Re: [IndexedDB] Make it clearer that aborted upgrade transaction deletes new stores/indexes (#63) from Jonas Sicking on 2016-02-16 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from February 2016)

From: Jonas Sicking <notifications@github.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 08:47:50 -0800
To: w3c/IndexedDB <IndexedDB@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <w3c/IndexedDB/issues/63/184763948@github.com>

Sounds fine with me. I'm guessing that all relevant algorithms should fail anyway since the transaction is no longer active, but it's good to clarify exactly how it's failing and with what exception.

So yes, treating it as deleted objectstores/indexes seem fine with me.

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/IndexedDB/issues/63#issuecomment-184763948

Received on Tuesday, 16 February 2016 16:48:45 UTC