- From: Dan Winship <dan.winship@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 10:53:42 -0400
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- CC: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Mark Nottingham wrote: > It's late here, so I may be missing something, but I believe those are > the same, yes. :) He copied the wrong URL :). i64 is a dup of i62. -- Dan > > > On 13/06/2007, at 12:10 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: > >> Mark Nottingham wrote: >>> http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.1/rfc2616bis/issues/#i64 >> >> That's a duplicate of >> <http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.1/rfc2616bis/issues/#i64>, isn't it? >> >> Best regards, Julian > > > -- > Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ >
Received on Tuesday, 12 June 2007 14:53:49 UTC