Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis

fre 2007-06-01 klockan 21:25 +0100 skrev Jamie Lokier:

> The errata is a list of potential interop and
> quality-of-implementation issues (not everything on it, but some
> things), which are useful to implementors and people designing similar
> protocols.  It's valuable in its own way, but that doesn't mean
> editing the RFC is not valuable as well.

Also, having the RFC2616bis document WITH the errata corrected greatly
helps verifying the errata.

Additionally it helps to avoid repeated discussions about the same
error, but that's just an positive side effect.

Regards
Henrik