ietf-http-wg@w3.org from April to June 2007 by author

Adrian Chadd

• Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies (Monday, 18 June)
• Re: HTTP 'HASH' Method (Friday, 25 May)
• Re: pipelined client/server behaviour (Monday, 2 April)
• Re: pipelined client/server behaviour (Sunday, 1 April)
• Re: pipelined client/server behaviour (Sunday, 1 April)

Adrien de Croy

• Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies - OT, topical re WPAD (Wednesday, 20 June)
• Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies (Wednesday, 20 June)
• Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies (Monday, 18 June)
• Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies (Monday, 18 June)
• Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies (Monday, 18 June)
• Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies (Monday, 18 June)
• Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies (Monday, 18 June)
• Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies (Monday, 18 June)
• Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies (Monday, 18 June)
• Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies (Sunday, 17 June)
• protocol support for intercepting proxies (Sunday, 17 June)
• Re: 305 Use Proxy deprecated? (Saturday, 16 June)
• 305 Use Proxy deprecated? (Friday, 15 June)
• Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Thursday, 14 June)
• Re: HTTP version numbers returned by proxies (Thursday, 14 June)
• HTTP version numbers returned by proxies (Thursday, 14 June)
• Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Tuesday, 12 June)
• Re: [RFC] HTTP Timezone - rev4 (Tuesday, 12 June)
• Re: RFC2617, digest domains (Tuesday, 12 June)
• Re: The use of trailers (Tuesday, 29 May)
• Re: The use of trailers (Tuesday, 29 May)
• Re: The use of trailers (Tuesday, 29 May)
• Re: HTTP 'HASH' Method (Monday, 28 May)
• Re: HTTP 'HASH' Method (Friday, 25 May)
• Re: pipelined client/server behaviour (Monday, 2 April)
• Re: pipelined client/server behaviour (Sunday, 1 April)
• Re: pipelined client/server behaviour (Sunday, 1 April)
• Re: pipelined client/server behaviour (Sunday, 1 April)
• Re: pipelined client/server behaviour (Sunday, 1 April)

albryan@comcast.net

• Metalink: higher availability and integrity downloads (Wednesday, 25 April)

Alexey Melnikov

• HTTPbis BOF at Chicago (Friday, 22 June)
• Re: RFC2617 erratum (editorial) (Wednesday, 13 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: Planned for Chicago? (Monday, 28 May)
• Re: ISSUE 31: qdtext BNF (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: ISSUE 31: qdtext BNF (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: ISSUE 31: qdtext BNF (Sunday, 20 May)
• Re: Resourcing HTTP work [was: Planned for Chicago?] (Thursday, 26 April)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: updating from RFC2048 to RFC4288 (Wednesday, 25 April)

Andreas Maier

• charset / Content-Type BNF flaw in RFC2616 (Wednesday, 23 May)
• charset / Content-Type BNF flaw in RFC2616 (Wednesday, 23 May)

Anthony Bryan

• Re: Metalink: higher availability and integrity downloads (Monday, 7 May)

Asbjørn Ulsberg

• Re: NEW ISSUE: redirection vs location (Thursday, 19 April)

Bjoern Hoehrmann

• Re: migration to ABNF, was: i31 (qdtext BNF) resolved (Monday, 18 June)
• Re: Timezone information in HTTP (Saturday, 9 June)
• Re: Timezone information in HTTP (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: classifying and updating informative references (Monday, 28 May)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: classifying and updating informative references (Monday, 28 May)
• Re: extending status codes (Thursday, 17 May)
• ISSUE: header length limit with encoded words (Monday, 14 May)

chown

• HTTP 'HASH' Method (Friday, 25 May)

Chris Newman

• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Friday, 15 June)
• Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Friday, 15 June)
• Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Friday, 8 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Friday, 8 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Wednesday, 6 June)

