ietf-http-wg@w3.org from April to June 2007: by date

Saturday, 30 June 2007
- DIFF format sketch edgar@edgarschwarz.de
Friday, 29 June 2007
- Re: Regarding dynamic ip addressed for HTTP Servers. Henrik Nordstrom
- Regarding dynamic ip addressed for HTTP Servers. SiM
Thursday, 28 June 2007
- Re: PATCH Draft James M Snell
- Re: PATCH Draft Stefan Eissing
- Re: PATCH Draft Stefan Eissing
- Re: PATCH Draft Henrik Nordstrom
- RE: PATCH Draft Henrik Nordstrom
- Re: PATCH Draft Jeffrey Mogul
- RE: PATCH Draft Cyrus Daboo
- RE: PATCH Draft Yaron Goland
- RE: Required DIFF format [was Re: PATCH Draft] Yaron Goland
- Re: Required DIFF format [was Re: PATCH Draft] James M Snell
- RE: PATCH and WebDAV, was Re: PATCH Draft Larry Masinter
- RE: PATCH Draft Larry Masinter
- RE: Required DIFF format [was Re: PATCH Draft] Larry Masinter
- Re: PATCH Draft Cyrus Daboo
- Re: PATCH Draft James M Snell
- Re: PATCH and WebDAV, was Re: PATCH Draft James M Snell
- Re: Required DIFF format [was Re: PATCH Draft] James M Snell
- RE: Required DIFF format [was Re: PATCH Draft] Larry Masinter
Tuesday, 26 June 2007
- on the subject of DHCPv4 David W. Hankins
- Re: PATCH and WebDAV, was Re: PATCH Draft Julian Reschke
- Re: PATCH and WebDAV, was Re: PATCH Draft Cyrus Daboo
- Re: PATCH and WebDAV, was Re: PATCH Draft James M Snell
- PATCH and WebDAV, was Re: PATCH Draft Cyrus Daboo
- Re: PATCH Draft Julian Reschke
- Re: Required DIFF format [was Re: PATCH Draft] Julian Reschke
- Re: PATCH Draft Julian Reschke
- Re: PATCH Draft Stefan Eissing
- RE: PATCH Draft Larry Masinter
- Re: PATCH Draft James M Snell
- Re: PATCH Draft Henrik Nordstrom
- Re: PATCH Draft James M Snell
- Re: PATCH Draft Lisa Dusseault
Monday, 25 June 2007
- RE: PATCH Draft Larry Masinter
- Required DIFF format [was Re: PATCH Draft] Lisa Dusseault
- Re: PATCH Draft Henrik Nordstrom
- Re: PATCH Draft Henrik Nordstrom
- Re: PATCH Draft Stefan Eissing
- PATCH Draft James M Snell
- Re: HTTPbis BOF at Chicago Mark Nottingham
Sunday, 24 June 2007
- Re: HTTPbis BOF at Chicago Robert Sayre
Saturday, 23 June 2007
- Re: FYI: HTTP intermediary conformance Mark Nottingham
- Re: FYI: HTTP intermediary conformance Justin Erenkrantz
- FYI: HTTP intermediary conformance Mark Nottingham
Friday, 22 June 2007
- HTTPbis BOF at Chicago Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [RFC] HTTP Information Request Stefanos Harhalakis
- Re: [RFC] HTTP Information Request Stefanos Harhalakis
- Re: [RFC] HTTP Information Request Stefanos Harhalakis
- RE: [RFC] HTTP Information Request Eric Lawrence
- Re: [RFC] HTTP Information Request Harhalakis Stefanos
- RE: [RFC] HTTP Information Request Larry Masinter
- Re: [RFC] HTTP Information Request Mark Nottingham
Thursday, 21 June 2007
- Re: [RFC] HTTP Information Request David Morris
- Re: If-match clarification Jeffrey Mogul
- RE: [RFC] HTTP Information Request Larry Masinter
- RE: [RFC] HTTP Information Request Larry Masinter
- Re: If-match clarification Henrik Nordstrom
Wednesday, 20 June 2007
- Re: If-match clarification Cyrus Daboo
- Re: If-match clarification Henrik Nordstrom
- If-match clarification Cyrus Daboo
- Re: i51 HTTP-date vs. rfc1123-date, was: NEW ISSUE: date formats ?in BNF and spec text, was: RFC 2616 Errata: Misc. Typos Henrik Nordstrom
- Re: i51 HTTP-date vs. rfc1123-date, was: NEW ISSUE: date formats ?in BNF and spec text, was: RFC 2616 Errata: Misc. Typos Julian Reschke
- Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies - OT, topical re WPAD Adrien de Croy
- Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Adrien de Croy
Tuesday, 19 June 2007
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Robert Sayre
- Re: i51 HTTP-date vs. rfc1123-date, was: NEW ISSUE: date formats ?in BNF and spec text, was: RFC 2616 Errata: Misc. Typos Henrik Nordstrom
- Re: i51 HTTP-date vs. rfc1123-date, was: NEW ISSUE: date formats ?in BNF and spec text, was: RFC 2616 Errata: Misc. Typos Julian Reschke
- Re: i51 HTTP-date vs. rfc1123-date, was: NEW ISSUE: date formats ?in BNF and spec text, was: RFC 2616 Errata: Misc. Typos Henrik Nordstrom
- Re: [RFC] HTTP Information Request Stefanos Harhalakis
- Re: [RFC] HTTP Information Request Henrik Nordstrom
- Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Jamie Lokier
- Re: [RFC] HTTP Information Request Stefanos Harhalakis
