- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:58:27 +1000
- To: Henrik Nordstrom <hno@squid-cache.org>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Now issue 56; http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.1/rfc2616bis/issues/#i56 On 2007/01/11, at 10:23 PM, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > The second sentence in the first paragraph can on a quick reading be > misread as section 10 contains a complete definiton of all possible > status codes, where it in reality only has the status codes defined by > this RFC. > > Change > > These codes are fully defined in section 10. > > Into > > The status codes defined by this RFC is fully defined in section 10. > > hinting that it's a good idea to read further.. > > Regards > Henrik -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Tuesday, 24 April 2007 07:58:40 UTC