- From: Stefan Eissing <stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 22:49:13 +0200
- To: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
- Cc: Jeffrey Mogul <Jeff.Mogul@hp.com>, Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>, "'Cyrus Daboo'" <cyrus@daboo.name>, "'James M Snell'" <jasnell@gmail.com>, "'Julian Reschke'" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "'Lisa Dusseault'" <ldusseault@commerce.net>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Am 28.06.2007 um 22:43 schrieb Henrik Nordstrom: > tor 2007-06-28 klockan 13:24 -0700 skrev Jeffrey Mogul: > >> Which means, I think, that the right way to solve Cyrus's >> problem is probably the one he suggested -- add an optional >> method to the PUT request that causes PUT to return the resulting >> entity. > > And the exact same method could be used in PATCH for the same > purpose.. Without any smugness: you mean header not method, right? //Stefan
Received on Thursday, 28 June 2007 20:49:24 UTC