- Re: i51 HTTP-date vs. rfc1123-date, was: NEW ISSUE: date formats in BNF and spec text, was: RFC 2616 Errata: Misc. Typos Julian Reschke
- Re: i51 HTTP-date vs. rfc1123-date, was: NEW ISSUE: date formats ?in BNF and spec text, was: RFC 2616 Errata: Misc. Typos Henrik Nordstrom
- Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Henrik Nordstrom
- Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Henrik Nordstrom
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Henrik Nordstrom
- i51 HTTP-date vs. rfc1123-date, was: NEW ISSUE: date formats in BNF and spec text, was: RFC 2616 Errata: Misc. Typos Julian Reschke
- Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Adrien de Croy
- Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Adrien de Croy
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Julian Reschke
- Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Adrian Chadd
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Robert Sayre
- Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Adrien de Croy
- Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Adrian Chadd
- Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Adrien de Croy
- Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Adrien de Croy
- Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Mark Andrews
- Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Adrien de Croy
- Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Travis Snoozy
- Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Adrien de Croy
- Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Mark Andrews
- Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Adrien de Croy
- Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Lisa Dusseault
- Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Adrien de Croy
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Henrik Nordstrom
Monday, 18 June 2007
- Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Henrik Nordstrom
- Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Adrien de Croy
- Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Henrik Nordstrom
- Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Henrik Nordstrom
- Re: HTTP version numbers returned by proxies Jeffrey Mogul
- Re: migration to ABNF, was: i31 (qdtext BNF) resolved Julian Reschke
- Re: migration to ABNF, was: i31 (qdtext BNF) resolved Lisa Dusseault
- Re: migration to ABNF, was: i31 (qdtext BNF) resolved Julian Reschke
- Re: migration to ABNF, was: i31 (qdtext BNF) resolved Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: migration to ABNF, was: i31 (qdtext BNF) resolved Julian Reschke
- migration to ABNF, was: i31 (qdtext BNF) resolved Julian Reschke
- i31 (qdtext BNF) resolved Julian Reschke
- Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis tom.petch
- Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Adrien de Croy
- Re: FW: BCP0097 RFC 4897 on Handling Normative References to Standards-Track Documents Julian Reschke
- Re: FW: BCP0097 RFC 4897 on Handling Normative References to Standards-Track Documents Julian Reschke
- RE: protocol support for intercepting proxies Joris Dobbelsteen
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Robert Sayre
- Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Adrien de Croy
- Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Travis Snoozy
- FW: BCP0097 RFC 4897 on Handling Normative References to Standards-Track Documents Larry Masinter
- Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Adrien de Croy
- Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Adrien de Croy
- Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Adrian Chadd
- Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Adrien de Croy
- Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Travis Snoozy
- Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Adrien de Croy
Sunday, 17 June 2007
- Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Adrien de Croy
- Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Travis Snoozy
- Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Henrik Nordstrom
- protocol support for intercepting proxies Adrien de Croy
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Keith Moore
- Re: my action item on issue 52 (Sort 1.3 Terminology) Henrik Nordstrom