Cyrus Daboo

• RE: PATCH Draft (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: PATCH Draft (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: PATCH and WebDAV, was Re: PATCH Draft (Tuesday, 26 June)
• PATCH and WebDAV, was Re: PATCH Draft (Tuesday, 26 June)
• Re: If-match clarification (Wednesday, 20 June)
• If-match clarification (Wednesday, 20 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis -- call for errata/clarifications to 2617 (Thursday, 31 May)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis -- call for errata/clarifications to 2617 (Thursday, 31 May)

daigo

• Aqui esta una brillante oportunidad de hacer dinero en tiempo libre, accesible desde Fri, 13 Apr 2007 10:51:42 -0800 (Friday, 13 April)

Dan Winship

• Re: ISSUE 31: qdtext BNF (Tuesday, 12 June)
• Re: ISSUE 31: qdtext BNF (Friday, 20 April)

David Morris

• Re: [RFC] HTTP Information Request (Thursday, 21 June)
• Re: Issue i17 (Revise description of the POST method) (Tuesday, 5 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Planned for Chicago? (Wednesday, 25 April)

David W. Hankins

• on the subject of DHCPv4 (Tuesday, 26 June)

edgar@edgarschwarz.de

• DIFF format sketch (Saturday, 30 June)

Eliot Lear

• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Friday, 8 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Friday, 1 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Thursday, 31 May)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Thursday, 31 May)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Thursday, 31 May)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Thursday, 31 May)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Wednesday, 30 May)

Eric Lawrence

• RE: [RFC] HTTP Information Request (Friday, 22 June)
• RE: 305 Use Proxy deprecated? (Friday, 15 June)
• RE: Straw-man charter for http-bis -- call for errata/clarifications to 2617 (Thursday, 31 May)
• RE: HTTP 'HASH' Method (Friday, 25 May)
• RE: Escaping control characters in HTTP Digest (RFC 2617) (was: Escaping <\> in HTTP Digest (RFC 2617)) (Thursday, 24 May)
• RE: Metalink: higher availability and integrity downloads (Wednesday, 25 April)
• RE: NEW ISSUE: redirection vs location (Thursday, 19 April)
• WPAD Support for IPv6 (on-topic?) (Tuesday, 3 April)

Harhalakis Stefanos

• Re: [RFC] HTTP Information Request (Friday, 22 June)

