- From: Ryosuke Niwa <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 12:19:58 -0800
- To: w3c/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 18 February 2016 20:20:29 UTC
@esprehn : I'm fine with using mutation observer if you guys agree that the records are inserted synchronously when nodes are inserted/removed from DOM. @hayatoito didn't want to implement something like that, and wanted a single entry per slot assignment/distribution change per micro-task to avoid style-recalc(?) in Blink, and that's way too weird for mutation observers because the whole point of mutation records is that it gives you records of what had happened. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/288#issuecomment-185897702
Received on Thursday, 18 February 2016 20:20:29 UTC