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Henrik Nordstrom
Saturday, 16 June 2007
- [RFC] HTTP Information Request Stefanos Harhalakis
- Re: 305 Use Proxy deprecated? Adrien de Croy
- Re: my action item on issue 52 (Sort 1.3 Terminology) Julian Reschke
Friday, 15 June 2007
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Chris Newman
- Re: my action item on issue 52 (Sort 1.3 Terminology) Henrik Nordstrom
- Re: 305 Use Proxy deprecated? Henrik Nordstrom
- Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis Chris Newman
- RE: 305 Use Proxy deprecated? Eric Lawrence
- Re: my action item on issue 52 (Sort 1.3 Terminology) Julian Reschke
- Re: my action item on issue 52 (Sort 1.3 Terminology) Travis Snoozy
- Re: my action item on issue 52 (Sort 1.3 Terminology) Julian Reschke
- my action item on issue 52 (Sort 1.3 Terminology) Julian Reschke
- 305 Use Proxy deprecated? Adrien de Croy
Thursday, 14 June 2007
- Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis Adrien de Croy
- Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis Keith Moore
- Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis tom.petch
- Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis tom.petch
- Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis Keith Moore
- Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis Mark Nottingham
- Re: HTTP version numbers returned by proxies Roy T. Fielding
- Re: HTTP version numbers returned by proxies Travis Snoozy
- Re: HTTP version numbers returned by proxies Adrien de Croy
- Re: HTTP version numbers returned by proxies Travis Snoozy
- HTTP version numbers returned by proxies Adrien de Croy
Wednesday, 13 June 2007
- Client information Stefanos Harhalakis
- Re: RFC2617 erratum (editorial) Julian Reschke
- Re: RFC2617 erratum (editorial) Alexey Melnikov
- Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis lists@ingostruck.de
- Re: RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis lists@ingostruck.de
- Re: [RFC] HTTP Timezone - rev4 Stefanos Harhalakis
Tuesday, 12 June 2007
- Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis Henrik Nordstrom
- Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis Adrien de Croy
- Re: [RFC] HTTP Timezone - rev4 Adrien de Croy
- [RFC] HTTP Timezone - rev4 Stefanos Harhalakis
- Re: RFC2617, digest domains Henrik Nordstrom
- Re: RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis Henrik Nordstrom
- Re: ISSUE 31: qdtext BNF Dan Winship
- Re: ISSUE 31: qdtext BNF Mark Nottingham
- Re: ISSUE 31: qdtext BNF Julian Reschke
- Re: charset / Content-Type BNF flaw in RFC2616 Mark Nottingham
- Re: NEW ISSUE: ISO-8859-1 reference Mark Nottingham
- Re: ISSUE: header length limit with encoded words Mark Nottingham
- Re: NEW ISSUE: classifying and updating informative references Mark Nottingham
- Re: Closing issues 45 (NNTP Reference), 46 (references to RFC1700), 47 (inconsistency in date format explanation), 48 (Date reference typo) Mark Nottingham
- Re: ISSUE 31: qdtext BNF Mark Nottingham
- Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis Mark Nottingham
- Re: RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis lists@ingostruck.de
- Re: RFC2617, digest domains Adrien de Croy
- Re: RFC2617, digest domains Henrik Nordstrom
Monday, 11 June 2007
- Re: RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis Henrik Nordstrom
- Re: RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis lists@ingostruck.de
- Re: RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis Henrik Nordstrom
- Re: Timezone information in HTTP Stefanos Harhalakis
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Henrik Nordstrom
- Re: RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis lists@ingostruck.de
- Re: Timezone information in HTTP Julian Reschke
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Julian Reschke
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Julian Reschke
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Jamie Lokier
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Keith Moore
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Henrik Nordstrom
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Julian Reschke
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Keith Moore
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Henrik Nordstrom