Henrik Nordstrom

• Re: Regarding dynamic ip addressed for HTTP Servers. (Friday, 29 June)
• Re: PATCH Draft (Thursday, 28 June)
• RE: PATCH Draft (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: PATCH Draft (Tuesday, 26 June)
• Re: PATCH Draft (Monday, 25 June)
• Re: PATCH Draft (Monday, 25 June)
• Re: If-match clarification (Thursday, 21 June)
• Re: If-match clarification (Wednesday, 20 June)
• Re: i51 HTTP-date vs. rfc1123-date, was: NEW ISSUE: date formats in BNF and spec text, was: RFC 2616 Errata: Misc. Typos (Wednesday, 20 June)
• Re: i51 HTTP-date vs. rfc1123-date, was: NEW ISSUE: date formats in BNF and spec text, was: RFC 2616 Errata: Misc. Typos (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: i51 HTTP-date vs. rfc1123-date, was: NEW ISSUE: date formats in BNF and spec text, was: RFC 2616 Errata: Misc. Typos (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: [RFC] HTTP Information Request (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: i51 HTTP-date vs. rfc1123-date, was: NEW ISSUE: date formats in BNF and spec text, was: RFC 2616 Errata: Misc. Typos (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies (Monday, 18 June)
• Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies (Monday, 18 June)
• Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies (Monday, 18 June)
• Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies (Sunday, 17 June)
• Re: my action item on issue 52 (Sort 1.3 Terminology) (Sunday, 17 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Sunday, 17 June)
• Re: my action item on issue 52 (Sort 1.3 Terminology) (Friday, 15 June)
• Re: 305 Use Proxy deprecated? (Friday, 15 June)
• Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Tuesday, 12 June)
• Re: RFC2617, digest domains (Tuesday, 12 June)
• Re: RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Tuesday, 12 June)
• Re: RFC2617, digest domains (Tuesday, 12 June)
• Re: RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Monday, 11 June)
• Re: RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Monday, 11 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Monday, 11 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Monday, 11 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Monday, 11 June)
• Re: I-D candidate: draft-sharhalakis-httptz-02.txt (Saturday, 9 June)
• Re: Why the use of Date is restricted in requests (Saturday, 9 June)
• Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Saturday, 9 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Saturday, 9 June)
• Re: Timezone information in HTTP (Saturday, 9 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Friday, 8 June)
• Re: RFC2617 erratum (editorial) (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: [webkit-dev] Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: Issue i17 (Revise description of the POST method) (Monday, 4 June)
• Re: Issue i17 (Revise description of the POST method) (Monday, 4 June)
• Re: Issue i17 (Revise description of the POST method) (Monday, 4 June)
• Re: Issue i17 (Revise description of the POST method) (Monday, 4 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Saturday, 2 June)
• RE: Straw-man charter for http-bis -- call for errata/clarifications to 2617 (Friday, 1 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Friday, 1 June)
• RE: Straw-man charter for http-bis -- call for errata/clarifications to 2617 (Thursday, 31 May)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Thursday, 31 May)
• RE: Straw-man charter for http-bis -- call for errata/clarifications to 2617 (Thursday, 31 May)
• RE: Straw-man charter for http-bis -- call for errata/clarifications to 2617 (Thursday, 31 May)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis -- call for errata/clarifications to 2617 (Thursday, 31 May)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis -- call for errata/clarifications to 2617 (Thursday, 31 May)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Thursday, 31 May)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: example for matching functions, was: Weak and strong ETags (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: The use of trailers (Tuesday, 29 May)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: example for matching functions, was: Weak and strong ETags (Tuesday, 29 May)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: example for matching functions, was: Weak and strong ETags (Tuesday, 29 May)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: example for matching functions, was: Weak and strong ETags (Tuesday, 29 May)
• Re: The use of trailers (Tuesday, 29 May)
• Re: The use of trailers (Tuesday, 29 May)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: example for matching functions, was: Weak and strong ETags (Monday, 28 May)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: example for matching functions, was: Weak and strong ETags (Monday, 28 May)
• Re: HTTP 'HASH' Method (Monday, 28 May)
• Re: HTTP 'HASH' Method (Sunday, 27 May)
• Re: Escaping control characters in HTTP Digest (RFC 2617) (was: Escaping <\> in HTTP Digest (RFC 2617)) (Friday, 25 May)
• RE: Escaping control characters in HTTP Digest (RFC 2617) (was: Escaping <\> in HTTP Digest (RFC 2617)) (Friday, 25 May)
• RE: Escaping control characters in HTTP Digest (RFC 2617) (was: Escaping <\> in HTTP Digest (RFC 2617)) (Thursday, 24 May)
• Re: pipelined client/server behaviour (Monday, 2 April)
• Re: Section 13 (Monday, 2 April)

James M Snell

• Re: PATCH Draft (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: Required DIFF format [was Re: PATCH Draft] (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: PATCH Draft (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: PATCH and WebDAV, was Re: PATCH Draft (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: Required DIFF format [was Re: PATCH Draft] (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: PATCH and WebDAV, was Re: PATCH Draft (Tuesday, 26 June)
• Re: PATCH Draft (Tuesday, 26 June)
• Re: PATCH Draft (Tuesday, 26 June)
• PATCH Draft (Monday, 25 June)

Jamie Lokier

• Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Monday, 11 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Friday, 1 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Friday, 1 June)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: example for matching functions, was: Weak and strong ETags (Tuesday, 29 May)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: example for matching functions, was: Weak and strong ETags (Tuesday, 29 May)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: example for matching functions, was: Weak and strong ETags (Tuesday, 29 May)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: example for matching functions, was: Weak and strong ETags (Monday, 28 May)
• Re: HTTP 'HASH' Method (Sunday, 27 May)
• Re: HTTP 'HASH' Method (Sunday, 27 May)
• Re: pipelined client/server behaviour (Monday, 2 April)
• Re: pipelined client/server behaviour (Sunday, 1 April)
• Re: pipelined client/server behaviour (Sunday, 1 April)
• Re: pipelined client/server behaviour (Sunday, 1 April)

