- From: Simon Pieters <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 03:12:49 -0800
- To: whatwg/url <url@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 22 February 2016 11:13:19 UTC
HTML says > A URL is a valid URL if it conforms to the authoring conformance requirements in the WHATWG URL standard. [URL] I think it used to have normative authoring restrictions based on the document's encoding, but I don't see it anymore. Though I could live with this being done in the HTML spec. I think it's still a good idea to have multiple levels of conformance requirements. Not mentioning the issues because we ban non-utf-8 means that more people will be aware that the issues exist at all. In practical terms, I want validators to whine both about the wrong document encoding and pin-point the places where it is a problem. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/url/issues/95#issuecomment-187127262
Received on Monday, 22 February 2016 11:13:19 UTC