Sunday, 10 June 2007
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Martin Duerst
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Lisa Dusseault
- Re: I-D candidate: draft-sharhalakis-httptz-02.txt V13
Saturday, 9 June 2007
- Re: I-D candidate: draft-sharhalakis-httptz-02.txt Henrik Nordstrom
- Re: Why the use of Date is restricted in requests Henrik Nordstrom
- Fwd: Re: [PHP] [RFC] HTTP timezone Stefanos Harhalakis
- I-D candidate: draft-sharhalakis-httptz-02.txt Stefanos Harhalakis
- Re: Timezone information in HTTP Stefanos Harhalakis
- Re: Timezone information in HTTP Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: Timezone information in HTTP Stefanos Harhalakis
- Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis Henrik Nordstrom
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Henrik Nordstrom
- Re: Timezone information in HTTP Henrik Nordstrom
Friday, 8 June 2007
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Henrik Nordstrom
- Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis Chris Newman
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Chris Newman
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Eliot Lear
- Re: [webkit-dev] Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal Peter Speck
- Re: [webkit-dev] Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal Nicholas Shanks
- Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis Joe Orton
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Yves Lafon
- Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis lists@ingostruck.de
- Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Timezone information in HTTP Julian Reschke
- Re: Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal Travis Snoozy
- Re: [webkit-dev] Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal Nicholas Shanks
- RE: [webkit-dev] Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal Larry Masinter
Thursday, 7 June 2007
- Re: Timezone information in HTTP Stefanos Harhalakis
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Lisa Dusseault
- Re: [webkit-dev] Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal Nicholas Shanks
- Re: Timezone information in HTTP Stefanos Harhalakis
- Re: Timezone information in HTTP Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Timezone information in HTTP Stefanos Harhalakis
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Keith Moore
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Keith Moore
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Keith Moore
- Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis Keith Moore
- Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis lists@ingostruck.de
- Re: RFC2617 erratum (editorial) Henrik Nordstrom
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Henrik Nordstrom
- Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis Henrik Nordstrom
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Henrik Nordstrom
- Re: [webkit-dev] Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal Nicholas Shanks
- Re: [webkit-dev] Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal Peter Speck
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Eliot Lear
- Re: [webkit-dev] Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: [webkit-dev] Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: [webkit-dev] Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal Nicholas Shanks
- Re: Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal Nicholas Shanks
- Re: [webkit-dev] Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal Henrik Nordstrom
- Re: [webkit-dev] Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal Nicholas Shanks
- RE: [webkit-dev] Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal Robert Brewer
- RFC2617 erratum (editorial) Julian Reschke
- Re: [webkit-dev] Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal Peter Speck
- Re: [webkit-dev] Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal Jim Gettys
- RE: Straw-man charter for http-bis Paul Leach
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Paul Hoffman
- Re: Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal Stewart Brodie
- Re: [webkit-dev] Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal Nicholas Shanks
- Re: Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal Travis Snoozy
