- From: Hayato Ito <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 06:15:47 -0800
- To: w3c/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 18 February 2016 14:16:21 UTC
In general, I am fan of the current naming. The mental model behind the scene is: - We are given multiple `component tree`s. Each represents a unit of a `component`. - Then, they are composed into a one giant tree (of trees). We call it `composed tree (of component trees)`. - Then, we are flattening `composed tree` into a `flat tree`, which is delivered to a user. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/382#issuecomment-185740373
Received on Thursday, 18 February 2016 14:16:21 UTC