keshlam@us.ibm.com wrote: > > >Sigh. One of the "last call" comments from me is to get DTD > >support into L2 -- and not hold things up any longer for schemas. > > We don't have any design yet for the DTD support. Hmm, I sure thought some DTD proposals had been made; enough folk have talked about "old DTD proposals". I could make one on fairly short notice, if need be. > We could hold up L2 for as > long as it takes to bang out that design, or we can let L2 continue and then > release L3 as quickly as we can manage it. I think the latter will give you > schema support at about the same date, and let folks start using the L2 features > in the meantime. I don't see a rush for getting L2 out; I'd rather see it out with the features it needs. And I'd far rather see a decent job be done on DTDs in the next month or two, and cause a slight delay in L2 DOM (and time pressure to keep it slight!), than to see most of a year pass before L3 happens. L3 is sure to have all kinds of other stuff going on. - DaveReceived on Friday, 8 October 1999 13:06:59 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:24:51 GMT