- Re: [webkit-dev] Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal Nicholas Shanks
- Re: Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal Nicholas Shanks
- Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis Julian Reschke
- Re: Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal Mike Dierken
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Julian Reschke
- Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis Keith Moore
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Keith Moore
- Re: Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal Nicholas Shanks
- Re: Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal Mike Dierken
- Re: Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal Travis Snoozy
- Re: NEW ISSUE: example for matching functions, was: Weak and strong ETags Julian Reschke
- RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis Julian Reschke
- Re: [webkit-dev] Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal Nicholas Shanks
- Re: Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal Julian Reschke
- Re: [webkit-dev] Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal Rob Burns
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Paul Hoffman
- Re: [webkit-dev] Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal Peter Speck
- Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal Nicholas Shanks
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Julian Reschke
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Alexey Melnikov
Wednesday, 6 June 2007
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Chris Newman
Tuesday, 5 June 2007
- Re: Issue i17 (Revise description of the POST method) David Morris
Monday, 4 June 2007
- Re: Issue i17 (Revise description of the POST method) Henrik Nordstrom
- Re: Issue i17 (Revise description of the POST method) Julian Reschke
- Re: Issue i17 (Revise description of the POST method) Henrik Nordstrom
- Re: Issue i17 (Revise description of the POST method) Julian Reschke
- Re: Issue i17 (Revise description of the POST method) Henrik Nordstrom
- Re: Issue i17 (Revise description of the POST method) Julian Reschke
- Re: Issue i17 (Revise description of the POST method) Henrik Nordstrom
Sunday, 3 June 2007
- Issue i17 (Revise description of the POST method) Julian Reschke
Friday, 1 June 2007
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Eliot Lear
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis John C Klensin
Saturday, 2 June 2007
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Henrik Nordstrom
Friday, 1 June 2007
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Jamie Lokier
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Keith Moore
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Julian Reschke
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Paul Hoffman
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Keith Moore
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Julian Reschke
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Keith Moore
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Keith Moore
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Stefan Eissing
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Julian Reschke
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Keith Moore
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Robert Sayre
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Keith Moore
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Keith Moore
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Keith Moore
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis -- call for errata/clarifications to 2617 Leif Johansson
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Mark Nottingham
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Jamie Lokier
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Mark Nottingham
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Roy T. Fielding
- RE: Straw-man charter for http-bis -- call for ?errata/clarifications to 2617 Henrik Nordstrom
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Mark Nottingham
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Robert Sayre
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Mark Nottingham
