- From: Takayoshi Kochi <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 00:12:07 -0800
- To: w3c/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 24 February 2016 08:12:42 UTC
It looks iterative reviews won't work well if completely different structure is suggested. I've written the draft following your suggestion: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1mNV2Z231SrAZuMJvBVNfVNHfULkMwUZOZ75vZM1K9zY/edit?usp=sharing (anyone can comment) For the 3rd algorithm (ordering) in the comment, for document/shadow root scope, the order is probably obvious (tree order), but for slot scope (not fallback content scope) the traversal order is depth-first search on result of getAssignedNodes()? In addition, do we want to describe how to compare 2 focusable areas with tabindex here to get the scoped order of the sequence? That would add almost dead-copy of [HTML 6.4.3](https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/interaction.html#the-tabindex-attribute) and super redundant. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/pull/381#issuecomment-188134052
Received on Wednesday, 24 February 2016 08:12:42 UTC