Jeffrey Mogul

• Re: PATCH Draft (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: If-match clarification (Thursday, 21 June)
• Re: HTTP version numbers returned by proxies (Monday, 18 June)
• Re: HTTP 'HASH' Method (Friday, 25 May)

Jim Gettys

• Re: [webkit-dev] Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal (Thursday, 7 June)

Joe Orton

• Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Friday, 8 June)

John C Klensin

• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Friday, 1 June)

Joris Dobbelsteen

• RE: protocol support for intercepting proxies (Monday, 18 June)

Julian Reschke

• Re: PATCH and WebDAV, was Re: PATCH Draft (Tuesday, 26 June)
• Re: PATCH Draft (Tuesday, 26 June)
• Re: Required DIFF format [was Re: PATCH Draft] (Tuesday, 26 June)
• Re: PATCH Draft (Tuesday, 26 June)
• Re: i51 HTTP-date vs. rfc1123-date, was: NEW ISSUE: date formats in BNF and spec text, was: RFC 2616 Errata: Misc. Typos (Wednesday, 20 June)
• Re: i51 HTTP-date vs. rfc1123-date, was: NEW ISSUE: date formats in BNF and spec text, was: RFC 2616 Errata: Misc. Typos (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: i51 HTTP-date vs. rfc1123-date, was: NEW ISSUE: date formats in BNF and spec text, was: RFC 2616 Errata: Misc. Typos (Tuesday, 19 June)
• i51 HTTP-date vs. rfc1123-date, was: NEW ISSUE: date formats in BNF and spec text, was: RFC 2616 Errata: Misc. Typos (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: migration to ABNF, was: i31 (qdtext BNF) resolved (Monday, 18 June)
• Re: migration to ABNF, was: i31 (qdtext BNF) resolved (Monday, 18 June)
• Re: migration to ABNF, was: i31 (qdtext BNF) resolved (Monday, 18 June)
• migration to ABNF, was: i31 (qdtext BNF) resolved (Monday, 18 June)
• i31 (qdtext BNF) resolved (Monday, 18 June)
• Re: FW: BCP0097 RFC 4897 on Handling Normative References to Standards-Track Documents (Monday, 18 June)
• Re: FW: BCP0097 RFC 4897 on Handling Normative References to Standards-Track Documents (Monday, 18 June)
• Re: my action item on issue 52 (Sort 1.3 Terminology) (Saturday, 16 June)
• Re: my action item on issue 52 (Sort 1.3 Terminology) (Friday, 15 June)
• Re: my action item on issue 52 (Sort 1.3 Terminology) (Friday, 15 June)
• my action item on issue 52 (Sort 1.3 Terminology) (Friday, 15 June)
• Re: RFC2617 erratum (editorial) (Wednesday, 13 June)
• Re: ISSUE 31: qdtext BNF (Tuesday, 12 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Monday, 11 June)
• Re: Timezone information in HTTP (Monday, 11 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Monday, 11 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Monday, 11 June)
• Re: Timezone information in HTTP (Friday, 8 June)
• RFC2617 erratum (editorial) (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: example for matching functions, was: Weak and strong ETags (Thursday, 7 June)
• RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: Issue i17 (Revise description of the POST method) (Monday, 4 June)
• Re: Issue i17 (Revise description of the POST method) (Monday, 4 June)
• Re: Issue i17 (Revise description of the POST method) (Monday, 4 June)
• Issue i17 (Revise description of the POST method) (Sunday, 3 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Friday, 1 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Friday, 1 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Friday, 1 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis -- call for errata/clarifications to 2617 (Thursday, 31 May)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Thursday, 31 May)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Thursday, 31 May)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Thursday, 31 May)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis -- call for errata/clarifications to 2617 (Thursday, 31 May)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Thursday, 31 May)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: ISO-8859-1 reference (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: example for matching functions, was: Weak and strong ETags (Tuesday, 29 May)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: example for matching functions, was: Weak and strong ETags (Tuesday, 29 May)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: example for matching functions, was: Weak and strong ETags (Monday, 28 May)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: classifying and updating informative references (Monday, 28 May)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: example for matching functions, was: Weak and strong ETags (Monday, 28 May)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: classifying and updating informative references (Monday, 28 May)
• NEW ISSUE: classifying and updating informative references (Monday, 28 May)
• NEW ISSUE: ISO-8859-1 reference (Monday, 28 May)
• Closing issues 45 (NNTP Reference), 46 (references to RFC1700), 47 (inconsistency in date format explanation), 48 (Date reference typo) (Monday, 28 May)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: example for matching functions, was: Weak and strong ETags (Monday, 28 May)
• Re: charset / Content-Type BNF flaw in RFC2616 (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: ISSUE 31: qdtext BNF (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: ISSUE 31: qdtext BNF (Monday, 21 May)
• Re: extending status codes (Thursday, 17 May)
• Re: i19 - bodies on GET -- round 2 (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: i19 - bodies on GET -- round 2 (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: Metalink: higher availability and integrity downloads (Monday, 7 May)
• Re: Metalink: higher availability and integrity downloads (Thursday, 26 April)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: updating from RFC2048 to RFC4288 (Wednesday, 25 April)
• NEW ISSUE: WS in quoted-pair, was: ISSUE 31: qdtext BNF (Friday, 20 April)
• ISSUE 31: qdtext BNF (Friday, 20 April)
• NEW ISSUE: redirection vs location (Thursday, 19 April)