- RE: Straw-man charter for http-bis -- call for errata/clarifications to 2617 Paul Leach
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Henrik Nordstrom
Thursday, 31 May 2007
- RE: Straw-man charter for http-bis -- call for ?errata/clarifications to 2617 Henrik Nordstrom
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Roy T. Fielding
- RE: Straw-man charter for http-bis -- call for errata/clarifications to 2617 Paul Leach
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Mark Nottingham
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Henrik Nordstrom
- RE: Straw-man charter for http-bis -- call for ?errata/clarifications to 2617 Henrik Nordstrom
- RE: Straw-man charter for http-bis Paul Leach
- RE: Straw-man charter for http-bis -- call for ?errata/clarifications to 2617 Henrik Nordstrom
- RE: Straw-man charter for http-bis -- call for ?errata/clarifications to 2617 Paul Leach
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis -- call for ?errata/clarifications to 2617 Henrik Nordstrom
- RE: Straw-man charter for http-bis -- call for ?errata/clarifications to 2617 Eric Lawrence
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis -- call for ?errata/clarifications to 2617 Cyrus Daboo
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Mark Nottingham
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis -- call for ?errata/clarifications to 2617 Henrik Nordstrom
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Roy T. Fielding
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Keith Moore
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis -- call for errata/clarifications to 2617 Robert Sayre
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis -- call for errata/clarifications to 2617 Cyrus Daboo
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Eliot Lear
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Eliot Lear
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Eliot Lear
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis -- call for errata/clarifications to 2617 Robert Sayre
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Robert Sayre
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis -- call for errata/clarifications to 2617 Julian Reschke
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis -- call for errata/clarifications to 2617 Robert Sayre
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Julian Reschke
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Julian Reschke
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Mark Nottingham
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Julian Reschke
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis -- call for errata/clarifications to 2617 Julian Reschke
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Julian Reschke
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Eliot Lear
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Yves Lafon
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis -- call for errata/clarifications to 2617 Robert Sayre
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis -- call for errata/clarifications to 2617 Mark Nottingham
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Keith Moore
- RE: Straw-man charter for http-bis Larry Masinter
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Henrik Nordstrom
Wednesday, 30 May 2007
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Mark Nottingham
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Paul Hoffman
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Mark Nottingham
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis David Morris
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Robert Sayre
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Julian Reschke
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Eliot Lear
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Julian Reschke
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Julian Reschke
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Keith Moore
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Paul Hoffman
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Julian Reschke
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Paul Hoffman
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Julian Reschke
