- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 23:44:10 -0800
- To: slightlyoff/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
Received on Saturday, 27 February 2016 07:44:40 UTC
My new preferred plan is something like this: * Instead of `makeVisibleTo`, `respondWith()` on `ForeignFetchEvent` is somewhat different and passed a promise for a dictionary, consisting of `{response: ..., origin: ..., headers: ...}`. * You always need to pass a dictionary, even when you're not passing origin/headers. * If you pass headers without origin it'll result in a network error. * Fetch uses this metadata to construct a network error, opaque response, or foreign-fetch filtered response. * Foreign-fetch filtered responses's will need some kind of header safelist stored on them (or maybe on the internal response). Optionally, `ForeignFetchEvent` also has a `validateRepondWith()` with method, that takes a dictionary (not a promise for one) and tells you whether it'll result in a network error, opaque response, or foreign-fetch filtered response. We should only add that after we're absolutely sure that's feasible though. So after all the code paths are worked out and we have the complete setup. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/841#issuecomment-189601139
Received on Saturday, 27 February 2016 07:44:40 UTC