www-dom@w3.org from October to December 1999 by author

Andrew n marshall

• Methods Request (Wednesday, 17 November)

Arnaud Le Hors

• Re: help on DOM programming (Friday, 17 December)
• Re: NAMESPACE_ERR missing from createDoctype and createDocument (Thursday, 16 December)
• NAMESPACE_ERR missing from createDoctype and createDocument (Thursday, 16 December)
• xmlns & createElementNS (Thursday, 16 December)
• Re: Proposal for bootstrapable DOM and CSSOM (Friday, 19 November)
• Re: Proposal for bootstrapable DOM and CSSOM (Friday, 19 November)
• Re: Possible bug in specification of Element.setAttributeNS (Thursday, 14 October)
• Re: Combining two trees (Monday, 11 October)
• Live NodeLists (Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library!) (Thursday, 7 October)
• Extending the DOM (Thursday, 7 October)
• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! (Wednesday, 6 October)
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various (Tuesday, 5 October)
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various (Tuesday, 5 October)
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various (Tuesday, 5 October)
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various (Tuesday, 5 October)
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various (Monday, 4 October)
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various (Monday, 4 October)

Bill dehOra

• some confusion with the 'all' medium (Wednesday, 15 December)
• UML diagrams of the DOM (Friday, 19 November)
• DOM-Level-2-19991029 CSS OM (Wednesday, 17 November)

Box, Don

• Any reason that the Level 2 interfaces have the EXACT SAME NAME a s the Level 1 interfaces? (Sunday, 24 October)

Brad Clawsie

• Re: planned Level 3 modules (Thursday, 9 December)

Carl Thronson

• Interacting with a DOM XML parser. (Monday, 22 November)

Chris Harris

• question about DOM level 1 ordering of children (Tuesday, 9 November)

Christian Roth

• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! (Tuesday, 5 October)

Daniel Glazman

• Re: Proposal for bootstrapable DOM and CSSOM (Friday, 19 November)
• Proposal for bootstrapable DOM and CSSOM (Friday, 19 November)
• xml declaration (Wednesday, 13 October)

Daniel Noguerol

• Combining two trees (Friday, 8 October)

David Brownell

• Re: DOM Range comments (Wednesday, 29 December)
• Notes on DOM L2 CR (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Re: DOM Level 2 Last Call comments (Thursday, 9 December)
• Re: planned Level 3 modules (Thursday, 9 December)
• Re: Comments on DOM level 2 (Wednesday, 8 December)
• Re: Events ordering: Largely undefined? (Wednesday, 8 December)
• Re: DOM L2 RFE (Friday, 19 November)
• Re: DOM L2 RFE (Thursday, 18 November)
• DOM L2 RFE (Thursday, 18 November)
• Re: DOM-Level-2-19991029 CSS OM (Wednesday, 17 November)
• DOM RFEs (Tuesday, 16 November)
• Re: DOM DOM binding considered harmful,discriminates against opensource (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: DOM DOM binding considered harmful,discriminates against open source (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: DOM DOM binding considered harmful,discriminates against open source (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: DOM DOM binding considered harmful, discriminates against open source (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: splitText() (Wednesday, 3 November)
• Re: Any reason that the Level 2 interfaces have the EXACT SAME NAME a sthe Level 1 interfaces? (Wednesday, 27 October)
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various (Friday, 8 October)
• Re: DOM Level 2 needs getElementById method (Friday, 8 October)
• Re: DOM Level 2 needs getElementById method (Friday, 8 October)
• Re: DOM Level 2 needs getElementById method (Friday, 8 October)
• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! (Thursday, 7 October)
• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! (Thursday, 7 October)
• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! (Thursday, 7 October)
• Liveness (NodeList, Traversal) (Thursday, 7 October)
• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! (Thursday, 7 October)
• Re: DOM Level 2 needs getElementById method (Thursday, 7 October)
• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! (Wednesday, 6 October)
• Re: DOM Level 2 needs getElementById method (Wednesday, 6 October)
• Re: DOM Level 2 needs getElementById method (Tuesday, 5 October)
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various (Tuesday, 5 October)
• Re: Events ordering: Largely undefined? (Tuesday, 5 October)
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various (Monday, 4 October)
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various (Monday, 4 October)
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various (Monday, 4 October)
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various (Monday, 4 October)
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various (Monday, 4 October)
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various (Saturday, 2 October)
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various (Friday, 1 October)
• [Fwd: DOM Level 2 implementation/Java] (Friday, 1 October)

David Ziegler

• Possible bug in specification of Element.setAttributeNS (Tuesday, 12 October)