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Paul Hoffman
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Alexey Melnikov
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Julian Reschke
- Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Alexey Melnikov
- Straw-man charter for http-bis Mark Nottingham
- Re: NEW ISSUE: ISO-8859-1 reference Julian Reschke
Wednesday, 23 May 2007
- charset / Content-Type BNF flaw in RFC2616 Andreas Maier
Friday, 25 May 2007
- Re: HTTP 'HASH' Method Mark Karpelès
Wednesday, 30 May 2007
- Re: NEW ISSUE: example for matching functions, was: Weak ?and?strong ETags Henrik Nordstrom
Tuesday, 29 May 2007
- Re: NEW ISSUE: example for matching functions, was: Weak and?strong ETags Jamie Lokier
- Re: The use of trailers Adrien de Croy
- Re: The use of trailers Henrik Nordstrom
- Re: The use of trailers Adrien de Croy
- Re: NEW ISSUE: example for matching functions, was: Weak ?and?strong ETags Julian Reschke
- Re: NEW ISSUE: example for matching functions, was: Weak ?and?strong ETags Henrik Nordstrom
- Re: NEW ISSUE: example for matching functions, was: Weak and?strong ETags Jamie Lokier
- Re: NEW ISSUE: example for matching functions, was: Weak ?and?strong ETags Henrik Nordstrom
- Re: NEW ISSUE: example for matching functions, was: Weak ?and?strong ETags Henrik Nordstrom
- Re: The use of trailers Henrik Nordstrom
- Re: NEW ISSUE: example for matching functions, was: Weak ?and?strong ETags Jamie Lokier
- Re: NEW ISSUE: example for matching functions, was: Weak ?and?strong ETags Julian Reschke
- Re: The use of trailers Adrien de Croy
- Re: The use of trailers Henrik Nordstrom
Monday, 28 May 2007
- Re: NEW ISSUE: example for matching functions, was: Weak ?and?strong ETags Henrik Nordstrom
- Re: NEW ISSUE: example for matching functions, was: Weak and?strong ETags Julian Reschke
- Re: NEW ISSUE: classifying and updating informative references Julian Reschke
- Re: NEW ISSUE: example for matching functions, was: Weak and ?strong ETags Henrik Nordstrom
- Re: NEW ISSUE: example for matching functions, was: Weak and strong ETags Julian Reschke
- Re: NEW ISSUE: classifying and updating informative references Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: NEW ISSUE: example for matching functions, was: Weak and strong ETags Jamie Lokier
- Re: Planned for Chicago? Alexey Melnikov
- Re: NEW ISSUE: classifying and updating informative references Julian Reschke
- Re: NEW ISSUE: classifying and updating informative references Bjoern Hoehrmann
- NEW ISSUE: classifying and updating informative references Julian Reschke
- NEW ISSUE: ISO-8859-1 reference Julian Reschke
- Closing issues 45 (NNTP Reference), 46 (references to RFC1700), 47 (inconsistency in date format explanation), 48 (Date reference typo) Julian Reschke
- Re: NEW ISSUE: example for matching functions, was: Weak and strong ETags Julian Reschke
- Re: HTTP 'HASH' Method Adrien de Croy
- Re: HTTP 'HASH' Method Henrik Nordstrom
Sunday, 27 May 2007
- Re: HTTP 'HASH' Method Jamie Lokier
- Re: HTTP 'HASH' Method Henrik Nordstrom
- Re: HTTP 'HASH' Method Jamie Lokier
Friday, 25 May 2007
- Re: HTTP 'HASH' Method Jeffrey Mogul
- Re: Planned for Chicago? Robert Sayre
- Re: Escaping control characters in HTTP Digest (RFC 2617) (was: ?Escaping <\> in HTTP Digest (RFC 2617)) Henrik Nordstrom
- RE: Escaping control characters in HTTP Digest (RFC 2617) (was: ?Escaping <\> in HTTP Digest (RFC 2617)) Henrik Nordstrom
- Re: HTTP 'HASH' Method Adrien de Croy
- RE: HTTP 'HASH' Method Eric Lawrence
- Re: HTTP 'HASH' Method Travis Snoozy
- Re: HTTP 'HASH' Method Adrian Chadd
- HTTP 'HASH' Method chown
- Re: Escaping control characters in HTTP Digest (RFC 2617) (was: Escaping <\> in HTTP Digest (RFC 2617)) Robert Sayre
Thursday, 24 May 2007
- RE: Escaping control characters in HTTP Digest (RFC 2617) (was: ?Escaping <\> in HTTP Digest (RFC 2617)) Henrik Nordstrom
- Re: Escaping control characters in HTTP Digest (RFC 2617) (was: Escaping <\> in HTTP Digest (RFC 2617)) Robert Sayre
- RE: Escaping control characters in HTTP Digest (RFC 2617) (was: Escaping <\> in HTTP Digest (RFC 2617)) Eric Lawrence
- Re: Escaping control characters in HTTP Digest (RFC 2617) (was: Escaping <\> in HTTP Digest (RFC 2617)) Robert Sayre
Wednesday, 23 May 2007
- Re: charset / Content-Type BNF flaw in RFC2616 Julian Reschke