Justin Erenkrantz

• Re: FYI: HTTP intermediary conformance (Saturday, 23 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Friday, 1 June)

Keith Moore

• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Sunday, 17 June)
• Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Thursday, 14 June)
• Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Thursday, 14 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Monday, 11 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Monday, 11 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Friday, 1 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Friday, 1 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Friday, 1 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Friday, 1 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Friday, 1 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Friday, 1 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Friday, 1 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Friday, 1 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Thursday, 31 May)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Thursday, 31 May)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Wednesday, 30 May)

Larry Masinter

• RE: PATCH and WebDAV, was Re: PATCH Draft (Thursday, 28 June)
• RE: PATCH Draft (Thursday, 28 June)
• RE: Required DIFF format [was Re: PATCH Draft] (Thursday, 28 June)
• RE: Required DIFF format [was Re: PATCH Draft] (Thursday, 28 June)
• RE: PATCH Draft (Tuesday, 26 June)
• RE: PATCH Draft (Monday, 25 June)
• RE: [RFC] HTTP Information Request (Friday, 22 June)
• RE: [RFC] HTTP Information Request (Thursday, 21 June)
• RE: [RFC] HTTP Information Request (Thursday, 21 June)
• FW: BCP0097 RFC 4897 on Handling Normative References to Standards-Track Documents (Monday, 18 June)
• RE: [webkit-dev] Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal (Friday, 8 June)
• RE: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Thursday, 31 May)
• RE: extending status codes (Thursday, 17 May)

Leif Johansson

• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis -- call for errata/clarifications to 2617 (Friday, 1 June)

Lisa Dusseault

• Re: PATCH Draft (Tuesday, 26 June)
• Required DIFF format [was Re: PATCH Draft] (Monday, 25 June)
• Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: migration to ABNF, was: i31 (qdtext BNF) resolved (Monday, 18 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Sunday, 10 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Thursday, 7 June)
• BOF request deadline Monday (Friday, 18 May)

lists@ingostruck.de

• Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Wednesday, 13 June)
• Re: RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Wednesday, 13 June)
• Re: RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Tuesday, 12 June)
• Re: RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Monday, 11 June)
• Re: RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Monday, 11 June)
• Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Friday, 8 June)
• Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Thursday, 7 June)

Maciej Stachowiak

• Re: [webkit-dev] Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: [webkit-dev] Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal (Thursday, 7 June)

Mark Andrews

• Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies (Tuesday, 19 June)
• SRV records and HTTP (Monday, 2 April)

Mark Karpelès

• Re: HTTP 'HASH' Method (Friday, 25 May)