Eric Richardson

• Re: DOM binding considered harmful, discriminates against open source] (Tuesday, 14 December)
• Re: DOM binding considered harmful, discriminates against open source] (Monday, 13 December)

Garret Wilson

• Re: comments/questions/suggestions/bug reports for DOM Level 2 (Friday, 26 November)
• Re: comments/questions/suggestions/bug reports for DOM Level 2 (Thursday, 25 November)
• comments/questions/suggestions/bug reports for DOM Level 2 (Tuesday, 23 November)

Janet Daly

• Call for Implementations: Document Object Model (DOM) Level 2 Becomes W3C Candidate Recommendation (Friday, 10 December)

Jeff Fink

• Rearranging rows in a table (Wednesday, 13 October)

Jeff Lu

• How to get info out of DOM tree? (Friday, 26 November)

Jeff Mackay

• Re: DOM L2 comments, various (Monday, 4 October)
• RE: DOM L2 comments, various (Tuesday, 5 October)
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various (Monday, 4 October)
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various (Monday, 4 October)

Jian Chen

• help on DOM programming (Thursday, 16 December)

John Bradley

• Re: DOM Level 2 needs getElementById method (Thursday, 7 October)
• Re: DOM Level 2 needs getElementById method (Thursday, 7 October)

John Cowan

• Re: DOM binding considered harmful, discriminates against open source] (Tuesday, 14 December)
• Re: DOM binding considered harmful, discriminates against open source] (Monday, 13 December)
• Re: DOM DOM binding considered harmful, discriminates against open source (Monday, 29 November)
• Re: DOM DOM binding considered harmful,discriminates against open source (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: DOM DOM binding considered harmful, discriminates againstopen source (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: DOM DOM binding considered harmful, discriminates against open source (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: DOM DOM binding considered harmful, discriminates against open source (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: DOM DOM binding considered harmful, discriminates against open source (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: DOM DOM binding considered harmful, discriminates against open source (Tuesday, 9 November)
• DOM DOM binding considered harmful, discriminates against open source (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various (Tuesday, 5 October)
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various (Monday, 4 October)
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various (Monday, 4 October)

John G. Spragge

• Re: DOM L2 comments, various (Tuesday, 5 October)
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various (Tuesday, 5 October)

Junaid Hasan

• Re: Intent to make a Debian package with DOM Java bindings (Monday, 8 November)

Kasper Peeters

• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! (Thursday, 7 October)

KAZUMI Saito

• Re: What is returned by Document.getLocalName() ? (Monday, 1 November)
• What is returned by Document.getLocalName() ? (Monday, 1 November)

Ken MacLeod

• Re: DOM DOM binding considered harmful, discriminates against open source (Tuesday, 9 November)

keshlam@us.ibm.com

• Re: Again new comments on DOM Range (Wednesday, 29 December)
• Re: DOM Range comments (Wednesday, 29 December)
• Re: DOM binding considered harmful, discriminates against open source] (Monday, 13 December)
• Re: planned Level 3 modules (Thursday, 9 December)
• Re: namespace name for default attributes of prefix "xml:" (Monday, 6 December)
• Re: namespace name for default attributes of prefix "xml:" (Monday, 6 December)
• Re: DOM tree into a XML document ? (Saturday, 4 December)
• Re: How to get info out of DOM tree? (Monday, 29 November)
• Re: DOM L2 RFE (Friday, 19 November)
• Re: Methods Request (Friday, 19 November)
• Re: compatibility with the DOM Level 0 (Friday, 19 November)
• Re: DOM L2 RFE (Thursday, 18 November)
• Re: DOM-Level-2-19991029 CSS OM (Wednesday, 17 November)
• Re: DOM-Level-2-19991029 CSS OM (Wednesday, 17 November)
• Re: DOM DOM binding considered harmful, discriminates againstopen source (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: DOM DOM binding considered harmful,discriminates against open source (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: DOM DOM binding considered harmful, discriminates against open source (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: DOM DOM binding considered harmful, discriminates against open source (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: Intent to make a Debian package with DOM Java bindings (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: splitText() and well-formedness (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: TransformNode method (Wednesday, 3 November)
• Re: splitText() (Monday, 1 November)
• Re: DOM level 2 StyleSheets : What means "binding-specific casting methods" (Wednesday, 27 October)
• Re: xml declaration (Thursday, 14 October)
• Re: DOM Level 2 needs getElementById method (Friday, 8 October)
• Re: DOM Level 2 needs getElementById method (Friday, 8 October)
• Re: DOM Level 2 needs getElementById method (Friday, 8 October)
• Re: Comments on DOM level 2 (Friday, 8 October)
• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! (Thursday, 7 October)
• DOM LC suggestions (was Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library!) (Thursday, 7 October)
• Re: DOM Level 2 needs getElementById method (Thursday, 7 October)
• Re: DOM Level 2 needs getElementById method (Thursday, 7 October)
• Re: DOM Level 2 needs getElementById method (Thursday, 7 October)
• Re: DOM Level 2 needs getElementById method (Thursday, 7 October)
• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! (Wednesday, 6 October)
• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! (Wednesday, 6 October)
• Re: Events ordering: Largely undefined? (Tuesday, 5 October)
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various (Tuesday, 5 October)
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various (Tuesday, 5 October)
• Events ordering: Largely undefined? (Tuesday, 5 October)
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various (Monday, 4 October)
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various (Monday, 4 October)
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various (Monday, 4 October)
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various (Monday, 4 October)
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various (Monday, 4 October)
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various (Friday, 1 October)