- charset / Content-Type BNF flaw in RFC2616 Andreas Maier
Tuesday, 22 May 2007
- Re: ISSUE 31: qdtext BNF Alexey Melnikov
- Re: ISSUE 31: qdtext BNF Julian Reschke
- Re: ISSUE 31: qdtext BNF Alexey Melnikov
Monday, 21 May 2007
- Re: ISSUE 31: qdtext BNF Julian Reschke
Sunday, 20 May 2007
- Re: ISSUE 31: qdtext BNF Alexey Melnikov
Friday, 18 May 2007
- BOF request deadline Monday Lisa Dusseault
Thursday, 17 May 2007
- RE: extending status codes Larry Masinter
- Re: extending status codes Julian Reschke
- Re: extending status codes Bjoern Hoehrmann
- extending status codes Robert Sayre
Wednesday, 16 May 2007
- Re: i19 - bodies on GET -- round 2 Julian Reschke
- Re: i19 - bodies on GET -- round 2 Mark Nottingham
Tuesday, 15 May 2007
- Re: i19 - bodies on GET -- round 2 Julian Reschke
- i19 - bodies on GET -- round 2 Mark Nottingham
Monday, 14 May 2007
- ISSUE: header length limit with encoded words Bjoern Hoehrmann
Monday, 7 May 2007
- Re: Metalink: higher availability and integrity downloads Julian Reschke
- Re: Metalink: higher availability and integrity downloads Anthony Bryan
Thursday, 26 April 2007
- Re: Resourcing HTTP work [was: Planned for Chicago?] Alexey Melnikov
- Re: Metalink: higher availability and integrity downloads Julian Reschke
- Resourcing HTTP work [was: Planned for Chicago?] Mark Nottingham
- Re: Prague meeting report Mark Nottingham
Wednesday, 25 April 2007
- Planned for Chicago? David Morris
- RE: Metalink: higher availability and integrity downloads Eric Lawrence
- Re: NEW ISSUE: updating from RFC2048 to RFC4288 Julian Reschke
- Re: NEW ISSUE: updating from RFC2048 to RFC4288 Alexey Melnikov
- Metalink: higher availability and integrity downloads albryan@comcast.net
- i28 proposed replacement text Yves Lafon
- Prague meeting report Mark Nottingham
Tuesday, 24 April 2007
- Re: handling Proxy-Connection Mark Nottingham
- Re: ISSUE 31: qdtext BNF Mark Nottingham
- Re: WPAD Support for IPv6 (on-topic?) Mark Nottingham
- Re: pipelined client/server behaviour Mark Nottingham
- Re: NEW ISSUE: redirection vs location Mark Nottingham
- Re: New issue: 6.1.1 too vague about parsing requirements Mark Nottingham
- Re: Section 13 Mark Nottingham
- Re: New issue: 6.1.1 can on a quick reading be misread that it's a ?complete list of status codes Mark Nottingham
- Re: [NEW ISSUE] HTTP status code registry, was: Status 102 Mark Nottingham
- Re: NEW ISSUE: updating from RFC2048 to RFC4288 Mark Nottingham
- Re: NEW ISSUE: http URLvs Request-URI, was: 3.2.2 issue Mark Nottingham
Friday, 20 April 2007
- NEW ISSUE: WS in quoted-pair, was: ISSUE 31: qdtext BNF Julian Reschke
- Re: ISSUE 31: qdtext BNF Dan Winship
- ISSUE 31: qdtext BNF Julian Reschke
Thursday, 19 April 2007
- RE: NEW ISSUE: redirection vs location Eric Lawrence
- Re: NEW ISSUE: redirection vs location Asbjørn Ulsberg
- NEW ISSUE: redirection vs location Julian Reschke
Friday, 13 April 2007
- Aqui esta una brillante oportunidad de hacer dinero en tiempo libre, accesible desde Fri, 13 Apr 2007 10:51:42 -0800 daigo
Tuesday, 3 April 2007
- WPAD Support for IPv6 (on-topic?) Eric Lawrence
Monday, 2 April 2007
- Re: pipelined client/server behaviour Adrien de Croy
- Re: pipelined client/server behaviour Henrik Nordstrom
- Re: pipelined client/server behaviour Roy T. Fielding
- Re: pipelined client/server behaviour Jamie Lokier
- Re: Section 13 Henrik Nordstrom
- Re: pipelined client/server behaviour Adrian Chadd
- SRV records and HTTP Mark Andrews
Sunday, 1 April 2007
- Re: pipelined client/server behaviour Jamie Lokier
- Re: pipelined client/server behaviour Jamie Lokier
- Re: pipelined client/server behaviour Roy T. Fielding
- Re: pipelined client/server behaviour Jamie Lokier
- Re: pipelined client/server behaviour Adrien de Croy
- Re: pipelined client/server behaviour Adrien de Croy
- Re: pipelined client/server behaviour Adrian Chadd
- Re: pipelined client/server behaviour Yngve N. Pettersen (Developer Opera Software ASA)
- Re: pipelined client/server behaviour Adrien de Croy
- Re: pipelined client/server behaviour Adrian Chadd
- Re: pipelined client/server behaviour Adrien de Croy

Last message date: Saturday, 30 June 2007 21:40:38 UTC
Archived on: Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:14 UTC

ietf-http-wg@w3.org from April to June 2007 by date