- From: Ryosuke Niwa <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 10:22:59 -0800
- To: w3c/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 16 February 2016 18:23:49 UTC
It seems that the concept of [a component tree](https://w3c.github.io/webcomponents/spec/shadow/#dfn-component-tree) is redundant with [node tree](https://dom.spec.whatwg.org/#concept-node-tree). Also I don't like the term [A primary component tree](https://w3c.github.io/webcomponents/spec/shadow/#dfn-primary-component-tree). "component" seems like an arbitrary prefix that doesn't add any value; It makes me think of a Web component, and that's a bad thing. I think "primary tree" would be a better name. Also, why is `DocumentFragment` left out in this concept? All shadow root should be document fragments, right? --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/384
Received on Tuesday, 16 February 2016 18:23:49 UTC