Kollár Lajos

• Question about DOM2 Range (Monday, 20 December)

L. David Baron

• splitText() (Saturday, 30 October)
• Re: looking for interesting DOM applications (Friday, 29 October)
• Re: Rearranging rows in a table (Thursday, 14 October)

Lauren Wood

• Re: Question about DOM2 Range (Monday, 20 December)
• Re: NAMESPACE_ERR missing from createDoctype and createDocument (Thursday, 16 December)
• Re: xmlns & createElementNS (Thursday, 16 December)
• Re: planned Level 3 modules (Friday, 10 December)
• planned Level 3 modules (Thursday, 9 December)
• DOM Level 2 Last Call comments (Thursday, 9 December)
• Re: DOM DOM binding considered harmful, discriminates against open source (Monday, 29 November)
• Re: DOM DOM binding considered harmful, discriminates against open source (Friday, 26 November)
• Re: DOM Level 2 needs getElementById method (Thursday, 25 November)
• Re: splitText() (Thursday, 25 November)
• Re: Comments on DOM level 2 (Thursday, 25 November)
• Re: Events ordering: Largely undefined? (Thursday, 25 November)
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various (Thursday, 25 November)
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various (Thursday, 25 November)
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various (Thursday, 25 November)
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various (Thursday, 25 November)
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various (Thursday, 25 November)
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various (Thursday, 25 November)
• Re: Node.replaceChild with newChild being a DocumentFragment (Thursday, 25 November)
• Re: DOM L2 RFE (Wednesday, 24 November)
• Re: DOM RFEs (Tuesday, 16 November)
• Re: question about DOM level 1 ordering of children (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: DOM DOM binding considered harmful, discriminates against open source (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: looking for interesting DOM applications (Friday, 29 October)
• looking for interesting DOM applications (Friday, 29 October)
• Re: DOM Level 2 needs getElementById method (Friday, 8 October)
• Re: DOM Level 2 needs getElementById method (Friday, 8 October)
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various (Friday, 1 October)

Lee Hyoung Moon

• DOM level 2 StyleSheets : What means "binding-specific casting methods" (Wednesday, 27 October)

Mary Brady

• DOM ECMAScript Tests (Friday, 3 December)

Michael Champion

• Re: compatibility with the DOM Level 0 (Friday, 19 November)
• Re: TransformNode method (Tuesday, 2 November)
• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! (Thursday, 7 October)
• Re: Liveness (NodeList, Traversal) (Thursday, 7 October)
• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! (Thursday, 7 October)
• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! (Thursday, 7 October)
• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! (Thursday, 7 October)
• Re: DOM Level 2 needs getElementById method (Thursday, 7 October)
• Making the DOM a more useful libaray API (was Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library!) (Wednesday, 6 October)
• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! (Tuesday, 5 October)
• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! (Tuesday, 5 October)
• Re: DOM Level 2 needs getElementById method (Tuesday, 5 October)
• DOM Level 2 needs getElementById method (Tuesday, 5 October)
• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! (Tuesday, 5 October)

MICHAEL.SARTORI@DLH.DE

• DOM tree into a XML document ? (Friday, 3 December)

Paul

• Re: DOM Level 2 needs getElementById method (Friday, 8 October)

Paul Prescod

• Re: DOM Level 2 needs getElementById method (Friday, 8 October)

Philip Siniscalchi

• Remove (Friday, 29 October)