Mark Nottingham

• Re: HTTPbis BOF at Chicago (Monday, 25 June)
• Re: FYI: HTTP intermediary conformance (Saturday, 23 June)
• FYI: HTTP intermediary conformance (Saturday, 23 June)
• Re: [RFC] HTTP Information Request (Friday, 22 June)
• Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Thursday, 14 June)
• Re: ISSUE 31: qdtext BNF (Tuesday, 12 June)
• Re: charset / Content-Type BNF flaw in RFC2616 (Tuesday, 12 June)
• Re: ISSUE: header length limit with encoded words (Tuesday, 12 June)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: ISO-8859-1 reference (Tuesday, 12 June)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: classifying and updating informative references (Tuesday, 12 June)
• Re: Closing issues 45 (NNTP Reference), 46 (references to RFC1700), 47 (inconsistency in date format explanation), 48 (Date reference typo) (Tuesday, 12 June)
• Re: ISSUE 31: qdtext BNF (Tuesday, 12 June)
• Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Tuesday, 12 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Friday, 1 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Friday, 1 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Friday, 1 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Friday, 1 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Thursday, 31 May)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Thursday, 31 May)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Thursday, 31 May)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis -- call for errata/clarifications to 2617 (Thursday, 31 May)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Straw-man charter for http-bis (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: i19 - bodies on GET -- round 2 (Wednesday, 16 May)
• i19 - bodies on GET -- round 2 (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Resourcing HTTP work [was: Planned for Chicago?] (Thursday, 26 April)
• Re: Prague meeting report (Thursday, 26 April)
• Prague meeting report (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: handling Proxy-Connection (Tuesday, 24 April)
• Re: ISSUE 31: qdtext BNF (Tuesday, 24 April)
• Re: WPAD Support for IPv6 (on-topic?) (Tuesday, 24 April)
• Re: pipelined client/server behaviour (Tuesday, 24 April)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: redirection vs location (Tuesday, 24 April)
• Re: New issue: 6.1.1 too vague about parsing requirements (Tuesday, 24 April)
• Re: Section 13 (Tuesday, 24 April)
• Re: New issue: 6.1.1 can on a quick reading be misread that it's a complete list of status codes (Tuesday, 24 April)
• Re: [NEW ISSUE] HTTP status code registry, was: Status 102 (Tuesday, 24 April)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: updating from RFC2048 to RFC4288 (Tuesday, 24 April)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: http URLvs Request-URI, was: 3.2.2 issue (Tuesday, 24 April)

Martin Duerst

• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Sunday, 10 June)

Mike Dierken

• Re: Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal (Thursday, 7 June)

Nicholas Shanks

• Re: [webkit-dev] Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal (Friday, 8 June)
• Re: [webkit-dev] Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal (Friday, 8 June)
• Re: [webkit-dev] Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: [webkit-dev] Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: [webkit-dev] Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: [webkit-dev] Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: [webkit-dev] Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: [webkit-dev] Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: [webkit-dev] Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal (Thursday, 7 June)
• Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal (Thursday, 7 June)

Paul Hoffman

• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Friday, 1 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Wednesday, 30 May)

Paul Leach

• RE: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Thursday, 7 June)
• RE: Straw-man charter for http-bis -- call for errata/clarifications to 2617 (Friday, 1 June)
• RE: Straw-man charter for http-bis -- call for errata/clarifications to 2617 (Thursday, 31 May)
• RE: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Thursday, 31 May)
• RE: Straw-man charter for http-bis -- call for errata/clarifications to 2617 (Thursday, 31 May)

Peter Speck

• Re: [webkit-dev] Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal (Friday, 8 June)
• Re: [webkit-dev] Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: [webkit-dev] Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: [webkit-dev] Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal (Thursday, 7 June)

Rob Burns

• Re: [webkit-dev] Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal (Thursday, 7 June)

Robert Brewer

• RE: [webkit-dev] Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal (Thursday, 7 June)

