> Again, runtime type ID (as opposed to runtime type *tests*) is not > enough. I know; I've experimented with the same kind of implementation. But either lack of RTTI _or_ classes that implement multiple interfaces would be sufficient to establish the need for nodeType, and I didn't want to bring up the latter because some folks argue "but you shouldn't have done it that way". ______________________________________ Joe Kesselman / IBM ResearchReceived on Monday, 4 October 1999 17:04:04 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:24:51 GMT