- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 14:25:14 +0200
- To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
- CC: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>, Paul Hoffman <phoffman@imc.org>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Apps Discuss <discuss@apps.ietf.org>
Eliot Lear wrote: > Julian Reschke wrote: >> But that would be an update to RCF2617, not RFC2616bis, right? > > Do we know enough to know? Well, RFC2616 doesn't define authentication, it relies on RFC2617. So as long as we keep that separation, I don't see any problem. Of course I'm making the assumption that we don't want to change this. Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 31 May 2007 12:25:26 UTC