- From: Ryosuke Niwa <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2016 16:37:57 -0800
- To: w3c/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 4 February 2016 00:38:33 UTC
> If you're saying it doesn't tell readers of the code that, I think that's kind of true, but that will be true of any short and easy to type name. With my developer hat on, I'd personally rather pay the cost once of looking up "connected" if I get confused, than the cost of typing "connectedIntoDocumentCallback" every time I do this. I disagree. In practice, people would just copy & paste a template / name. I'd much rather have a specific name that communicates the meaning than an obnoxiously short name that doesn't tell us any semantics. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/362#issuecomment-179552320
Received on Thursday, 4 February 2016 00:38:33 UTC