- From: Takeshi Yoshino <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 06:44:26 -0800
- To: whatwg/streams <streams@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 5 February 2016 14:45:02 UTC
Sorry. The suggestion was not to add read(view) on the reader obtained by getReader(), but make the reader obtained by getBYOBReader() (or could be renamed to getByteReader() or something) provide both read() and read(view). --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/streams/pull/418#issuecomment-180384411
Received on Friday, 5 February 2016 14:45:02 UTC