- From: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 16:51:55 +0200
- To: Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2007 14:52:03 UTC
tis 2007-06-19 klockan 21:58 +1200 skrev Adrien de Croy: > > Yeah, this all points to some sort of generic config protocol. Which is what DHCP, SRV and SLP all are in the discussed context, at different levels.. > DHCP is just so restricted it's hard to see why so much effort is still > being poured into it. Because it serves the purpose of distributing network local configuration details quite well. > There are now more options than you can > realistically fit into a 576 byte single UDP packet. And is why DHCP allows for larger messages (up to 64KB), if the client says it supports it.. > All to do config. > A separate config protocol or framework would be much easier to grow. SLP? Regards Henrik
Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2007 14:52:03 UTC