Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis

Julian Reschke wrote:

> Alexey Melnikov wrote:
>
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> Mark Nottingham wrote:
>>
>>> Aug 2008 - Submit HTTP Revision to IESG for consideration as a  
>>> Proposed Standard
>>
>> I think the target should be to move the document to Draft.
>
> Actually, it already *is* a Draft Standard,

Good point.

> so I think the target should be to *keep* it a Draft Standard, with an 
> eye on the possibility to actually get it to full Standard (which may 
> require creative solutions to the MIME dependencies).

Right. I meant "move to Full or at least recycle as Draft".

Received on Wednesday, 30 May 2007 13:29:29 UTC