Robert Sayre

• Re: HTTPbis BOF at Chicago (Sunday, 24 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Monday, 18 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Friday, 1 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Friday, 1 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis -- call for errata/clarifications to 2617 (Thursday, 31 May)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis -- call for errata/clarifications to 2617 (Thursday, 31 May)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Thursday, 31 May)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis -- call for errata/clarifications to 2617 (Thursday, 31 May)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis -- call for errata/clarifications to 2617 (Thursday, 31 May)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: Planned for Chicago? (Friday, 25 May)
• Re: Escaping control characters in HTTP Digest (RFC 2617) (was: Escaping <\> in HTTP Digest (RFC 2617)) (Friday, 25 May)
• Re: Escaping control characters in HTTP Digest (RFC 2617) (was: Escaping <\> in HTTP Digest (RFC 2617)) (Thursday, 24 May)
• Re: Escaping control characters in HTTP Digest (RFC 2617) (was: Escaping <\> in HTTP Digest (RFC 2617)) (Thursday, 24 May)
• extending status codes (Thursday, 17 May)

Roy T. Fielding

• Re: HTTP version numbers returned by proxies (Thursday, 14 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Friday, 1 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Thursday, 31 May)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Thursday, 31 May)
• Re: pipelined client/server behaviour (Monday, 2 April)
• Re: pipelined client/server behaviour (Sunday, 1 April)

SiM

• Regarding dynamic ip addressed for HTTP Servers. (Friday, 29 June)

Stefan Eissing

• Re: PATCH Draft (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: PATCH Draft (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: PATCH Draft (Tuesday, 26 June)
• Re: PATCH Draft (Monday, 25 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Friday, 1 June)

Stefanos Harhalakis

• Re: [RFC] HTTP Information Request (Friday, 22 June)
• Re: [RFC] HTTP Information Request (Friday, 22 June)
• Re: [RFC] HTTP Information Request (Friday, 22 June)
• Re: [RFC] HTTP Information Request (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: [RFC] HTTP Information Request (Tuesday, 19 June)
• [RFC] HTTP Information Request (Saturday, 16 June)
• Client information (Wednesday, 13 June)
• Re: [RFC] HTTP Timezone - rev4 (Wednesday, 13 June)
• [RFC] HTTP Timezone - rev4 (Tuesday, 12 June)
• Re: Timezone information in HTTP (Monday, 11 June)
• Fwd: Re: [PHP] [RFC] HTTP timezone (Saturday, 9 June)
• I-D candidate: draft-sharhalakis-httptz-02.txt (Saturday, 9 June)
• Re: Timezone information in HTTP (Saturday, 9 June)
• Re: Timezone information in HTTP (Saturday, 9 June)
• Re: Timezone information in HTTP (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: Timezone information in HTTP (Thursday, 7 June)
• Timezone information in HTTP (Thursday, 7 June)

Stephane Bortzmeyer

• Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Thursday, 14 June)
• Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Tuesday, 12 June)
• Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Friday, 8 June)

Stewart Brodie

• Re: Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal (Thursday, 7 June)

tom.petch

• Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Monday, 18 June)
• Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Thursday, 14 June)
• Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Thursday, 14 June)

Travis Snoozy

• Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies (Monday, 18 June)
• Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies (Monday, 18 June)
• Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies (Sunday, 17 June)
• Re: my action item on issue 52 (Sort 1.3 Terminology) (Friday, 15 June)
• Re: HTTP version numbers returned by proxies (Thursday, 14 June)
• Re: HTTP version numbers returned by proxies (Thursday, 14 June)
• Re: Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal (Friday, 8 June)
• Re: Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: HTTP 'HASH' Method (Friday, 25 May)

V13

• Re: I-D candidate: draft-sharhalakis-httptz-02.txt (Sunday, 10 June)

Yaron Goland

• RE: PATCH Draft (Thursday, 28 June)
• RE: Required DIFF format [was Re: PATCH Draft] (Thursday, 28 June)

Yngve N. Pettersen (Developer Opera Software ASA)

• Re: pipelined client/server behaviour (Sunday, 1 April)

Yves Lafon

• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Friday, 8 June)
• Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis (Thursday, 31 May)
• i28 proposed replacement text (Wednesday, 25 April)

Last message date: Saturday, 30 June 2007 21:40:38 UTC