Re: [dom] Proposal to improve the DOM creation api (#150)

That is true, E4H had a much simpler grammar. I don't know if folks would find that acceptable though. They probably expect similar parsing rules to `<template>` so you can write `<img>` as `<img>` and not `<img/>`, omit `</td>`, etc.

I don't know how familiar you are with the HTML parser, but figuring out what adjustments would need to be made to make ```html`...```` work would be a good first step. Coupled perhaps with a basic algorithm for that template string function.

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/150#issuecomment-181966400