- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:29:02 +1000
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Now issue 61; http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.1/rfc2616bis/issues/#i61 On 20/04/2007, at 12:17 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: > > Hi, > > we recently discussed the definition of the Location header on a > JSR mailing list. > > The definition currently says: <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/ > rfc2616.html#rfc.section.14.30>: > > "The Location response-header field is used to redirect the > recipient to a location other than the Request-URI for completion > of the request or identification of a new resource. (...)" > > The issue is that this can be read as if the "...or > identification..." can be read as applying to the "redirect" part. > > One simple fix seems to be to swap the two parts of the sentence, > as in...: > > "The Location response-header field is used for the identification > of a new resource or to redirect the recipient to a location other > than the Request-URI for completion of the request. (...)" > > > Feedback appreciated, > > Julian > -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Tuesday, 24 April 2007 09:09:30 UTC