- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 08:09:44 -0800
- To: w3c/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 19 February 2016 16:10:20 UTC
As @rniwa keeps pointing out there's also a "slotted tree", no? I think it's a little confusing that we call it a tree of trees. You'd expect in such a scenario that e.g., a child represents a whole tree and not a node. A "composed child" however is defined to be a node. So either we define some kind of transformation node tree -> composed tree whereby it would no longer be a tree of trees, just a fuller node tree, or we make it a tree of trees. @rniwa also objected to "component tree" but it seems like we can get away with just making that "node tree" almost everywhere. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/382#issuecomment-186279887
Received on Friday, 19 February 2016 16:10:20 UTC