- From: Benjamin Gruenbaum <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2016 23:58:36 -0800
- To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 2 February 2016 07:59:04 UTC
@WebReflection I don't understand. We figured out sound promise cancellation semantics that work and are sound - we didn't a year ago, our understanding of how to deal with promise cancellation should work got a lot better during that time. A year ago I was (happily) using tokens which I barely touch now. It makes absolute sense to use promises for `fetch` imo. With sound cancellation semantics. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/27#issuecomment-178433216
Received on Tuesday, 2 February 2016 07:59:04 UTC