proposed change for Focus Navigation (#381) (Friday, 12 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Need "slotting changed" event (#288) (Friday, 12 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Style attributes in Shadow DOM Cascade Order Proposal (#316) (Wednesday, 10 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Proposed change for active element algorithm. (#380) (Wednesday, 10 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Proposed change for active element algorithm. (#380) (Wednesday, 10 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Proposed change for active element algorithm. (#380) (Tuesday, 9 February)
- [webcomponents] Proposed change for active element algorithm. (#380) (Tuesday, 9 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow] activeElement behavior seems to break encapsulation (#358) (Monday, 8 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow] activeElement behavior seems to break encapsulation (#358) (Friday, 5 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow] activeElement behavior seems to break encapsulation (#358) (Thursday, 4 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow] activeElement behavior seems to break encapsulation (#358) (Wednesday, 3 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow] activeElement behavior seems to break encapsulation (#358) (Wednesday, 3 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Update Section 6.2 Focus Navigation to reflect TPAC discussion (#375) (Wednesday, 3 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Update Section 6.2 Focus Navigation to reflect TPAC discussion (#375) (Wednesday, 3 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Update Section 6.2 Focus Navigation to reflect TPAC discussion (#375) (Wednesday, 3 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Update Section 6.2 Focus Navigation to reflect TPAC discussion (#375) (Wednesday, 3 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] Update Section 6.2 Focus Navigation to reflect TPAC discussion (#375) (Tuesday, 2 February)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow] activeElement behavior seems to break encapsulation (#358) (Tuesday, 2 February)
Takeshi Yoshino
- Re: [streams] Merge ReadableByteStream into ReadableStream (#418) (Monday, 29 February)
- Re: [streams] Merge ReadableByteStream into ReadableStream (#418) (Monday, 29 February)
- Re: [streams] Merge ReadableByteStream into ReadableStream (#418) (Monday, 29 February)
- Re: [streams] Merge ReadableByteStream into ReadableStream (#430) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [streams] Merge ReadableByteStream into ReadableStream (#418) (Thursday, 18 February)
- [streams] Merge ReadableByteStream into ReadableStream (#430) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [streams] Merge ReadableByteStream into ReadableStream (#418) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [streams] Merge ReadableByteStream into ReadableStream (#418) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [fetch] CSP Request Header and CORS preflight fetch. (#52) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [fetch] CSP Request Header and CORS preflight fetch. (#52) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [xhr] Abandon hope of removing sync XHR from the web platform? (#20) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [streams] Factor out some code from the RespondToBYOBReaderIn.*State operations (d0ab233) (Wednesday, 10 February)
- Re: [streams] Expose the pending pullInto request via byobRequest getter than passing as an argument of pullInto (f6a4974) (Wednesday, 10 February)
- Re: [streams] Add more tests for the respond() method (661e012) (Friday, 5 February)
- Re: [streams] Factor out some code from the RespondToBYOBReaderIn.*State operations (d0ab233) (Friday, 5 February)
- Re: [streams] Merge ReadableByteStream into ReadableStream (#418) (Friday, 5 February)
- Re: [streams] Merge ReadableByteStream into ReadableStream (#418) (Friday, 5 February)
- Re: [streams] Expose the pending pullInto request via byobRequest getter than passing as an argument of pullInto (f6a4974) (Friday, 5 February)
- Re: [streams] Finalize pull/pullInto behavior (#423) (Friday, 5 February)
- Re: [streams] Finalize pull/pullInto behavior (#423) (Friday, 5 February)
- Re: [streams] Merge ReadableByteStream into ReadableStream (#418) (Friday, 5 February)
- Re: [streams] Merge ReadableByteStream into ReadableStream (#418) (Friday, 5 February)
- Re: [streams] Expose the pending pullInto request via byobRequest getter than passing as an argument of pullInto (f6a4974) (Friday, 5 February)
- Re: [streams] Expose the pending pullInto request via byobRequest getter than passing as an argument of pullInto (f6a4974) (Friday, 5 February)
- Re: [streams] Expose the pending pullInto request via byobRequest getter than passing as an argument of pullInto (f6a4974) (Friday, 5 February)
- Re: [streams] Merge ReadableByteStream into ReadableStream (#418) (Wednesday, 3 February)
- Re: [streams] Merge ReadableByteStream into ReadableStream (#418) (Wednesday, 3 February)
- Re: [streams] Merge ReadableByteStream into ReadableStream (#418) (Wednesday, 3 February)
- Re: [fetch] RFC: a mechanism to bypass CORS preflight (#210) (Wednesday, 3 February)
Tier3Software
Tim Berners-Lee
Tobie Langel
Todd Reifsteck
Tomek Wytrębowicz
Tony Cois
Travis Leithead
Trey Shugart
triple-underscore
Valentin Gosu
Wenbo Zhu
Wendy Seltzer
Xiaoqian Wu
Yehuda Katz
- Re: [dom] High resolution timing for events (#23) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [dom] High resolution timing for events (#23) (Tuesday, 9 February)
- Re: [dom] High resolution timing for events (#23) (Tuesday, 9 February)
- Re: [dom] High resolution timing for events (#23) (Monday, 8 February)
- Re: [dom] High resolution timing for events (#23) (Monday, 8 February)
- Re: [dom] High resolution timing for events (#23) (Monday, 8 February)
- Re: [dom] High resolution timing for events (#23) (Saturday, 6 February)
- Re: [dom] High resolution timing for events (#23) (Saturday, 6 February)
- Re: [dom] High resolution timing for events (#23) (Saturday, 6 February)
- Re: [dom] High resolution timing for events (#23) (Saturday, 6 February)
Yoav Weiss
Yutaka Hirano
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Saturday, 13 February)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Saturday, 13 February)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Saturday, 13 February)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Saturday, 13 February)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Thursday, 11 February)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Wednesday, 10 February)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Monday, 8 February)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Monday, 8 February)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Friday, 5 February)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Friday, 5 February)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Friday, 5 February)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Tuesday, 2 February)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Tuesday, 2 February)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Tuesday, 2 February)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Tuesday, 2 February)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Tuesday, 2 February)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Tuesday, 2 February)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Tuesday, 2 February)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Tuesday, 2 February)
- Re: [fetch] Replace byte stream with ReadableStream. (#200) (Tuesday, 2 February)
Last message date: Monday, 29 February 2016 21:59:25 UTC