Philippe Le Hegaret

• Re: DOM DOM binding and free software (Sunday, 19 December)
• Re: DOM binding considered harmful, discriminates against open source] (Tuesday, 14 December)
• Re: comments/questions/suggestions/bug reports for DOM Level 2 (Friday, 26 November)
• Re: New DOM Level 2 Working Draft (Thursday, 25 November)
• Re: comments/questions/suggestions/bug reports for DOM Level 2 (Thursday, 25 November)
• Re: Methods Request (Friday, 19 November)
• Re: DOM-Level-2-19991029 CSS OM (Wednesday, 17 November)
• CSS: resolved and unresolved issues. (Tuesday, 16 November)
• Re: Intent to make a Debian package with DOM Java bindings (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: DOM level 2 StyleSheets : What means "binding-specific casting methods" (Wednesday, 27 October)
• Re: DOM Level 2 needs getElementById method (Thursday, 7 October)
• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! (Wednesday, 6 October)

Ramin Danaei-Boroumand

• compatibility with the DOM Level 0 (Friday, 19 November)

Raph Levien

• Concrete proposal for MVC-capable DOM event flow (Wednesday, 15 December)

Ray D. Whitmer

• Re: planned Level 3 modules (Thursday, 9 December)
• Re: DOM L2 RFE (Friday, 19 November)
• Re: Any reason that the Level 2 interfaces have the EXACT SAME NAME a s the Level 1 interfaces? (Monday, 25 October)
• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! (Monday, 11 October)
• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! (Friday, 8 October)

Richard Stallman

• DOM DOM binding and free software (Sunday, 19 December)

Rick Jelliffe

• Comments on DOM level 2 (Friday, 8 October)

Russ Heithoff

• How do I get off this list? (Monday, 22 November)

Sean Mc Grath

• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! (Thursday, 7 October)

SeongCheol Kim

• Sorry! I was out of scope www-dom mailing list questions. (Friday, 8 October)
• Hi! Can Linux g++(C++ compiler) make reentrant binary? (like a Win-NT DLL) (Thursday, 7 October)

stefano debenedetti

• Re: Proposal for bootstrapable DOM and CSSOM (Friday, 19 November)

Stephan Selle

• TransformNode method (Tuesday, 2 November)

Stephane Bortzmeyer

• Re: Intent to make a Debian package with DOM Java bindings (Monday, 8 November)
• Intent to make a Debian package with DOM Java bindings (Friday, 5 November)

Stephen R. Savitzky

• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! (Monday, 11 October)
• Re: Live NodeLists (Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library!) (Thursday, 7 October)
• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! (Thursday, 7 October)
• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! (Thursday, 7 October)
• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! (Wednesday, 6 October)
• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! (Wednesday, 6 October)
• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! (Wednesday, 6 October)
• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! (Wednesday, 6 October)
• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! (Wednesday, 6 October)
• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! (Tuesday, 5 October)
• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! (Tuesday, 5 October)
• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! (Tuesday, 5 October)
• The DOM is not a model, it is a library! (Tuesday, 5 October)
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various (Tuesday, 5 October)
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various (Tuesday, 5 October)
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various (Monday, 4 October)
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various (Monday, 4 October)
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various (Monday, 4 October)
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various (Monday, 4 October)
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various (Monday, 4 October)
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various (Monday, 4 October)

Steve Ball

• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! (Friday, 8 October)
• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! (Thursday, 7 October)

Takuki Kamiya

• namespace name for default attributes of prefix "xml:" (Monday, 6 December)
• Node.replaceChild with newChild being a DocumentFragment (Thursday, 25 November)
• Re: DOM Level 2 needs getElementById method (Thursday, 7 October)

Tangi Vass

• DOM serialization (Monday, 11 October)

Thierry Kormann

• Another DOM Range comment (Tuesday, 28 December)
• Again new comments on DOM Range (Tuesday, 28 December)
• Still some DOM Range comments (Tuesday, 28 December)
• DOM Range comments (Tuesday, 28 December)

Tim Taylor

• Re: DOM L2 comments, various (Thursday, 7 October)

Uche Ogbuji

• ANN: 4DOM 0.9.0 (Monday, 20 December)

uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com

• Re: Xpath and DOM (Sunday, 26 December)
• New 4Suite mailing list (Friday, 26 November)
• ANN: 4DOM 0.8.2 (Thursday, 21 October)

uche@ieee.org

• Re: [Fwd: DOM Level 2 implementation/Java] (Friday, 1 October)

Vidur Apparao

• Re: New DOM Level 2 Working Draft (Wednesday, 10 November)

wq

• Tow questions about dom event model (Wednesday, 24 November)

Last message date: Tuesday, 28 December 1999 21:52:38 UTC